151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31819852)
1. Cortical Bone Trajectory Screws for Fixation Across the Cervicothoracic Junction: Surgical Technique and Outcomes.
Obeidat M; Tan Z; Finkelstein JA
Global Spine J; 2019 Dec; 9(8):859-865. PubMed ID: 31819852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Posterior cervicothoracic instrumentation in spine tumors.
Mazel C; Hoffmann E; Antonietti P; Grunenwald D; Henry M; Williams J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jun; 29(11):1246-53. PubMed ID: 15167665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Which salvage fixation technique is best for the failed initial screw fixation at the cervicothoracic junction? A biomechanical comparison study.
Hong JT; Tomoyuki T; Jain A; Orías AAE; Inoue N; An HS
Eur Spine J; 2017 Sep; 26(9):2417-2424. PubMed ID: 28752245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Crossing the Cervicothoracic Junction: A Review of the Current Literature.
Vickery JW; Varas EE; Abtahi AM
Clin Spine Surg; 2022 Dec; 35(10):451-457. PubMed ID: 36447350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lateral mass screw-rod fixation of the cervical spine: a prospective clinical series with 1-year follow-up.
Deen HG; Birch BD; Wharen RE; Reimer R
Spine J; 2003; 3(6):489-95. PubMed ID: 14609694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiographic feasibility study of cortical bone trajectory and traditional pedicle screw dual trajectories.
Mullin JP; Perlmutter B; Schmidt E; Benzel E; Steinmetz MP
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):727-732. PubMed ID: 27391396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of spinal instrumentation on kinematics at the cervicothoracic junction: emphasis on soft-tissue response in an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Kretzer RM; Hu N; Umekoji H; Sciubba DM; Jallo GI; McAfee PC; Tortolani PJ; Cunningham BW
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Oct; 13(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 20887140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgical challenges in posterior cervicothoracic junction instrumentation.
Balestrino A; Gondar R; Jannelli G; Zona G; Tessitore E
Neurosurg Rev; 2021 Dec; 44(6):3447-3458. PubMed ID: 33754193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical comparison of translaminar versus pedicle screws at T1 and T2 in long subaxial cervical constructs.
McGirt MJ; Sutter EG; Xu R; Sciubba DM; Wolinsky JP; Witham TF; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A
Neurosurgery; 2009 Dec; 65(6 Suppl):167-72; discussion 172. PubMed ID: 19934991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Freehand Pedicle Screw Placement Using a Universal Entry Point and Sagittal and Axial Trajectory for All Subaxial Cervical, Thoracic and Lumbosacral Spines.
Zhang ZF
Orthop Surg; 2020 Feb; 12(1):141-152. PubMed ID: 31828963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How I do it: tapered rod placement across the cervicothoracic junction for augmented posterior constructs.
Clifton W; Damon A; Pichelmann M
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2019 Dec; 161(12):2429-2431. PubMed ID: 31696301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Placement of pedicle screws in the human cadaveric cervical spine: comparative accuracy of three techniques.
Ludwig SC; Kramer DL; Balderston RA; Vaccaro AR; Foley KF; Albert TJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jul; 25(13):1655-67. PubMed ID: 10870141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility and safety of using thoracic and lumbar cortical bone trajectory pedicle screws in spinal constructs in children: technical note.
Sellin JN; Raskin JS; Staggers KA; Brayton A; Briceño V; Moreno AJ; Jea A
J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2018 Feb; 21(2):190-196. PubMed ID: 29148922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Three Different Options for C7 Posterior Vertebral Anchor in the Indian Population-Lateral Mass, Pedicle, and Lamina: A Computed Tomography-Based Morphometric Analysis.
Viswanathan VK; Subramanian S; Viswanathan S
Asian Spine J; 2018 Aug; 12(4):726-733. PubMed ID: 30060383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pedicle instrumentation in the thoracic spine. A morphometric and cadaveric study for placement of screws.
Cinotti G; Gumina S; Ripani M; Postacchini F
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Jan; 24(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 9926379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cortical Bone Trajectory for Thoracic Pedicle Screws: A Technical Note.
Matsukawa K; Yato Y; Hynes RA; Imabayashi H; Hosogane N; Asazuma T; Matsui T; Kobayashi Y; Nemoto K
Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Jun; 30(5):E497-E504. PubMed ID: 28525468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of upper thoracic pedicle screw placement using three-dimensional image guidance.
Bledsoe JM; Fenton D; Fogelson JL; Nottmeier EW
Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):817-21. PubMed ID: 19664966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervicothoracic junction kyphosis: surgical reconstruction with pedicle subtraction osteotomy and Smith-Petersen osteotomy. Presented at the 2009 Joint Spine Section Meeting. Clinical article.
Samudrala S; Vaynman S; Thiayananthan T; Ghostine S; Bergey DL; Anand N; Pashman RS; Johnson JP
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Dec; 13(6):695-706. PubMed ID: 21121746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Paravertebral foramen screw fixation for posterior cervical spine fusion: biomechanical study and description of a novel technique.
Maki S; Aramomi M; Matsuura Y; Furuya T; Ota M; Iijima Y; Saito J; Suzuki T; Mannoji C; Takahashi K; Yamazaki M; Koda M
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):415-420. PubMed ID: 28498072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Novel free-hand T1 pedicle screw method: Review of 44 consecutive cases.
Rivkin MA; Okun JF; Yocom SS
J Neurosci Rural Pract; 2014 Oct; 5(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 25288835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
