260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31815748)
1. Flexible ureteroscopy: reuse? Or is single use the new direction?
Ventimiglia E; Somani BK; Traxer O
Curr Opin Urol; 2020 Mar; 30(2):113-119. PubMed ID: 31815748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost comparison of single-use versus reusable flexible ureteroscope: A systematic review.
Ventimiglia E; Godínez AJ; Traxer O; Somani BK
Turk J Urol; 2020 Nov; 46(Supp. 1):S40-S45. PubMed ID: 32877637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retrospective Cost Analysis of a Single-Center Reusable Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Program: A Comparative Cost Simulation of Disposable fURS as an Alternative.
Ozimek T; Schneider MH; Hupe MC; Wiessmeyer JR; Cordes J; Chlosta PL; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW
J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1226-1230. PubMed ID: 29073769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscopes: How Do They Compare with Reusable Ureteroscopes?
Scotland KB; Chan JYH; Chew BH
J Endourol; 2019 Feb; 33(2):71-78. PubMed ID: 30612446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Single use flexible ureteroscopes: a review of current technologies and cost effectiveness analysis.
Talyshinskii A; Gauhar V; Castellani D; Knoll T; Shah K; Wan SP; Somani BK
Curr Opin Urol; 2024 Mar; 34(2):110-115. PubMed ID: 37962372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can the introduction of single-use flexible ureteroscopes increase the longevity of reusable flexible ureteroscopes at a high volume centre?
Ventimiglia E; Smyth N; Doizi S; Jiménez Godínez A; Barghouthy Y; Corrales Acosta MA; Kamkoum H; Somani B; Traxer O
World J Urol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):251-256. PubMed ID: 34424373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis.
Hennessey DB; Fojecki GL; Papa NP; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D
BJU Int; 2018 May; 121 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 29656467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative medico-economic study of reusable vs. single-use flexible ureteroscopes.
Al-Balushi K; Martin N; Loubon H; Baboudjian M; Michel F; Sichez PC; Martin T; Di-Crocco E; Gaillet S; Delaporte V; Akiki A; Faure A; Karsenty G; Lechevallier E; Boissier R
Int Urol Nephrol; 2019 Oct; 51(10):1735-1741. PubMed ID: 31317310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Micro-Costing Analysis Demonstrates Comparable Costs for LithoVue Compared to Reusable Flexible Fiberoptic Ureteroscopes.
Taguchi K; Usawachintachit M; Tzou DT; Sherer BA; Metzler I; Isaacson D; Stoller ML; Chi T
J Endourol; 2018 Apr; 32(4):267-273. PubMed ID: 29239227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Single use versus reusable digital flexible ureteroscopes: A prospective comparative study.
Kam J; Yuminaga Y; Beattie K; Ling KY; Arianayagam M; Canagasingham B; Ferguson R; Varol C; Khadra M; Winter M; Ko R
Int J Urol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):999-1005. PubMed ID: 31448473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single-use
Bragaru M; Multescu R; Georgescu D; Bulai C; Ene C; Popescu R; Geavlete P; Geavlete B
J Med Life; 2023 Jan; 16(1):10-15. PubMed ID: 36873117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficiency of retrograde intrarenal surgery in lower pole stones: disposable flexible ureterorenoscope or reusable flexible ureterorenoscope?
Göger YE; Özkent MS; Kılınç MT; Taşkapu HH; Göger E; Aydın A; Sönmez MG; Karalezli G
World J Urol; 2021 Sep; 39(9):3643-3650. PubMed ID: 33738574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Use and Reusable Flexible Ureteroscopes for Renal Stone Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Jun DY; Cho KS; Jeong JY; Moon YJ; Kang DH; Jung HD; Lee JY
Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Oct; 58(10):. PubMed ID: 36295549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Economic Implications of a Reusable Flexible Digital Ureteroscope: A Cost-Benefit Analysis.
Martin CJ; McAdams SB; Abdul-Muhsin H; Lim VM; Nunez-Nateras R; Tyson MD; Humphreys MR
J Urol; 2017 Mar; 197(3 Pt 1):730-735. PubMed ID: 27693449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Current Disposable Ureteroscopes: Performance and Limitations in a Standardized Kidney Model.
Schlager D; Obaid MA; Hein S; Wilhelm K; Schönthaler M; Gratzke C; Miernik A; Schoeb DS
J Endourol; 2020 Oct; 34(10):1015-1020. PubMed ID: 32475165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Device profile of the LithoVue single-use digital flexible ureteroscope in the removal of kidney stones: overview of safety and efficacy.
Forbes CM; Lundeen C; Beebe S; Moore JP; Knudsen BE; Humphreys MR; Chew B
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2020 Dec; 17(12):1257-1264. PubMed ID: 33307869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Single-use flexible ureteropyeloscopy: a systematic review.
Davis NF; Quinlan MR; Browne C; Bhatt NR; Manecksha RP; D'Arcy FT; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton DM
World J Urol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):529-536. PubMed ID: 29177820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Prospective Case-Control Study Comparing LithoVue, a Single-Use, Flexible Disposable Ureteroscope, with Flexible, Reusable Fiber-Optic Ureteroscopes.
Usawachintachit M; Isaacson DS; Taguchi K; Tzou DT; Hsi RS; Sherer BA; Stoller ML; Chi T
J Endourol; 2017 May; 31(5):468-475. PubMed ID: 28287823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comprehensive literature-based equation to compare cost-effectiveness of a flexible ureteroscopy program with single-use versus reusable devices.
Marchini GS; Torricelli FC; Batagello CA; Monga M; Vicentini FC; Danilovic A; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Mazzucchi E
Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(4):658-670. PubMed ID: 31397987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Next-Generation Single-Use Ureteroscopes: An In Vitro Comparison.
Tom WR; Wollin DA; Jiang R; Radvak D; Simmons WN; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1301-1306. PubMed ID: 28978227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
