These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31815085)

  • 1. A double-blinded randomised controlled trial - do subcuticular non-absorbable skin sutures have a better aesthetic outcome than skin staples in large wound closures?
    Agilinko J; Tan P
    GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW; 2019; 8():Doc16. PubMed ID: 31815085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Absorbable subcuticular staples versus suture for caesarean section closure: a randomised clinical trial.
    Madsen AM; Dow ML; Lohse CM; Tessmer-Tuck JA
    BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):502-510. PubMed ID: 30461155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A prospective randomised comparison of 2 skin closure techniques in primary total hip arthroplasty surgery.
    Rui M; Zheng X; Sun SS; Li CY; Zhang XC; Guo KJ; Zhao FC; Pang Y
    Hip Int; 2018 Jan; 28(1):101-105. PubMed ID: 29148019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after open gastrointestinal surgery: a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.
    Tsujinaka T; Yamamoto K; Fujita J; Endo S; Kawada J; Nakahira S; Shimokawa T; Kobayashi S; Yamasaki M; Akamaru Y; Miyamoto A; Mizushima T; Shimizu J; Umeshita K; Ito T; Doki Y; Mori M;
    Lancet; 2013 Sep; 382(9898):1105-12. PubMed ID: 24075050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subcuticular Sutures Versus Staples for Wound Closure in Open Liver Resection: A Randomised Clinical Trial.
    Matsuno Y; Yamazaki S; Mitsuka Y; Abe H; Moriguchi M; Higaki T; Takayama T
    World J Surg; 2021 Feb; 45(2):571-580. PubMed ID: 33104835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cosmetic outcomes and patient satisfaction compared between staples and subcuticular suture technique for wound closure after primary total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.
    Nepal S; Ruangsomboon P; Udomkiat P; Unnanuntana A
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2020 Sep; 140(9):1255-1263. PubMed ID: 32424445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of absorbable subcuticular staples, continuous subcuticular absorbable suture, and percutaneous metal skin staples on infection in contaminated wounds.
    Pineros-Fernandez A; Salopek LS; Rodeheaver PF; Rodeheaver G
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2012; 22(2):145-55. PubMed ID: 23428250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A revolutionary advance in skin closure compared to current methods.
    Piñeros-Fernandez A; Salopek LS; Rodeheaver PF; Drake DB; Edlich RF; Rodeheaver GT
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2006; 16(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 16566742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
    Zaki MN; Wing DA; McNulty JA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 218(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 29474843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of aesthetic outcome between tissue adhesive and subcuticular suture in thyroidectomy wound closure in a multiracial country: A randomized controlled trial.
    Teoh LY; Chong SS; Hoh SY; Teoh MS; Ng KL
    Asian J Surg; 2019 May; 42(5):634-640. PubMed ID: 30446424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized Comparison of Subcuticular Sutures Versus Staples for Skin Closure After Open Abdominal Surgery: a Multicenter Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Imamura K; Adachi K; Sasaki R; Monma S; Shioiri S; Seyama Y; Miura M; Morikawa Y; Kaneko T
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2016 Dec; 20(12):2083-2092. PubMed ID: 27699563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome in a randomized study of cesarean skin closure.
    Fleisher J; Khalifeh A; Pettker C; Berghella V; Dabbish N; Mackeen AD
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Nov; 32(22):3830-3835. PubMed ID: 29739243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wound Complication Rates After Staples or Suture for Midline Vertical Skin Closure in Obese Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Kuroki LM; Mullen MM; Massad LS; Wu N; Liu J; Mutch DG; Powell MA; Hagemann AR; Thaker PH; McCourt CK; Novetsky AP
    Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 130(1):91-99. PubMed ID: 28594761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incidence of wound complications in cesarean deliveries following closure with absorbable subcuticular staples versus conventional skin closure techniques.
    Schrufer-Poland TL; Ruiz MP; Kassar S; Tomassian C; Algren SD; Yeast JD
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Nov; 206():53-56. PubMed ID: 27632411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Aesthetic Comparison between Subcuticular Suture and Staple Closure of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Incision Scars: A Prospective Controlled Single-blinded Trial.
    Rajamand S; Kakos D; Tong D; Garmo L; Soo TM
    Cureus; 2019 Feb; 11(2):e3996. PubMed ID: 30989005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure in patients undergoing abdominal surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Feng J; Jiang X; Zhi Z
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251022. PubMed ID: 33945574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized controlled trial comparing cosmetic outcome after skin closure with 'staples' or 'subcuticular sutures' in emergency cesarean section.
    Sharma C; Verma A; Soni A; Thusoo M; Mahajan VK; Verma S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Oct; 290(4):655-9. PubMed ID: 24816689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications.
    Patel SV; Paskar DD; Nelson RL; Vedula SS; Steele SR
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Nov; 11(11):CD005661. PubMed ID: 29099149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of gross and histologic tissue responses of skin incisions closed by use of absorbable subcuticular staples, cutaneous metal staples, and polyglactin 910 suture in pigs.
    Fick JL; Novo RE; Kirchhof N
    Am J Vet Res; 2005 Nov; 66(11):1975-84. PubMed ID: 16334959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.