These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31815644)

  • 1. Principles and procedures for data and safety monitoring in pragmatic clinical trials.
    Simon GE; Shortreed SM; Rossom RC; Penfold RB; Sperl-Hillen JAM; O'Connor P
    Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):690. PubMed ID: 31815644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Data monitoring committees for pragmatic clinical trials.
    Ellenberg SS; Culbertson R; Gillen DL; Goodman S; Schrandt S; Zirkle M
    Clin Trials; 2015 Oct; 12(5):530-6. PubMed ID: 26374679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The ethical challenges raised in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: an interview study with key stakeholders.
    Nicholls SG; Carroll K; Zwarenstein M; Brehaut JC; Weijer C; Hey SP; Goldstein CE; Graham ID; Grimshaw JM; McKenzie JE; Fergusson DA; Taljaard M;
    Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):765. PubMed ID: 31870433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facing the Realities of Pragmatic Design Choices in Environmental Health Studies: Experiences from the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial.
    Checkley W; Hossen S; Rosa G; Thompson LM; McCracken JP; Diaz-Artiga A; Balakrishnan K; Simkovich SM; Underhill LJ; Nicolaou L; Hartinger SM; Davila-Roman VG; Kirby MA; Clasen TF; Rosenthal J; Peel JL; On Behalf Of Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Hapin Investigators
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Mar; 19(7):. PubMed ID: 35409475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The importance of decision intent within descriptions of pragmatic trials.
    Nicholls SG; Zwarenstein M; Hey SP; Giraudeau B; Campbell MK; Taljaard M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Sep; 125():30-37. PubMed ID: 32422248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A dynamic application of PRECIS-2 to evaluate implementation in a pragmatic, cluster randomized clinical trial in two nursing home systems.
    Palmer JA; Mor V; Volandes AE; McCreedy E; Loomer L; Carter P; Dvorchak F; Mitchell SL
    Trials; 2018 Aug; 19(1):453. PubMed ID: 30134976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Responding to signals of mental and behavioral health risk in pragmatic clinical trials: Ethical obligations in a healthcare ecosystem.
    Ali J; Morain SR; O'Rourke PP; Wilfond B; O'Brien EC; Zigler CK; Staman KL; Weinfurt KP; Sugarman J
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2022 Feb; 113():106651. PubMed ID: 34998990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stakeholder views regarding ethical issues in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: study protocol.
    Nicholls SG; Carroll K; Brehaut J; Weijer C; Hey SP; Goldstein CE; Zwarenstein M; Graham ID; McKenzie JE; McIntyre L; Jairath V; Campbell MK; Grimshaw JM; Fergusson DA; Taljaard M
    BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Nov; 19(1):90. PubMed ID: 30458809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ethical responsibilities toward indirect and collateral participants in pragmatic clinical trials.
    Smalley JB; Merritt MW; Al-Khatib SM; McCall D; Staman KL; Stepnowsky C
    Clin Trials; 2015 Oct; 12(5):476-84. PubMed ID: 26374687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Framing the conversation: use of PRECIS-2 ratings to advance understanding of pragmatic trial design domains.
    Lipman PD; Loudon K; Dluzak L; Moloney R; Messner D; Stoney CM
    Trials; 2017 Nov; 18(1):532. PubMed ID: 29126437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Could phase 3 medicine trials be tagged as pragmatic? A case study: The Salford COPD trial.
    Dal-Ré R
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2018 Feb; 24(1):258-261. PubMed ID: 28685913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How study designs influence comparative effectiveness outcomes: the case of oral versus long-acting injectable antipsychotic treatments for schizophrenia.
    Alphs L; Schooler N; Lauriello J
    Schizophr Res; 2014 Jul; 156(2-3):228-32. PubMed ID: 24842538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An analysis reveals differences between pragmatic and explanatory diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Bossuyt PM; Olsen M; Hyde C; Cohen JF
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jan; 117():29-35. PubMed ID: 31561014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. CHARTing a Path to Pragmatic Tobacco Treatment Research.
    Cruvinel E; Richter KP; Stoney C; Duffy S; Fellows J; Harrington KF; Rigotti NA; Sherman S; Tindle HA; Shireman TI; Shelley D; Waiwaiole L; Cummins S
    Am J Prev Med; 2016 Oct; 51(4):630-6. PubMed ID: 27647063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pragmatic trial design elements showed a different impact on trial interpretation and feasibility than explanatory elements.
    Nieuwenhuis JB; Irving E; Oude Rengerink K; Lloyd E; Goetz I; Grobbee DE; Stolk P; Groenwold RH; Zuidgeest MG;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Sep; 77():95-100. PubMed ID: 27164273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Real-world evidence: How pragmatic are randomized controlled trials labeled as pragmatic?
    Dal-Ré R; Janiaud P; Ioannidis JPA
    BMC Med; 2018 Apr; 16(1):49. PubMed ID: 29615035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pragmatic clinical trial design in emergency medicine: Study considerations and design types.
    Gettel CJ; Yiadom MYAB; Bernstein SL; Grudzen CR; Nath B; Li F; Hwang U; Hess EP; Melnick ER
    Acad Emerg Med; 2022 Oct; 29(10):1247-1257. PubMed ID: 35475533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developing a framework for the ethical design and conduct of pragmatic trials in healthcare: a mixed methods research protocol.
    Taljaard M; Weijer C; Grimshaw JM; Ali A; Brehaut JC; Campbell MK; Carroll K; Edwards S; Eldridge S; Forrest CB; Giraudeau B; Goldstein CE; Graham ID; Hemming K; Hey SP; Horn AR; Jairath V; Klassen TP; London AJ; Marlin S; Marshall JC; McIntyre L; McKenzie JE; Nicholls SG; Alison Paprica P; Zwarenstein M; Fergusson DA
    Trials; 2018 Sep; 19(1):525. PubMed ID: 30261933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pilot and feasibility studies for pragmatic trials have unique considerations and areas of uncertainty.
    Chan CL; Taljaard M; Lancaster GA; Brehaut JC; Eldridge SM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Oct; 138():102-114. PubMed ID: 34229091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.