These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Public transparency Web sites for radiology practices: prevalence of price, clinical quality, and service quality information. Rosenkrantz AB; Doshi AM Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(3):531-4. PubMed ID: 27133699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The ACR Managed Care Committee: focusing private payers on radiology issues. Ullrich CG; Keysor KJ J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Feb; 4(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 17412242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quality assurance in mammography. Accreditation, legislation, and compliance with quality assurance standards. Hendrick RE Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):243-55. PubMed ID: 1732931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The Mammography Quality Standards Act. An overview of the regulations and guidance. Monsees BS Radiol Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 38(4):759-72. PubMed ID: 10943276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Standardization of image quality and radiation dose in mammography. Hendrick RE Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):648-54. PubMed ID: 2305044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The American College of Radiology Mammography Accreditation Program. Meyer P; Zinninger M; Wilcox P Adm Radiol; 1990 Aug; 9(8):27-8, 30, 33-6. PubMed ID: 10106046 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The ACR Practice Accreditation Program for radiation oncology. Steinfeld A; Diamond J; Franco J; Hanks G Adm Radiol; 1990 Apr; 9(4):27, 29-30, 32. PubMed ID: 10104679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. ACR program accredits nearly 800 mammography units. Kumar S J Natl Cancer Inst; 1989 Aug; 81(16):1211-2. PubMed ID: 2754741 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Interrelating sentinel event alert #38 with the ACR guidance document on MR safe practices: 2013. An MRI accreditation safety review tool. Gilk T; Kanal E J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Mar; 37(3):531-43. PubMed ID: 23345250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A survey on performance status of mammography machines: image quality and dosimetry studies using a standard mammography imaging phantom. Sharma R; Sharma SD; Mayya YS Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jul; 150(3):325-33. PubMed ID: 22090414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quality Measurements in Radiology: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Survey of Radiology Benefit Management Groups. Narayan A; Cinelli C; Carrino JA; Nagy P; Coresh J; Riese VG; Durand DJ J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Nov; 12(11):1173-81.e23. PubMed ID: 26372621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Are current mammography quality standards act (MQSA) physician guidelines truly adequate? Melton AR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Aug; 191(2):W79. PubMed ID: 18647894 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The future quality and safety of medical imaging: proceedings of the third annual ACR FORUM. Hillman BJ; Amis ES; Neiman HL; J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jan; 1(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 17411517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Reasons for failure of a mammography unit at clinical image review in the American College of Radiology Mammography Accreditation Program. Bassett LW; Farria DM; Bansal S; Farquhar MA; Wilcox PA; Feig SA Radiology; 2000 Jun; 215(3):698-702. PubMed ID: 10831687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]