282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31817011)
21. Multiple attribute group decision-making based on interval-valued q-rung orthopair uncertain linguistic power Muirhead mean operators and linguistic scale functions.
Xu Y; Liu S; Wang J
PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258772. PubMed ID: 34673796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The Multi-Attribute Group Decision-Making Method Based on Interval Grey Trapezoid Fuzzy Linguistic Variables.
Yin K; Wang P; Li X
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Dec; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 29236071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Additive manufacturing process selection for automotive industry using Pythagorean fuzzy CRITIC EDAS.
Menekse A; Ertemel AV; Camgoz Akdag H; Gorener A
PLoS One; 2023; 18(3):e0282676. PubMed ID: 36893100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A hybrid DEMATEL-COPRAS method using interval-valued probabilistic linguistic term set for sustainable hydrogen fuel cell supplier of new energy vehicles.
Mao Q; Chen J; Lv J; Guo M; Tian M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jun; 30(29):74236-74264. PubMed ID: 37204570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Linguistic Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making with Risk Preferences and Its Use in Low-Carbon Tourism Destination Selection.
Lin H; Wang ZJ
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Sep; 14(9):. PubMed ID: 28926985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The research for PLTS normalization method based on minimum entropy change and its application in MAGDM problem.
Wu S; Chen X
PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0268158. PubMed ID: 35522688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Intuitionistic linguistic weighted Bonferroni mean operator and its application to multiple attribute decision making.
Liu P; Rong L; Chu Y; Li Y
ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():545049. PubMed ID: 25045737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Multivalued neutrosophic power partitioned Hamy mean operators and their application in MAGDM.
Wang M; Li T; Tian Y; Zhang K
PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0281734. PubMed ID: 36791133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Hesitant 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic multi-criteria decision-making method based on correlation measures.
Sajjad M; Sałabun W; Faizi S; Ismail M
PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0270414. PubMed ID: 35944009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An interaction and feedback mechanism-based group decision-making for emergency medical supplies supplier selection using T-spherical fuzzy information.
Gurmani SH; Zhang Z; Zulqarnain RM; Askar S
Sci Rep; 2023 May; 13(1):8726. PubMed ID: 37253823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. 2-tuple linguistic Fermatean fuzzy MAGDM based on the WASPAS method for selection of solid waste disposal location.
Akram M; Ali U; Santos-García G; Niaz Z
Math Biosci Eng; 2023 Jan; 20(2):3811-3837. PubMed ID: 36899606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Supplier selection mechanism in electric coal procurement under sustainability.
Wang C; Du X; Rao C
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Oct; 28(37):51674-51692. PubMed ID: 33988842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A collaborative emergency decision making approach based on BWM and TODIM under interval 2-tuple linguistic environment.
Qi K; Chai H; Duan Q; Du Y; Wang Q; Sun J; Liew KM
Int J Mach Learn Cybern; 2022; 13(2):383-405. PubMed ID: 34567279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. An OWA Distance-Based, Single-Valued Neutrosophic Linguistic TOPSIS Approach for Green Supplier Evaluation and Selection in Low-Carbon Supply Chains.
Chen J; Zeng S; Zhang C
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Jul; 15(7):. PubMed ID: 29986549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Group Decision-Making Using Pythagorean Fuzzy Entropy and the Complex Proportional Assessment.
Thakur P; Kizielewicz B; Gandotra N; Shekhovtsov A; Saini N; Sałabun W
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jun; 22(13):. PubMed ID: 35808377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Supplier selection in the industry 4.0 era by using a fuzzy cognitive map and hesitant fuzzy linguistic VIKOR methodology.
Hosseini Dolatabad A; Heidary Dahooie J; Antucheviciene J; Azari M; Razavi Hajiagha SH
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(18):52923-52942. PubMed ID: 36843168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Utility Set and Its Application in Selection of Fire Rescue Plans.
Liao H; Si G; Xu Z; Fujita H
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Apr; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 29614019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Green supplier selection for textile industry: a case study using BWM-TODIM integration under interval type-2 fuzzy sets.
Celik E; Yucesan M; Gul M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Dec; 28(45):64793-64817. PubMed ID: 34313933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Linguistic Z-number weighted averaging operators and their application to portfolio selection problem.
Mahmoodi AH; Sadjadi SJ; Sadi-Nezhad S; Soltani R; Movahedi Sobhani F
PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227307. PubMed ID: 31971992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Aggregation operators of neutrosophic linguistic numbers for multiple attribute group decision making.
Ye J
Springerplus; 2016; 5(1):1691. PubMed ID: 27777845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
