160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31813025)
1. Energy output modalities of shockwave lithotripsy in the treatment of urinary stones: escalating or fixed voltage? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
He Z; Deng T; Yin S; Xu Z; Duan H; Chen Y; Duan X; Zeng G
World J Urol; 2020 Oct; 38(10):2443-2453. PubMed ID: 31813025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Supine versus Prone Position during Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Treating Distal Ureteral Calculi: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Li T; Gao L; Chen P; Bu S; Cao D; Yang L; Wei Q
Urol Int; 2016; 97(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 26352560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does Stepwise Voltage Ramping Protect the Kidney from Injury During Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy? Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial.
Skuginna V; Nguyen DP; Seiler R; Kiss B; Thalmann GN; Roth B
Eur Urol; 2016 Feb; 69(2):267-73. PubMed ID: 26119561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Prospective Evaluation of High-Resolution CT Parameters in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Success for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi.
Abdelhamid M; Mosharafa AA; Ibrahim H; Selim HM; Hamed M; Elghoneimy MN; Salem HK; Abdelazim MS; Badawy H
J Endourol; 2016 Nov; 30(11):1227-1232. PubMed ID: 27597174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of conventional and step-wise shockwave lithotripsy in management of urinary calculi.
Demirci D; Sofikerim M; Yalçin E; Ekmekçioğlu O; Gülmez I; Karacagil M
J Endourol; 2007 Dec; 21(12):1407-10. PubMed ID: 18044996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of output voltage distribution on stone comminution efficiency during shockwave lithotripsy in renal or ureteropelvic junction stones: a preliminary study.
You D; Park J; Hong B; Park HK
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2010 Sep; 44(4):236-41. PubMed ID: 20446817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of High, Intermediate, and Low Frequency Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Urinary Tract Stone Disease: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Kang DH; Cho KS; Ham WS; Lee H; Kwon JK; Choi YD; Lee JY
PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158661. PubMed ID: 27387279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Stepwise Voltage Escalation on Treatment Outcomes following Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy of Renal Calculi: A Prospective Randomized Study.
Ng CF; Yee CH; Teoh JYC; Lau B; Leung SCH; Wong CYP; Wong KT; Chu WCW; Yuen J
J Urol; 2019 Nov; 202(5):986-993. PubMed ID: 31112104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modified shockwave propulsion lithotripsy improves the lower pole renal stone clearance.
Grabsky A; Arzumanyan K; Shadyan G; Aloyan A; Ayvazyan L; Ballesta Martinez B; Tsaturyan A
Urolithiasis; 2022 Dec; 50(6):751-757. PubMed ID: 36156104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experience with EDAP LT02 extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in 1363 patients: comparison with results of LT01 SWL in 1586 patients.
Kim SC; Moon YT
J Endourol; 1997 Apr; 11(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 9107582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of shockwave lithotripsy and microperc for treatment of kidney stones in children.
Hatipoglu NK; Sancaktutar AA; Tepeler A; Bodakci MN; Penbegul N; Atar M; Bozkurt Y; Söylemez H; Silay MS; Istanbulluoğlu MO; Akman T; Armagan A
J Endourol; 2013 Sep; 27(9):1141-6. PubMed ID: 23713511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Which is the best treatment of pediatric upper urinary tract stones among extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review.
He Q; Xiao K; Chen Y; Liao B; Li H; Wang K
BMC Urol; 2019 Oct; 19(1):98. PubMed ID: 31640693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The efficacy and safety of diuretics on extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy treatment of urolithiasis: A systematic review and meta analysis.
Dong L; Wang F; Chen H; Lu Y; Zhang Y; Chen L; Cui Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jun; 99(25):e20602. PubMed ID: 32569188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of diuretic administration on outcomes of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang Z; Bai Y; Wang J
PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0230059. PubMed ID: 32134993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of shockwave frequencies of 30 and 60 shocks per minute for kidney stones: a prospective randomized study.
Altok M; Güneş M; Umul M; Şahin AF; Baş E; Oksay T; Soyupek S
Scand J Urol; 2016 Dec; 50(6):477-482. PubMed ID: 27670851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of treatment outcomes according to output voltage during shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi: a prospective randomized multicenter study.
Park J; Kim HW; Hong S; Yang HJ; Chung H
World J Urol; 2015 May; 33(5):609-15. PubMed ID: 25387876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical and economic impact of implementation of slow shockwave lithotripsy for the treatment of urinary calculi.
Kramolowsky EV; Wang G; Butler RM; Wood NL
J Endourol; 2010 Sep; 24(9):1483-6. PubMed ID: 20653420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Arguments for choosing extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for removal of urinary tract stones.
Tiselius HG; Chaussy CG
Urolithiasis; 2015 Oct; 43(5):387-96. PubMed ID: 26315364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Extremely-slow, half-number shockwave lithotripsy for asymptomatic renal stones <20 mm.
Ito K; Takahashi T; Kanno T; Okada T; Higashi Y; Yamada H
Investig Clin Urol; 2021 Jan; 62(1):72-78. PubMed ID: 33314807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Routine Antibiotic Prophylaxis Is Not Required for Patients Undergoing Shockwave Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a National Shockwave Lithotripsy Database in New Zealand.
Alexander CE; Gowland S; Cadwallader J; Hopkins D; Reynard JM; Turney BW
J Endourol; 2016 Nov; 30(11):1233-1238. PubMed ID: 27700145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
