BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31820494)

  • 1. A retrospective comparison of waterbirth outcomes in two United States hospital settings.
    Bailey JM; Zielinski RE; Emeis CL; Kane Low L
    Birth; 2020 Mar; 47(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 31820494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative study between the pioneer cohort of waterbirths and conventional vaginal deliveries in an obstetrician-led unit in Singapore.
    Lim KM; Tong PS; Chong YS
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jun; 55(3):363-7. PubMed ID: 27343316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcomes of Waterbirth in a US Hospital-Based Midwifery Practice: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Water Immersion During Labor and Birth.
    Neiman E; Austin E; Tan A; Anderson CM; Chipps E
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2020 Mar; 65(2):216-223. PubMed ID: 31489975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Waterbirth: a national retrospective cohort study of factors associated with its use among women in England.
    Aughey H; Jardine J; Moitt N; Fearon K; Hawdon J; Pasupathy D; Urganci I; ; Harris T
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Mar; 21(1):256. PubMed ID: 33771115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Hospital-Based Deliveries With Water Immersion.
    Sidebottom AC; Vacquier M; Simon K; Wunderlich W; Fontaine P; Dahlgren-Roemmich D; Steinbring S; Hyer B; Saul L
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Oct; 136(4):707-715. PubMed ID: 32925614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maternal and neonatal outcomes following waterbirth: a cohort study of 17 530 waterbirths and 17 530 propensity score-matched land births.
    Bovbjerg ML; Cheyney M; Caughey AB
    BJOG; 2022 May; 129(6):950-958. PubMed ID: 34773367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Water Birth Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Among Midwifery Clients in Alberta, Canada, from 2014 to 2017: A Retrospective Study.
    Jacoby S; Becker G; Crawford S; Wilson RD
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Jun; 41(6):805-812. PubMed ID: 30904342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Waterbirth: an integrative analysis of peer-reviewed literature.
    Nutter E; Meyer S; Shaw-Battista J; Marowitz A
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(3):286-319. PubMed ID: 24850284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maternal and Newborn Outcomes Following Waterbirth: The Midwives Alliance of North America Statistics Project, 2004 to 2009 Cohort.
    Bovbjerg ML; Cheyney M; Everson C
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2016; 61(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 26789485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of waterbirth on neonatal mortality and morbidity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Davies R; Davis D; Pearce M; Wong N
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Oct; 13(10):180-231. PubMed ID: 26571292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Waterbirth in Sweden - a comparative study.
    Ulfsdottir H; Saltvedt S; Georgsson S
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Mar; 97(3):341-348. PubMed ID: 29288489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic review and meta-analysis to examine intrapartum interventions, and maternal and neonatal outcomes following immersion in water during labour and waterbirth.
    Burns E; Feeley C; Hall PJ; Vanderlaan J
    BMJ Open; 2022 Jul; 12(7):e056517. PubMed ID: 35790327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maternal and perinatal outcomes amongst low risk women giving birth in water compared to six birth positions on land. A descriptive cross sectional study in a birth centre over 12 years.
    Dahlen HG; Dowling H; Tracy M; Schmied V; Tracy S
    Midwifery; 2013 Jul; 29(7):759-64. PubMed ID: 22884894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maternal and neonatal outcome of births planned in alongside midwifery units: a cohort study from a tertiary center in Germany.
    Merz WM; Tascon-Padron L; Puth MT; Heep A; Tietjen SL; Schmid M; Gembruch U
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 May; 20(1):267. PubMed ID: 32375692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective cohort study comparing neonatal outcomes of waterbirth and land birth in an Australian tertiary maternity unit.
    Seed E; Kearney L; Weaver E; Ryan EG; Nugent R
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2023 Feb; 63(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 35796252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The perceptions and experiences of women who achieved and did not achieve a waterbirth.
    Lewis L; Hauck YL; Crichton C; Barnes C; Poletti C; Overing H; Keyes L; Thomson B
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Jan; 18(1):23. PubMed ID: 29320998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Incidence of and Predictors for Severe Perineal Trauma and Intact Perineum in Women Having a Waterbirth in England: A Hospital-Based Study.
    Papoutsis D; Antonakou A; Gornall A; Tzavara C
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2021 May; 30(5):681-688. PubMed ID: 32907460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Midwifery and Obstetric Care in Low-Risk Hospital Births.
    Souter V; Nethery E; Kopas ML; Wurz H; Sitcov K; Caughey AB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 134(5):1056-1065. PubMed ID: 31599830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomised controlled trial in comparing maternal and neonatal outcomes between hands-and-knees delivery position and supine position in China.
    Zhang H; Huang S; Guo X; Zhao N; Lu Y; Chen M; Li Y; Wu J; Huang L; Ma F; Yang Y; Zhang X; Zhou X; Guo R; Cai W
    Midwifery; 2017 Jul; 50():117-124. PubMed ID: 28414983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perspectives on risk: Assessment of risk profiles and outcomes among women planning community birth in the United States.
    Bovbjerg ML; Cheyney M; Brown J; Cox KJ; Leeman L
    Birth; 2017 Sep; 44(3):209-221. PubMed ID: 28332220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.