These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31814343)

  • 1. The Accuracy of Sonographic Assessment for Fetal Weight: Technicians versus Ultrasound-Certified Physicians.
    Rottenstreich A; Yanai N; Yagel S; Porat S
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2019 Dec; 21(12):801-805. PubMed ID: 31814343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Different formulas, different thresholds and different performance-the prediction of macrosomia by ultrasound.
    Aviram A; Yogev Y; Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Danon D; Hadar E; Gabbay-Benziv R
    J Perinatol; 2017 Dec; 37(12):1285-1291. PubMed ID: 28906497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Ultrasound macrosomic fetal weight estimation formula using maternal weight measurements].
    Murlewska J; Pietryga M; Wender-Ozegowska E
    Ginekol Pol; 2011 Feb; 82(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 21574483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy and precision of sonographic fetal weight estimation in Sweden.
    Lindström L; Cnattingius S; Axelsson O; Granfors M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2023 Jun; 102(6):699-707. PubMed ID: 36964980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight: development of new model and assessment of performance of previous models.
    Hammami A; Mazer Zumaeta A; Syngelaki A; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 29611251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fetal biacromial diameter as a new ultrasound measure for prediction of macrosomia in term pregnancy: a prospective observational study.
    Youssef AEA; Amin AF; Khalaf M; Khalaf MS; Ali MK; Abbas AM
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Aug; 32(16):2674-2679. PubMed ID: 29478363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of sonographic fetal weight estimation formulas in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes.
    Warshafsky C; Ronzoni S; Quaglietta P; Weiner E; Zaltz A; Barrett J; Melamed N; Aviram A
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Feb; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33607956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Macrosomia: a new formula for optimized fetal weight estimation.
    Hart NC; Hilbert A; Meurer B; Schrauder M; Schmid M; Siemer J; Voigt M; Schild RL
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jan; 35(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 20034003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus.
    Abramowicz JS; Robischon K; Cox C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of fundal height measurement and sonographically measured fetal abdominal circumference in the prediction of high and low birth weight at term.
    Kayem G; Grangé G; Bréart G; Goffinet F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 34(5):566-71. PubMed ID: 19582801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prenatal prediction of postnatal large-for-dates neonates using a simplified MRI method: comparison with conventional 2D ultrasound estimates.
    Kadji C; Cannie MM; De Angelis R; Camus M; Klass M; Fellas S; Cecotti V; Dütemeyer V; Jani JC
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 52(2):250-257. PubMed ID: 28508549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sonographic fetal weight estimation in prolonged pregnancy: comparative study of two- and three-dimensional methods.
    Lindell G; Marsál K
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 33(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 19180582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of large-for-gestational-age neonate by routine third-trimester ultrasound.
    Khan N; Ciobanu A; Karampitsakos T; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 54(3):326-333. PubMed ID: 31236963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of birthweight and risk of macrosomia in pregnancies complicated by diabetes.
    Shulman Y; Shah BR; Berger H; Yoon EW; Helpaerin I; Mei-Dan E; Aviram A; Retnakaran R; Melamed N
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Aug; 5(8):101042. PubMed ID: 37286100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-Versus Two-Dimensional Sonographic Biometry for Predicting Birth Weight and Macrosomia in Diabetic Pregnancies.
    Tuuli MG; Kapalka K; Macones GA; Cahill AG
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Sep; 35(9):1925-30. PubMed ID: 27466257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The birth weight of macrosomia influence the accuracy of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight at term.
    Song J; Liu J; Liu L; Jiang Y; Zheng H; Ke H; Yang L; Zhang Z
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2022 Sep; 50(7):967-973. PubMed ID: 35716368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks' gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates.
    Ciobanu A; Khan N; Syngelaki A; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 53(6):761-768. PubMed ID: 30883981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concordance Rates Between Resident-Performed Ultrasound Measurements and Certified Sonographer Measurements.
    Gregory Ward D; Bolaños R; Blaskiewicz RJ; Xiao T; Gavard JA
    J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Sep; 38(9):2389-2394. PubMed ID: 30666673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ultrasonographic Fetal Weight Estimation: Should Macrosomia-Specific Formulas Be Utilized?
    Porter B; Neely C; Szychowski J; Owen J
    Am J Perinatol; 2015 Aug; 32(10):968-72. PubMed ID: 25730134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Significant deviations in sonographic fetal weight estimation: causes and implications.
    Krispin E; Dreyfuss E; Fischer O; Wiznitzer A; Hadar E; Bardin R
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Dec; 302(6):1339-1344. PubMed ID: 32748053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.