These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31820156)

  • 1. Minimally invasive hepatectomy is associated with decreased morbidity and resource utilization in the elderly.
    Tee MC; Chen L; Peightal D; Franko J; Kim PT; Brahmbhatt RD; Raman S; Scudamore CH; Chung SW; Segedi M
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):5030-5040. PubMed ID: 31820156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimal-invasive versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison of postoperative outcomes and long-term survivals using propensity score matching analysis.
    Andreou A; Struecker B; Raschzok N; Krenzien F; Haber P; Wabitsch S; Waldbaur C; Touet EM; Eichelberg AC; Atanasov G; Biebl M; Bahra M; Öllinger R; Schmelzle M; Pratschke J
    Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 27(4):751-758. PubMed ID: 30449503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changing trends and outcomes associated with the adoption of minimally invasive hepatectomy: a contemporary single-institution experience with 400 consecutive resections.
    Goh BKP; Lee SY; Teo JY; Kam JH; Jeyaraj PR; Cheow PC; Chow PKH; Ooi LLPJ; Chung AYF; Chan CY
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4658-4665. PubMed ID: 29967997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Textbook outcome in liver surgery: open vs minimally invasive hepatectomy among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Endo Y; Tsilimigras DI; Munir MM; Woldesenbet S; Yang J; Katayama E; Guglielmi A; Ratti F; Marques HP; Cauchy F; Lam V; Poultsides GA; Kitago M; Popescu I; Alexandrescu S; Martel G; Gleisner A; Hugh T; Aldrighetti L; Shen F; Endo I; Pawlik TM
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2024 Apr; 28(4):417-424. PubMed ID: 38583891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing Outcomes of Minimally Invasive and Open Hepatectomy for Primary Liver Malignancies in Patients with Low-MELD Cirrhosis.
    Wehrle CJ; Woo K; Raj R; Chang J; Stackhouse KA; Dahdaleh F; Augustin T; Joyce D; Simon R; Kim J; Aucejo F; Walsh RM; Kwon DCH; Pawlik TM; Naffouje SA
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Nov; 27(11):2424-2433. PubMed ID: 37620660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictors and implications of unplanned conversion during minimally invasive hepatectomy: an analysis of the ACS-NSQIP database.
    Stiles ZE; Behrman SW; Glazer ES; Deneve JL; Dong L; Wan JY; Dickson PV
    HPB (Oxford); 2017 Nov; 19(11):957-965. PubMed ID: 28760630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The minimally invasive approach confers improved outcomes in frail cancer patients undergoing hepatectomy: an American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis.
    Al Abbas AI; Kuchta K; Talamonti MS; Hogg ME
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2024 Jul; 28(7):1017-1026. PubMed ID: 38574963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic Hepatectomy (with or without Robotic Assistance) versus Radiofrequency Ablation as a Minimally Invasive Treatment for Very Early-Stage or Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Chong CC; Lee KF; Chu CM; Chan AW; Yu SC; Lai PB
    Dig Surg; 2020; 37(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 30917378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Role of Drain Placement in Major Hepatectomy: A NSQIP Analysis of Procedure-Targeted Hepatectomy Cases.
    Shwaartz C; Fields AC; Aalberg JJ; Divino CM
    World J Surg; 2017 Apr; 41(4):1110-1118. PubMed ID: 27738836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. National Trends and Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic-assisted Hepatectomy in the USA: A Propensity-score Matched Analysis from the National Cancer Database.
    Kamel MK; Tuma F; Keane CA; Blebea J
    World J Surg; 2022 Jan; 46(1):189-196. PubMed ID: 34528104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incidence, associated risk factors, and impact of conversion to laparotomy in elective minimally invasive sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease.
    Bastawrous AL; Landmann RG; Liu Y; Liu E; Cleary RK
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):598-609. PubMed ID: 31062152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Robotic and Laparoscopic Right and Extended Right Hepatectomy.
    Chong CC; Fuks D; Lee KF; Zhao JJ; Choi GH; Sucandy I; Chiow AKH; Marino MV; Gastaca M; Wang X; Lee JH; Efanov M; Kingham TP; D'Hondt M; Troisi RI; Choi SH; Sutcliffe RP; Chan CY; Lai ECH; Park JO; Di Benedetto F; Rotellar F; Sugioka A; Coelho FF; Ferrero A; Long TCD; Lim C; Scatton O; Liu Q; Schmelzle M; Pratschke J; Cheung TT; Liu R; Han HS; Tang CN; Goh BKP;
    JAMA Surg; 2022 May; 157(5):436-444. PubMed ID: 35262660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic vs. open liver resection for hepatocellular adenoma: a multicenter propensity score adjustment analysis by the AFC-HCA-2013 study group.
    Landi F; De' Angelis N; Scatton O; Vidal X; Ayav A; Muscari F; Dokmak S; Torzilli G; Demartines N; Soubrane O; Cherqui D; Hardwigsen J; Laurent A
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4136-4144. PubMed ID: 28281121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally Invasive Hepatectomy in North America: Laparoscopic Versus Robotic.
    Fagenson AM; Gleeson EM; Pitt HA; Lau KN
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Jan; 25(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 32583323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of non-liver-related previous abdominal surgery on the difficulty of minimally invasive liver resections: a propensity score-matched controlled study.
    Chong Y; Koh YX; Teo JY; Cheow PC; Chow PK; Chung AY; Chan CY; Goh BKP
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Jan; 36(1):591-597. PubMed ID: 33569726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally Invasive vs. Open Hepatectomy: a Comparative Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
    Bagante F; Spolverato G; Strasberg SM; Gani F; Thompson V; Hall BL; Bentrem DJ; Pitt HA; Pawlik TM
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2016 Sep; 20(9):1608-17. PubMed ID: 27412321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients: a multi-centre propensity score-based analysis.
    Nomi T; Hirokawa F; Kaibori M; Ueno M; Tanaka S; Hokuto D; Noda T; Nakai T; Ikoma H; Iida H; Komeda K; Ishizaki M; Hayami S; Eguchi H; Matsumoto M; Morimura R; Maehira H; Sho M; Kubo S
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):658-666. PubMed ID: 31093748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A propensity score matched analysis of robotic and open hepatectomy for treatment of liver tumors. Clinical outcomes, oncological survival, and costs comparison.
    Rayman S; Sucandy I; Ross SB; Crespo K; Syblis C; Rosemurgy A
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Oct; 17(5):2399-2407. PubMed ID: 37428364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multicenter propensity score-matched analysis to compare perioperative morbidity after laparoscopic or robotic complex hepatectomy for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Huang XK; Lu WF; Liu SY; Fu TW; Jin L; Du CF; Gao ZY; Wang KD; Dai MG; Zhong ZH; Ye TW; Xiao ZQ; Cheng J; Shen GL; Liu J; Liu JW; Huang DS; Liang L; Zhang CW
    HPB (Oxford); 2024 Aug; 26(8):1062-1071. PubMed ID: 38830783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison Between Minimally Invasive Right Anterior and Right Posterior Sectionectomy vs Right Hepatectomy: An International Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched and Coarsened-Exact-Matched Analysis of 1,100 Patients.
    Willems E; D'Hondt M; Kingham TP; Fuks D; Choi GH; Syn NL; Sucandy I; Marino MV; Prieto M; Chong CC; Lee JH; Efanov M; Chiow AKH; Choi SH; Sutcliffe RP; Troisi RI; Pratschke J; Cheung TT; Wang X; Tang CN; Liu R; Han HS; Goh BKP;
    J Am Coll Surg; 2022 Dec; 235(6):859-868. PubMed ID: 36102506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.