These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3181298)

  • 1. An evaluation of the morphogenic and anatomic effects of the functional regulator utilizing the counterpart analysis.
    Enlow DH; DiGangi D; McNamara JA; Mina M
    Eur J Orthod; 1988 Aug; 10(3):192-202. PubMed ID: 3181298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of activator treatment on class II malocclusions.
    Wieslander L; Lagerström L
    Am J Orthod; 1979 Jan; 75(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 283692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Five-year treatment results with a headgear-activator combination.
    Lehman R; Romuli A; Bakker V
    Eur J Orthod; 1988 Nov; 10(4):309-18. PubMed ID: 3061833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on class II patients.
    McNamara JA; Bookstein FL; Shaughnessy TG
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Aug; 88(2):91-110. PubMed ID: 3861103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Special discrepancies between the endocranial and exocranial regions in Class II, division 1. (Re-equilibration treatment using functional orthodontic therapy)].
    Pietrobattista A; Cordaro L; De Cecco G; Tiberi L
    Mondo Ortod; 1988; 13(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 3256785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treatment effects of the Herbst appliance.
    Valant JR; Sinclair PM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Feb; 95(2):138-47. PubMed ID: 2916470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of activator treatment on Class II, division 1 malocclusion.
    Chang HF; Wu KM; Chen KC; Cheng MC
    J Clin Orthod; 1989 Aug; 23(8):560-3. PubMed ID: 2639151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Skeletal changes during the treatment of Class II/I malocclusions.
    Cohen AM
    Br J Orthod; 1983 Jul; 10(3):147-53. PubMed ID: 6575823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A cephalometric comparison of bony profile changes in Class II, division 1 patients treated with extraoral force and functional jaw orthopedics.
    Meach CL
    Am J Orthod; 1966 May; 52(5):353-70. PubMed ID: 4951436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Removable appliances for Class II].
    Chateau M; Le Gall Y
    Rev Orthop Dento Faciale; 1975 Apr; 9(2):129-42. PubMed ID: 1078103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in facial dimensions associated with the use of forces to retract the maxilla.
    Baumrind S; Korn EL; Molthen R; West EE
    Am J Orthod; 1981 Jul; 80(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 6942655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patterns of change in mandibular and facial shape associated with the use of forces to retract the maxilla.
    Baumrind S; Korn EL
    Am J Orthod; 1981 Jul; 80(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 6942656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The architecture of the facial skeleton in distocclusion and its changes after treatment with the functional regulator].
    Choroschilkina FJ; Malygin JM
    Stomatol DDR; 1983 Mar; 33(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 6577743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A study of class II division 1 malocclusions treated by the Andresen appliance.
    Cohen AM
    Br J Orthod; 1981 Jul; 8(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 6942893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maxillary control with functional appliances: some clinical observations.
    Heath JR
    Aust Orthod J; 1985 Oct; 9(2):219-25. PubMed ID: 3870082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Interception of a Class 2 division 1 malocclusion using mandibular hyperpropulsion. Cephalometric results].
    Rochon G
    Inf Dent; 1986 Dec; 68(43):4397-401. PubMed ID: 3470257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cephalometric changes in Class II, Division 1 cases after orthopedic treatment with the bioactivator.
    Dahan J; Serhal JB; Englebert A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Feb; 95(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 2916469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Arch width development in Class II patients treated with the Fränkel appliance.
    McDougall PD; McNamara JA; Dierkes JM
    Am J Orthod; 1982 Jul; 82(1):10-22. PubMed ID: 6760718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of skeletal and dental changes produced by function regulators (FR-2 and FR-3).
    Kerr WJ; TenHave TR; McNamara JA
    Eur J Orthod; 1989 Aug; 11(3):235-42. PubMed ID: 2792213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The Fränkel functional regulator II in the treatment of a Class II, division 1 malocclusion with a retruded mandible].
    Ferro A; Spena R; Aronna P
    Mondo Ortod; 1986; 11(2):23-34. PubMed ID: 3461274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.