These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

697 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31818748)

  • 1. Environmental mitigation hierarchy and biodiversity offsets revisited through habitat connectivity modelling.
    Bergès L; Avon C; Bezombes L; Clauzel C; Duflot R; Foltête JC; Gaucherand S; Girardet X; Spiegelberger T
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Feb; 256():109950. PubMed ID: 31818748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maximizing habitat connectivity in the mitigation hierarchy. A case study on three terrestrial mammals in an urban environment.
    Tarabon S; Bergès L; Dutoit T; Isselin-Nondedeu F
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Aug; 243():340-349. PubMed ID: 31103679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pooling biodiversity offsets to improve habitat connectivity and species conservation.
    Tarabon S; Dutoit T; Isselin-Nondedeu F
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Jan; 277():111425. PubMed ID: 33017721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three ways to deliver a net positive impact with biodiversity offsets.
    Moilanen A; Kotiaho JS
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Feb; 35(1):197-205. PubMed ID: 32390216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Environmental impact assessment of development projects improved by merging species distribution and habitat connectivity modelling.
    Tarabon S; Bergès L; Dutoit T; Isselin-Nondedeu F
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Jul; 241():439-449. PubMed ID: 30975576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The inclusion of biodiversity in environmental impact assessment: Policy-related progress limited by gaps and semantic confusion.
    Bigard C; Pioch S; Thompson JD
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Sep; 200():35-45. PubMed ID: 28554125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Landscape typology and ecological connectivity assessment to inform Greenway design.
    Carlier J; Moran J
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 651(Pt 2):3241-3252. PubMed ID: 30463172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing effects of land use on landscape connectivity: loss and fragmentation of western U.S. forests.
    Theobald DM; Crooks KR; Norman JB
    Ecol Appl; 2011 Oct; 21(7):2445-58. PubMed ID: 22073634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Amphibian habitat network planning based on the graph theory: A case study of
    Zhang L; He L; Yan F; Chen YH
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2021 Mar; 32(3):1054-1060. PubMed ID: 33754572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantifying the impact of vegetation-based metrics on species persistence when choosing offsets for habitat destruction.
    Marshall E; Valavi R; Connor LO; Cadenhead N; Southwell D; Wintle BA; Kujala H
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Apr; 35(2):567-577. PubMed ID: 32720732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Landscape ecological assessment: a tool for integrating biodiversity issues in strategic environmental assessment and planning.
    Mörtberg UM; Balfors B; Knol WC
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Mar; 82(4):457-70. PubMed ID: 16574306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating offsets for avian displacement effects of anthropogenic impacts.
    Shaffer JA; Loesch CR; Buhl DA
    Ecol Appl; 2019 Dec; 29(8):e01983. PubMed ID: 31348559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiscale connectivity and graph theory highlight critical areas for conservation under climate change.
    Dilt TE; Weisberg PJ; Leitner P; Matocq MD; Inman RD; Nussear KE; Esque TC
    Ecol Appl; 2016 Jun; 26(4):1223-37. PubMed ID: 27509760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the potential of biodiversity offsets to achieve net gain.
    Souza BA; Rosa JCS; Campos PBR; Sánchez LE
    Conserv Biol; 2023 Aug; 37(4):e14094. PubMed ID: 37021395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When is an Offset Not an Offset? A Framework of Necessary Conditions for Biodiversity Offsets.
    Pope J; Morrison-Saunders A; Bond A; Retief F
    Environ Manage; 2021 Feb; 67(2):424-435. PubMed ID: 33481092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Applying network theory to prioritize multispecies habitat networks that are robust to climate and land-use change.
    Albert CH; Rayfield B; Dumitru M; Gonzalez A
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Dec; 31(6):1383-1396. PubMed ID: 28383758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ecological Equivalence Assessment Methods: What Trade-Offs between Operationality, Scientific Basis and Comprehensiveness?
    Bezombes L; Gaucherand S; Kerbiriou C; Reinert ME; Spiegelberger T
    Environ Manage; 2017 Aug; 60(2):216-230. PubMed ID: 28493017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mining and biodiversity offsets: a transparent and science-based approach to measure "no-net-loss".
    Virah-Sawmy M; Ebeling J; Taplin R
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Oct; 143():61-70. PubMed ID: 24866419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing habitat connectivity for ground-dwelling animals in an urban environment.
    Braaker S; Moretti M; Boesch R; Ghazoul J; Obrist MK; Bontadina F
    Ecol Appl; 2014; 24(7):1583-95. PubMed ID: 29210224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving marine biodiversity offsetting: A proposed methodology for better assessing losses and gains.
    Bas A; Jacob C; Hay J; Pioch S; Thorin S
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Jun; 175():46-59. PubMed ID: 27019359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.