These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31811841)

  • 1. Access to IUD removal: Data from a mystery-caller study.
    Amico JR; Heintz C; Bennett AH; Gold M
    Contraception; 2020 Feb; 101(2):122-129. PubMed ID: 31811841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Access to the copper IUD as post-coital contraception: results from a mystery caller study.
    Schubert FD; Bishop ES; Gold M
    Contraception; 2016 Nov; 94(5):561-566. PubMed ID: 27374737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Access to single-visit IUD insertion at obstetrician-gynecology practices in Ohio: An audit study.
    Serpico JJ; Ricks JM; Smooth WG; Romanos C; Brook DL; Gallo MF
    Contraception; 2020 Sep; 102(3):190-194. PubMed ID: 32450080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What Are Women Told When Requesting Family Planning Services at Clinics Associated with Catholic Hospitals? A Mystery Caller Study.
    Guiahi M; Teal SB; Swartz M; Huynh S; Schiller G; Sheeder J
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2017 Dec; 49(4):207-212. PubMed ID: 29024351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of a revised appointment scheduling script on IUD service delivery in three Title X family planning clinics.
    Gilliam ML; Mistretta SQ; Martins SL; Holl JL
    Contraception; 2014 Nov; 90(5):548-9. PubMed ID: 25033748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rural Ambulatory Access for Semi-Urgent Care and the Relationship of Distance to an Emergency Department.
    Parks A; Hoegh A; Kuehl D
    West J Emerg Med; 2015 Jul; 16(4):594-9. PubMed ID: 26265979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A mystery shopper study identifying practice-level barriers to adolescent IUD access in western Pennsylvania.
    Lim SE; Krajewski CM
    Contraception; 2020 Feb; 101(2):130-131. PubMed ID: 31786202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "$231 … to pull a string!!!" American IUD users' reasons for IUD self-removal: An analysis of internet forums.
    Amico JR; Stimmel S; Hudson S; Gold M
    Contraception; 2020 Jun; 101(6):393-398. PubMed ID: 32088175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. IUD services among primary care practices in New York City.
    Jacobson L; Garbers S; Helmy H; Roobol H; Kohn JE; Kavanaugh ML
    Contraception; 2016 Mar; 93(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 26569447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A systematic approach to improving intrauterine device services in family planning clinics.
    Gilliam ML; Mistretta SQ; Martins SL; Holl JL
    Contraception; 2014 Nov; 90(5):542-7. PubMed ID: 25088606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medicaid coverage and access to obstetrics and gynecology subspecialists: findings from a national mystery caller study in the United States.
    Corbisiero MF; Tolbert B; Sanches M; Shelden N; Hachicha Y; Dao H; Thillot B; Adkins K; Muffly TM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jun; 228(6):722.e1-722.e9. PubMed ID: 36907536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safe and cost-effective ultrasound guided removal of retained intrauterine device: our experience.
    Verma U; Astudillo-Dávalos FE; Gerkowicz SA
    Contraception; 2015 Jul; 92(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 25708503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative study of the ease of removal of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Roke CM
    Contraception; 1988 Jun; 37(6):555-63. PubMed ID: 3396356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Expanding Access to the Intrauterine Device in Public Health Facilities in Ethiopia: A Mixed-Methods Study.
    Tilahun Y; Mehta S; Zerihun H; Lew C; Brooks MI; Nigatu T; Hagos KL; Asnake M; Tasissa A; Ali S; Desalegn K; Adane G
    Glob Health Sci Pract; 2016 Mar; 4(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 27016541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Organizational barriers to the availability and insertion of intrauterine devices in Primary Health Care Services.
    Gonzaga VAS; Borges ALV; Santos OAD; Rosa PLFS; Gonçalves RFS
    Rev Esc Enferm USP; 2017 Dec; 51():e03270. PubMed ID: 29267735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Private general paediatric care availability in Melbourne.
    Kunin M; Allen AR; Nicolas C; Freed GL
    Aust Health Rev; 2017 Mar; 41(1):63-67. PubMed ID: 27007723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differences in Family Planning Services by Rural-urban Geography: Survey of Title X-Supported Clinics In Great Plains and Midwestern States.
    Martins SL; Starr KA; Hellerstedt WL; Gilliam ML
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2016 Mar; 48(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 26841331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of Knowledge of Self-removability of Intrauterine Contraceptives on Uptake, Continuation, and Satisfaction.
    Raifman S; Barar R; Foster D
    Womens Health Issues; 2018; 28(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 28882549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of a novel metric of timely care access to primary care services.
    Batten AJ; Augustine MR; Nelson KM; Kaboli PJ
    Health Serv Res; 2020 Apr; 55(2):301-309. PubMed ID: 31943208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Access points for the underserved: primary care appointment availability at federally qualified health centers in 10 States.
    Richards MR; Saloner B; Kenney GM; Rhodes K; Polsky D
    Med Care; 2014 Sep; 52(9):818-25. PubMed ID: 25072878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.