These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3181295)

  • 21. Treatment of Class II, division 1, cases with a maxillary traction splint.
    Seçkin O; Surucu R
    Quintessence Int; 1990 Mar; 21(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 2374804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Effects of activators in class II division 1 therapy].
    Ulgen M; Schmuth GP
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1987 Feb; 48(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 3471695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of the effects of fixed and removable functional appliances on the skeletal and dentoalveolar structures.
    Bilgiç F; Hamamci O; Başaran G
    Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 22372266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Skeletal and soft tissue response to activator treatment.
    Forsberg CM; Odenrick L
    Eur J Orthod; 1981; 3(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 6945995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Changes in the soft tissue after functional orthodontic treatment determined by cephalometry--statistical study of Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion].
    Stefani E
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1984 Feb; 45(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 6590439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The relationship between hard and soft tissue changes following treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions using Edgewise and Fränkel appliance techniques.
    Battagel JM
    Eur J Orthod; 1990 May; 12(2):154-65. PubMed ID: 2351200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Cephalometric and tomographic evaluation of the treatment results of Class II division 1 obtained by elastic activator].
    Demirović D; Filipović M
    Bilt Udruz Ortodonata Jugosl; 1989; 22(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 2638168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A cephalometric comparison of bony profile changes in Class II, division 1 patients treated with extraoral force and functional jaw orthopedics.
    Meach CL
    Am J Orthod; 1966 May; 52(5):353-70. PubMed ID: 4951436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical application of the Fränkel appliance. Case reports.
    Owen AH
    Angle Orthod; 1983 Jan; 53(1):29-88. PubMed ID: 6573864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Class II, division 1 treatment with Fränkel and Edgewise appliances--a comparative study of mandibular growth and facial esthetics.
    Adenwalla ST; Kronman JH
    Angle Orthod; 1985 Oct; 55(4):281-98. PubMed ID: 3865566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Interception of a Class 2 division 1 malocclusion using mandibular hyperpropulsion. Cephalometric results].
    Rochon G
    Inf Dent; 1986 Dec; 68(43):4397-401. PubMed ID: 3470257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
    Tomblyn T; Rogers M; Andrews L; Martin C; Tremont T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Skeletal changes during the treatment of Class II/I malocclusions.
    Cohen AM
    Br J Orthod; 1983 Jul; 10(3):147-53. PubMed ID: 6575823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Treatment of a basal and dental Class II malocclusion in mixed dentition, with functional appliances and extraoral traction].
    Viora E; Mossino ML; Ramirez Velarde JC; Guglielmino D
    Minerva Ortognatod; 1989; 7(3-4):117-32. PubMed ID: 2640572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Treatment of Class II malocclusions with removable appliances. 1. Case assessment.
    Rock WP
    Br Dent J; 1990 Feb; 168(4):163-6. PubMed ID: 2310637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Mechanism of action of functional appliances in corrective orthodontics].
    Turkewicz JM; Wechsler MH
    J Dent Que; 1986 Jan; 23():9-13. PubMed ID: 3459753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial.
    O'Brien K; Wright J; Conboy F; Sanjie Y; Mandall N; Chadwick S; Connolly I; Cook P; Birnie D; Hammond M; Harradine N; Lewis D; McDade C; Mitchell L; Murray A; O'Neill J; Read M; Robinson S; Roberts-Harry D; Sandler J; Shaw I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Aug; 124(2):128-37. PubMed ID: 12923506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluating the effect of Sabbagh Universal Spring during treatment of growing class II malocclusions.
    Hanandeh BA; El-Bialy AA
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010; 21(4):13-24. PubMed ID: 21314084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mandibular growth, condyle position and Fränkel appliance therapy.
    Gianelly AA; Brosnan P; Martignoni M; Bernstein L
    Angle Orthod; 1983 Apr; 53(2):131-42. PubMed ID: 6576652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Vertical dentofacial changes during Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation.
    Pancherz H
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1982; 15():189-96. PubMed ID: 6963773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.