BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31816504)

  • 1. Objective function based ranking method for selection of optimal beam angles in IMRT.
    Ramar N; Meher SR; Ranganathan V; Perumal B; Kumar P; Anto GJ; Etti SH
    Phys Med; 2020 Jan; 69():44-51. PubMed ID: 31816504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An uncertainty-incorporated method for fast beam angle selection in intensity-modulated proton therapy.
    Ramar N; Meher SR
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2023; 19(3):688-696. PubMed ID: 37470595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Algorithm and performance of a clinical IMRT beam-angle optimization system.
    Djajaputra D; Wu Q; Wu Y; Mohan R
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Oct; 48(19):3191-212. PubMed ID: 14579860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A simple geometric algorithm to predict optimal starting gantry angles using equiangular-spaced beams for intensity modulated radiation therapy of prostate cancer.
    Potrebko PS; McCurdy BM; Butler JB; El-Gubtan AS; Nugent Z
    Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3951-61. PubMed ID: 17985640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An experimental investigation on the effect of beam angle optimization on the reduction of beam numbers in IMRT of head and neck tumors.
    Narayanan VK; Vaitheeswaran R; Bhangle JR; Basu S; Maiya V; Zade B
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 13(4):3912. PubMed ID: 22766955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
    Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An algorithm for fast beam angle selection in intensity modulated radiotherapy.
    Vaitheeswaran R; Narayanan VK; Bhangle JR; Nirhali A; Kumar N; Basu S; Maiya V
    Med Phys; 2010 Dec; 37(12):6443-52. PubMed ID: 21302800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automatic learning-based beam angle selection for thoracic IMRT.
    Amit G; Purdie TG; Levinshtein A; Hope AJ; Lindsay P; Marshall A; Jaffray DA; Pekar V
    Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1992-2005. PubMed ID: 25832090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dosimetric comparison of manual and beam angle optimization of gantry angles in IMRT.
    Srivastava SP; Das IJ; Kumar A; Johnstone PA
    Med Dosim; 2011; 36(3):313-6. PubMed ID: 20817436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of methods for beam angle optimization for IMRT using an accelerated exhaustive search strategy.
    Wang X; Zhang X; Dong L; Liu H; Wu Q; Mohan R
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(4):1325-37. PubMed ID: 15519806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. iCycle: Integrated, multicriterial beam angle, and profile optimization for generation of coplanar and noncoplanar IMRT plans.
    Breedveld S; Storchi PR; Voet PW; Heijmen BJ
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):951-63. PubMed ID: 22320804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
    Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integrated multicriterial optimization of beam angles and intensity profiles for coplanar and noncoplanar head and neck IMRT and implications for VMAT.
    Voet PW; Breedveld S; Dirkx ML; Levendag PC; Heijmen BJ
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4858-65. PubMed ID: 22894412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. TBS-BAO: fully automated beam angle optimization for IMRT guided by a total-beam-space reference plan.
    Schipaanboord BWK; Heijmen BJM; Breedveld S
    Phys Med Biol; 2022 Jan; 67(3):. PubMed ID: 35026742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comprehensive formulation for volumetric modulated arc therapy planning.
    Nguyen D; Lyu Q; Ruan D; O'Connor D; Low DA; Sheng K
    Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4263. PubMed ID: 27370141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A dosimetric comparison of the use of equally spaced beam (ESB), beam angle optimization (BAO), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in head and neck cancers treated by intensity modulated radiotherapy.
    Leung WS; Wu VWC; Liu CYW; Cheng ACK
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 20(11):121-130. PubMed ID: 31593367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conical beam geometry intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
    Schüler E; Wang L; Loo BW; Maxim PG
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jun; 64(12):125014. PubMed ID: 31125980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lung IMRT planning with automatic determination of beam angle configurations.
    Yuan L; Zhu W; Ge Y; Jiang Y; Sheng Y; Yin FF; Wu QJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 63(13):135024. PubMed ID: 29846178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the beam direction search space in computerized non-coplanar beam angle optimization for IMRT-prostate SBRT.
    Rossi L; Breedveld S; Heijmen BJ; Voet PW; Lanconelli N; Aluwini S
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Sep; 57(17):5441-58. PubMed ID: 22864234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for pancreatic and prostate cancer using pulsed low-dose rate delivery techniques.
    Li J; Lang J; Wang P; Kang S; Lin MH; Chen X; Chen F; Guo M; Chen L; Ma CM
    Med Dosim; 2014; 39(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 25087084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.