216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31820156)
1. Minimally invasive hepatectomy is associated with decreased morbidity and resource utilization in the elderly.
Tee MC; Chen L; Peightal D; Franko J; Kim PT; Brahmbhatt RD; Raman S; Scudamore CH; Chung SW; Segedi M
Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):5030-5040. PubMed ID: 31820156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimal-invasive versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison of postoperative outcomes and long-term survivals using propensity score matching analysis.
Andreou A; Struecker B; Raschzok N; Krenzien F; Haber P; Wabitsch S; Waldbaur C; Touet EM; Eichelberg AC; Atanasov G; Biebl M; Bahra M; Öllinger R; Schmelzle M; Pratschke J
Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 27(4):751-758. PubMed ID: 30449503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Changing trends and outcomes associated with the adoption of minimally invasive hepatectomy: a contemporary single-institution experience with 400 consecutive resections.
Goh BKP; Lee SY; Teo JY; Kam JH; Jeyaraj PR; Cheow PC; Chow PKH; Ooi LLPJ; Chung AYF; Chan CY
Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4658-4665. PubMed ID: 29967997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Textbook outcome in liver surgery: open vs minimally invasive hepatectomy among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Endo Y; Tsilimigras DI; Munir MM; Woldesenbet S; Yang J; Katayama E; Guglielmi A; Ratti F; Marques HP; Cauchy F; Lam V; Poultsides GA; Kitago M; Popescu I; Alexandrescu S; Martel G; Gleisner A; Hugh T; Aldrighetti L; Shen F; Endo I; Pawlik TM
J Gastrointest Surg; 2024 Apr; 28(4):417-424. PubMed ID: 38583891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing Outcomes of Minimally Invasive and Open Hepatectomy for Primary Liver Malignancies in Patients with Low-MELD Cirrhosis.
Wehrle CJ; Woo K; Raj R; Chang J; Stackhouse KA; Dahdaleh F; Augustin T; Joyce D; Simon R; Kim J; Aucejo F; Walsh RM; Kwon DCH; Pawlik TM; Naffouje SA
J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Nov; 27(11):2424-2433. PubMed ID: 37620660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictors and implications of unplanned conversion during minimally invasive hepatectomy: an analysis of the ACS-NSQIP database.
Stiles ZE; Behrman SW; Glazer ES; Deneve JL; Dong L; Wan JY; Dickson PV
HPB (Oxford); 2017 Nov; 19(11):957-965. PubMed ID: 28760630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic Hepatectomy (with or without Robotic Assistance) versus Radiofrequency Ablation as a Minimally Invasive Treatment for Very Early-Stage or Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Chong CC; Lee KF; Chu CM; Chan AW; Yu SC; Lai PB
Dig Surg; 2020; 37(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 30917378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Role of Drain Placement in Major Hepatectomy: A NSQIP Analysis of Procedure-Targeted Hepatectomy Cases.
Shwaartz C; Fields AC; Aalberg JJ; Divino CM
World J Surg; 2017 Apr; 41(4):1110-1118. PubMed ID: 27738836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. National Trends and Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic-assisted Hepatectomy in the USA: A Propensity-score Matched Analysis from the National Cancer Database.
Kamel MK; Tuma F; Keane CA; Blebea J
World J Surg; 2022 Jan; 46(1):189-196. PubMed ID: 34528104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incidence, associated risk factors, and impact of conversion to laparotomy in elective minimally invasive sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease.
Bastawrous AL; Landmann RG; Liu Y; Liu E; Cleary RK
Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):598-609. PubMed ID: 31062152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Robotic and Laparoscopic Right and Extended Right Hepatectomy.
Chong CC; Fuks D; Lee KF; Zhao JJ; Choi GH; Sucandy I; Chiow AKH; Marino MV; Gastaca M; Wang X; Lee JH; Efanov M; Kingham TP; D'Hondt M; Troisi RI; Choi SH; Sutcliffe RP; Chan CY; Lai ECH; Park JO; Di Benedetto F; Rotellar F; Sugioka A; Coelho FF; Ferrero A; Long TCD; Lim C; Scatton O; Liu Q; Schmelzle M; Pratschke J; Cheung TT; Liu R; Han HS; Tang CN; Goh BKP;
JAMA Surg; 2022 May; 157(5):436-444. PubMed ID: 35262660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic vs. open liver resection for hepatocellular adenoma: a multicenter propensity score adjustment analysis by the AFC-HCA-2013 study group.
Landi F; De' Angelis N; Scatton O; Vidal X; Ayav A; Muscari F; Dokmak S; Torzilli G; Demartines N; Soubrane O; Cherqui D; Hardwigsen J; Laurent A
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4136-4144. PubMed ID: 28281121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally Invasive Hepatectomy in North America: Laparoscopic Versus Robotic.
Fagenson AM; Gleeson EM; Pitt HA; Lau KN
J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Jan; 25(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 32583323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of non-liver-related previous abdominal surgery on the difficulty of minimally invasive liver resections: a propensity score-matched controlled study.
Chong Y; Koh YX; Teo JY; Cheow PC; Chow PK; Chung AY; Chan CY; Goh BKP
Surg Endosc; 2022 Jan; 36(1):591-597. PubMed ID: 33569726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally Invasive vs. Open Hepatectomy: a Comparative Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
Bagante F; Spolverato G; Strasberg SM; Gani F; Thompson V; Hall BL; Bentrem DJ; Pitt HA; Pawlik TM
J Gastrointest Surg; 2016 Sep; 20(9):1608-17. PubMed ID: 27412321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients: a multi-centre propensity score-based analysis.
Nomi T; Hirokawa F; Kaibori M; Ueno M; Tanaka S; Hokuto D; Noda T; Nakai T; Ikoma H; Iida H; Komeda K; Ishizaki M; Hayami S; Eguchi H; Matsumoto M; Morimura R; Maehira H; Sho M; Kubo S
Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):658-666. PubMed ID: 31093748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A propensity score matched analysis of robotic and open hepatectomy for treatment of liver tumors. Clinical outcomes, oncological survival, and costs comparison.
Rayman S; Sucandy I; Ross SB; Crespo K; Syblis C; Rosemurgy A
J Robot Surg; 2023 Oct; 17(5):2399-2407. PubMed ID: 37428364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison Between Minimally Invasive Right Anterior and Right Posterior Sectionectomy vs Right Hepatectomy: An International Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched and Coarsened-Exact-Matched Analysis of 1,100 Patients.
Willems E; D'Hondt M; Kingham TP; Fuks D; Choi GH; Syn NL; Sucandy I; Marino MV; Prieto M; Chong CC; Lee JH; Efanov M; Chiow AKH; Choi SH; Sutcliffe RP; Troisi RI; Pratschke J; Cheung TT; Wang X; Tang CN; Liu R; Han HS; Goh BKP;
J Am Coll Surg; 2022 Dec; 235(6):859-868. PubMed ID: 36102506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of survival and post-operation outcomes for minimally invasive versus open hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of case-matched studies.
Fu B; Zhang JR; Han PS; Zhang YM
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():1021804. PubMed ID: 36338679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-Term Oncological Safety of Minimally Invasive Hepatectomy in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Case-Control Study.
Chang SK; Tay CW; Shen L; Iyer SG; Kow AW; Madhavan K
Ann Acad Med Singap; 2016 Mar; 45(3):91-7. PubMed ID: 27146461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
