These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31816537)

  • 41. Radiology peer-review feedback scorecards: optimizing transparency, accessibility, and education in a children׳s hospital.
    Iyer RS; Munsell A; Weinberger E
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2014; 43(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 24948210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Focused peer review: the end game of peer review.
    Hussain S; Hussain JS; Karam A; Vijayaraghavan G
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Jun; 9(6):430-3.e1. PubMed ID: 22632671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Perspectives from the other side of the screen: how clinicians and radiologists communicate about diagnostic errors.
    Lama A; Hogg J; Olson APJ
    Diagnosis (Berl); 2020 Jan; 7(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 31539352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Learning from errors in radiology to improve patient safety.
    Saeed SA; Masroor I; Shafqat G
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2013 Oct; 23(10):691-4. PubMed ID: 24112251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Error review: can this improve reporting performance?
    Tudor GR; Finlay DB
    Clin Radiol; 2001 Sep; 56(9):751-4. PubMed ID: 11585397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Learning from diagnostic errors: a good way to improve education in radiology.
    Pinto A; Acampora C; Pinto F; Kourdioukova E; Romano L; Verstraete K
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Jun; 78(3):372-6. PubMed ID: 21255952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Fundamentals of Diagnostic Error in Imaging.
    Itri JN; Tappouni RR; McEachern RO; Pesch AJ; Patel SH
    Radiographics; 2018 Oct; 38(6):1845-1865. PubMed ID: 30303801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Quality Initiative Program in Its Sixth Year: Has It Become Part of Our Radiology Culture?
    Ritchie H; Kielar AZ; Hill F; O'Sullivan JP
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2017 Aug; 68(3):243-248. PubMed ID: 28159436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. CAR Peer Learning Guide.
    Torres FS; Costa AF; Kagoma YK; Arrigan M; Scott M; Yemen B; Hurrell C; Kielar A
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2022 Aug; 73(3):491-498. PubMed ID: 35077247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Integration of Peer Review in PACS Results in a Marked Increase in the Discrepancies Reported.
    Yacoub JH; Obara P; Bova D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):613-617. PubMed ID: 31846375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Meaningful Peer Review in Radiology: A Review of Current Practices and Potential Future Directions.
    Moriarity AK; Hawkins CM; Geis JR; Dreyer KJ; Kamer AP; Khandheria P; Morey J; Whitfill J; Wiggins RH; Itri JN
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Dec; 13(12 Pt A):1519-1524. PubMed ID: 28233533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Improving Performance of Mammographic Breast Positioning in an Academic Radiology Practice.
    Pal S; Ikeda DM; Jesinger RA; Mickelsen LJ; Chen CA; Larson DB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Apr; 210(4):807-815. PubMed ID: 29412019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Transition From Peer Review to Peer Learning: Experience in a Radiology Department.
    Donnelly LF; Dorfman SR; Jones J; Bisset GS
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Aug; 15(8):1143-1149. PubMed ID: 29055610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Anonymity Decreases the Punitive Nature of a Departmental Morbidity and Mortality Conference.
    Jansson PS; Schuur JD; Baker O; Hagan SC; Nadel ES; Aaronson EL
    J Patient Saf; 2019 Dec; 15(4):e86-e89. PubMed ID: 30444742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. ACR RADPEER Committee White Paper with 2016 Updates: Revised Scoring System, New Classifications, Self-Review, and Subspecialized Reports.
    Goldberg-Stein S; Frigini LA; Long S; Metwalli Z; Nguyen XV; Parker M; Abujudeh H
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2017 Aug; 14(8):1080-1086. PubMed ID: 28551339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Peer Learning Program Metrics: A Pediatric Neuroradiology Example.
    Kadom N; Reddy KM; Khanna G; Simoneaux SF; Allen JW; Heilbrun ME
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2022 Nov; 43(11):1680-1684. PubMed ID: 36229162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Peer review comments augment diagnostic error characterization and departmental quality assurance: 1-year experience from a children's hospital.
    Iyer RS; Swanson JO; Otto RK; Weinberger E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jan; 200(1):132-7. PubMed ID: 23255752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Quality--a radiology imperative: interpretation accuracy and pertinence.
    Lee JK
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Mar; 4(3):162-5. PubMed ID: 17412256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Classification of Error in Abdominal Imaging: Pearls and Pitfalls for Radiologists.
    Egri C; Darras KE; Scali EP; Harris AC
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2018 Nov; 69(4):409-416. PubMed ID: 30318459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Quality assurance in radiology: peer review and peer feedback.
    Strickland NH
    Clin Radiol; 2015 Nov; 70(11):1158-64. PubMed ID: 26223739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.