These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31819806)

  • 21. Perceptions of Chinese Biomedical Researchers Towards Academic Misconduct: A Comparison Between 2015 and 2010.
    Liao QJ; Zhang YY; Fan YC; Zheng MH; Bai Y; Eslick GD; He XX; Zhang SB; Xia HH; He H
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Apr; 24(2):629-645. PubMed ID: 28397174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Developing a Collaborative Agenda for Humanities and Social Scientific Research on Laboratory Animal Science and Welfare.
    Davies GF; Greenhough BJ; Hobson-West P; Kirk RG; Applebee K; Bellingan LC; Berdoy M; Buller H; Cassaday HJ; Davies K; Diefenbacher D; Druglitrø T; Escobar MP; Friese C; Herrmann K; Hinterberger A; Jarrett WJ; Jayne K; Johnson AM; Johnson ER; Konold T; Leach MC; Leonelli S; Lewis DI; Lilley EJ; Longridge ER; McLeod CM; Miele M; Nelson NC; Ormandy EH; Pallett H; Poort L; Pound P; Ramsden E; Roe E; Scalway H; Schrader A; Scotton CJ; Scudamore CL; Smith JA; Whitfield L; Wolfensohn S
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158791. PubMed ID: 27428071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Perceptions of plagiarism by biomedical researchers: an online survey in Europe and China.
    Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Jun; 21(1):44. PubMed ID: 32487190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Research Misconduct in the Fields of Ethics and Philosophy: Researchers' Perceptions in Spain.
    Feenstra RA; Delgado López-Cózar E; Pallarés-Domínguez D
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2021 Jan; 27(1):1. PubMed ID: 33492516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers?
    Al-Khatib A; Teixeira da Silva JA
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Feb; 25(1):293-321. PubMed ID: 28905258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Barriers and Motivators to Using Human Tissues for Research: The Views of UK-Based Biomedical Researchers.
    Lawrence E; Sims J; Gander A; Garibaldi JM; Fuller B; Davidson B; Quinlan PR
    Biopreserv Biobank; 2020 Aug; 18(4):266-273. PubMed ID: 32551838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Astrobiology and society: building an interdisciplinary research community.
    Race M; Denning K; Bertka CM; Dick SJ; Harrison AA; Impey C; Mancinelli R;
    Astrobiology; 2012 Oct; 12(10):958-65. PubMed ID: 23046203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impact of humanities and social sciences curriculum in an undergraduate medical education programme.
    Ghias K; Khan KS; Ali R; Azfar S; Ahmed R
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2020 Sep; 70(9):1516-1522. PubMed ID: 33040100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Chinese villages and their sustainable future: the European Union-China-Research Project "SUCCESS".
    Dumreicher H
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Apr; 87(2):204-15. PubMed ID: 17888563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Public engagement by researchers of different disciplines in Singapore: A qualitative comparison of macro- and meso-level concerns.
    Ho SS; Looi J; Leung YW; Goh TJ
    Public Underst Sci; 2020 Feb; 29(2):211-229. PubMed ID: 31778090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. How researchers perceive research misconduct in biomedicine and how they would prevent it: A qualitative study in a small scientific community.
    Buljan I; Barać L; Marušić A
    Account Res; 2018; 25(4):220-238. PubMed ID: 29637796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Academic research integrity: Exploring researchers' perceptions of responsibilities and enablers.
    Huybers T; Greene B; Rohr DH
    Account Res; 2020 Apr; 27(3):146-177. PubMed ID: 32073893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Investigating disagreement in the scientific literature.
    Lamers WS; Boyack K; Larivière V; Sugimoto CR; van Eck NJ; Waltman L; Murray D
    Elife; 2021 Dec; 10():. PubMed ID: 34951588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The stability of co-authorship structures.
    Cugmas M; Ferligoj A; Kronegger L
    Scientometrics; 2016; 106(1):163-186. PubMed ID: 27840460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Integrity in Biomedical Research: A Systematic Review of Studies in China.
    Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Aug; 25(4):1271-1301. PubMed ID: 29721845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Explaining variance in perceived research misbehavior: results from a survey among academic researchers in Amsterdam.
    Haven T; Tijdink J; Martinson B; Bouter L; Oort F
    Res Integr Peer Rev; 2021 May; 6(1):7. PubMed ID: 33941288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Challenging perceptions of disciplinary divide: an ethnographer's experience of collegiality, collaboration and crisis.
    van der Wiel R
    Med Humanit; 2018 Dec; 44(4):e2. PubMed ID: 30482823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. To Tweet or Not to Tweet: A Longitudinal Analysis of Social Media Use by Global Diabetes Researchers.
    Leigh S; Noble ME; Pearson FE; Iremonger J; Williams DT
    Pharmaceut Med; 2021 Nov; 35(6):353-365. PubMed ID: 34874534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Chinese graduate students' perceptions of plagiarism: A mixed-methods study.
    Shen Y; Hu G
    Account Res; 2021 May; 28(4):197-225. PubMed ID: 32877216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Authorship, plagiarism and conflict of interest: views and practices from low/middle-income country health researchers.
    Rohwer A; Young T; Wager E; Garner P
    BMJ Open; 2017 Nov; 7(11):e018467. PubMed ID: 29170291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.