34 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31812841)
1. The characteristics of the residual disease after cervical conization: A retrospective analysis from a tertiary gynecological cancer center.
Giray B; Kabaca C; Uzun MG
Indian J Cancer; 2023; 60(3):390-395. PubMed ID: 36861714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk Factors for Persistence or Recurrence of High-Grade Cervical Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions.
Bittencourt DD; Zanine RM; Sebastião APM; Ribas CM
Rev Col Bras Cir; 2023; 50():e20233537. PubMed ID: 38055549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Margin status after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and laser excision in patients with high-grade cervical neoplasia.
Mosseri J; Benoit L; Koual M; Nguyen-Xuan HT; Bentivegna E; Bats AS; Azaïs H
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2024 Jan; 53(1):102707. PubMed ID: 38061495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extensive lesions and a positive cone margin are strong predictors of residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following conization for squamous intraepithelial lesion grade 2 or 3 study design.
Peng H; Liu W; Jiang J; Du H
BMC Womens Health; 2023 Aug; 23(1):454. PubMed ID: 37641051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rate of Involved Endocervical Margins According to High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Subtype and Transformation Zone Type in Specimens with Cone Length ≤ 10 mm versus > 10 mm-A Retrospective Analysis.
Paternostro C; Joura EA; Ranftl C; Langthaler EM; Ristl R; Dorittke T; Pils S
Life (Basel); 2023 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 37629632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are "additional cuts" effective for positive margins in cervical conization? It varies according to the doctor.
Sun Y; He Y; Zhuoma M; Hua Z; Sun Z; Jiang N; Kong F; Xiao Z
World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Aug; 21(1):260. PubMed ID: 37612769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Establishment of a prognostic model for preterm delivery in women after cervical conization].
Lou Y; Zhou Y; Lu H; Lyu W
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Feb; 47(4):351-356. PubMed ID: 30511520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [SURGICAL TREATMENT OF CERVICAL EROSION (ELECTRO-CONIZATION)].
SAHEKI M
Sanfujinka Chiryo; 1964 Aug; 9():152-60. PubMed ID: 14199555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Unexpected Cancers at Final Histology: A Study on Endometrial Sampling Methods and Risk Factors.
Giannella L; Delli Carpini G; Sopracordevole F; Papiccio M; Serri M; Giorda G; Tsiroglou D; Del Fabro A; Ciavattini A
Diagnostics (Basel); 2020 Jul; 10(7):. PubMed ID: 32668563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. HPV Vaccination: The Position Paper of the Italian Society of Colposcopy and Cervico-Vaginal Pathology (SICPCV).
Ciavattini A; Giannella L; De Vincenzo R; Di Giuseppe J; Papiccio M; Lukic A; Delli Carpini G; Perino A; Frega A; Sopracordevole F; Barbero M; Gultekin M
Vaccines (Basel); 2020 Jul; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 32630772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines in the Postvaccination Era: Review of the Literature.
Liverani CA; Di Giuseppe J; Giannella L; Delli Carpini G; Ciavattini A
J Oncol; 2020; 2020():8887672. PubMed ID: 33204265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An Abnormal Precone Endocervical Curettage Result Is an Independent Risk Factor for Positive Margins in Conization Specimens.
An J; Lei H; Xie X; Sun P
Oncol Res Treat; 2020; 43(10):518-525. PubMed ID: 32772026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of the risk of recurrent disease-a 16-year follow-up study.
Alder S; Megyessi D; Sundström K; Östensson E; Mints M; Belkić K; Arbyn M; Andersson S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 222(2):172.e1-172.e12. PubMed ID: 31473226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictive factors from cold knife conization for residual cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy.
Moore BC; Higgins RV; Laurent SL; Marroum MC; Bellitt P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug; 173(2):361-6; discussion 366-8. PubMed ID: 7645609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Endocervical crypt involvement by high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and its association with high-grade histopathological recurrence after cervical excision in women with negative excision margins: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Papoutsis D; Underwood M; Parry-Smith W; Tzavara C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 Mar; 309(3):939-948. PubMed ID: 37821642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability of negative cone specimens of the cervix: A review.
Lorenset LC; Zanine RM
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2022 Jun; 58():151929. PubMed ID: 35245822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What is the value of pre-surgical variables in addition to cone dimensions in predicting cone margin status?
Giannella L; Di Giuseppe J; Prandi S; Delli Carpini G; Tsiroglou D; Ciavattini A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jan; 244():180-184. PubMed ID: 31812841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
