316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31820161)
1. Trends and outcomes of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers in the USA: maintaining perioperative and oncologic safety.
Konstantinidis IT; Ituarte P; Woo Y; Warner SG; Melstrom K; Kim J; Singh G; Lee B; Fong Y; Melstrom LG
Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4932-4942. PubMed ID: 31820161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evolving application of minimally invasive cancer operations at a tertiary cancer center.
Selby LV; DeMatteo RP; Tholey RM; Jarnagin WR; Garcia-Aguilar J; Strombom PD; Allen PJ; Kingham TP; Weiser MR; Brennan MF; Strong VE
J Surg Oncol; 2017 Mar; 115(4):365-370. PubMed ID: 28299807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Superior pathologic and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection, compared to open resection.
Lee GC; Bordeianou LG; Francone TD; Blaszkowsky LS; Goldstone RN; Ricciardi R; Kunitake H; Qadan M
Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3435-3448. PubMed ID: 31844971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Colectomies Using a Large National Database: Outcomes and Trends Related to Surgery Center Volume.
Yeo HL; Isaacs AJ; Abelson JS; Milsom JW; Sedrakyan A
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Jun; 59(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 27145311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Trends and outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST).
Gevorkian J; Le E; Alvarado L; Davis B; Tyroch A; Chiba S; Konstantinidis IT
Surg Endosc; 2022 Sep; 36(9):6841-6850. PubMed ID: 35048188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robot-Assisted Abdominoperineal Resection: Clinical, Pathologic, and Oncologic Outcomes.
Eftaiha SM; Pai A; Sulo S; Park JJ; Prasad LM; Marecik SJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Jul; 59(7):607-14. PubMed ID: 27270512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Oncologic and Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic, Open, and Robotic Approaches for Rectal Cancer Resection: A Multicenter, Propensity Score-Weighted Cohort Study.
Kethman WC; Harris AHS; Morris AM; Shelton A; Kirilcuk N; Kin C
Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Jan; 63(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 31764247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Hospital Type Drives Utilization and Outcomes.
Villano AM; Zeymo A; Houlihan BK; Bayasi M; Al-Refaie WB; Chan KS
J Surg Res; 2020 Mar; 247():180-189. PubMed ID: 31753556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally invasive gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A national perspective on oncologic outcomes and overall survival.
Leung K; Sun Z; Nussbaum DP; Adam MA; Worni M; Blazer DG
Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 26(3):324-330. PubMed ID: 28807254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy for stage I-III colon cancer: oncologic and long-term survival outcomes.
Mirkin KA; Kulaylat AS; Hollenbeak CS; Messaris E
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jun; 32(6):2894-2901. PubMed ID: 29273877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: the American experience.
Greenleaf EK; Sun SX; Hollenbeak CS; Wong J
Gastric Cancer; 2017 Mar; 20(2):368-378. PubMed ID: 26961133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Abdominoperineal Resections in Patients With Rectal Cancer.
Moghadamyeghaneh Z; Phelan M; Smith BR; Stamos MJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Dec; 58(12):1123-9. PubMed ID: 26544808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A population-based study comparing laparoscopic and robotic outcomes in colorectal surgery.
Tam MS; Kaoutzanis C; Mullard AJ; Regenbogen SE; Franz MG; Hendren S; Krapohl G; Vandewarker JF; Lampman RM; Cleary RK
Surg Endosc; 2016 Feb; 30(2):455-463. PubMed ID: 25894448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Perioperative and Early Oncologic Outcomes between Open and Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy in a Contemporary Population Based Cohort.
Pearce SM; Pariser JJ; Karrison T; Patel SG; Eggener SE
J Urol; 2016 Jul; 196(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 26860793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A National Perspective on Short-term Oncologic Outcomes.
Speicher PJ; Englum BR; Ganapathi AM; Nussbaum DP; Mantyh CR; Migaly J
Ann Surg; 2015 Dec; 262(6):1040-5. PubMed ID: 25405559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Growth in robotic-assisted procedures is from conversion of laparoscopic procedures and not from open surgeons' conversion: a study of trends and costs.
Armijo PR; Pagkratis S; Boilesen E; Tanner T; Oleynikov D
Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):2106-2113. PubMed ID: 29067582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcomes in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection compared to open: a propensity-matched analysis of the NCDB (2010-2015).
Chapman BC; Edgcomb M; Gleisner A; Vogel JD
Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4754-4771. PubMed ID: 31728754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Impact of Conversion to Laparotomy in Rectal Cancer : A National Cancer Database Analysis of 57 574 Patients.
Parascandola SA; Hota S; Tampo MMT; Sparks AD; Obias V
Am Surg; 2020 Jul; 86(7):811-818. PubMed ID: 32683917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Effects of robotic and laparoscopic-assisted surgery on lymph node dissection and short-term outcomes in patients with Siewert II adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction].
Wang D; Cao S; Tan X; Liu S; Liu X; Niu Z; Chen D; Wang D; Zhang J; Lv L; Li Y; Jiang H; Guo D; Li Y; Li Z; Zhou Y
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 22(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 30799538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
