919 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31821122)
21.
Kersting D; Sandach P; Sraieb M; Wiesweg M; Metzenmacher M; Darwiche K; Oezkan F; Bölükbas S; Stuschke M; Umutlu L; Nader M; Hamacher R; Fendler WP; Wienker J; Eberhardt WEE; Schuler M; Herrmann K; Hautzel H
J Nucl Med; 2023 Oct; 64(10):1540-1549. PubMed ID: 37474272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance in Lymphoma: Comparison With 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and With the Addition of Magnetic Resonance Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.
Giraudo C; Raderer M; Karanikas G; Weber M; Kiesewetter B; Dolak W; Simonitsch-Klupp I; Mayerhoefer ME
Invest Radiol; 2016 Mar; 51(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 26784400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prognostic role of baseline
Albano D; Bosio G; Camoni L; Farina M; Re A; Tucci A; Giubbini R; Bertagna F
Hematol Oncol; 2019 Feb; 37(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 30299563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Delayed
Yan H; Zhou X; Wang X; Li R; Shi Y; Xia Q; Wan L; Huang G; Liu J
Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):144-150. PubMed ID: 31407969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Whole-body uptake classification and prostate cancer staging in
Capobianco N; Sibille L; Chantadisai M; Gafita A; Langbein T; Platsch G; Solari EL; Shah V; Spottiswoode B; Eiber M; Weber WA; Navab N; Nekolla SG
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Jan; 49(2):517-526. PubMed ID: 34232350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dual-Energy Computed Tomography-Based Iodine Quantitation for Response Evaluation of Lung Cancers to Chemoradiotherapy/Radiotherapy: A Comparison With Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography-Based Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Response Evaluation Criterion in Solid Tumors.
Ren Y; Jiao Y; Ge W; Zhang L; Hua Y; Li C; Zhai W; Tang X; He W; Fang M; Zheng X
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(4):614-622. PubMed ID: 29613988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT for initial staging of nasal type natural killer/T-cell lymphoma: a comparison with conventional staging methods.
Moon SH; Cho SK; Kim WS; Kim SJ; Chan Ahn Y; Choe YS; Lee KH; Kim BT; Choi JY
J Nucl Med; 2013 Jul; 54(7):1039-44. PubMed ID: 23658217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Accuracy of F-18 FDG PET/CT with optimal cut-offs of maximum standardized uptake value according to size for diagnosis of regional lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal cancer.
Bae SU; Won KS; Song BI; Jeong WK; Baek SK; Kim HW
Cancer Imaging; 2018 Sep; 18(1):32. PubMed ID: 30217167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Radiomics based on
Ou X; Zhang J; Wang J; Pang F; Wang Y; Wei X; Ma X
Cancer Med; 2020 Jan; 9(2):496-506. PubMed ID: 31769230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Repeatability of Quantitative Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT Uptake Measures as Function of Uptake Interval and Lesion Selection in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.
Kramer GM; Frings V; Hoetjes N; Hoekstra OS; Smit EF; de Langen AJ; Boellaard R
J Nucl Med; 2016 Sep; 57(9):1343-9. PubMed ID: 27103020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Validation of Convolutional Neural Networks for Fast Determination of Whole-Body Metabolic Tumor Burden in Pediatric Lymphoma.
Etchebehere E; Andrade R; Camacho M; Lima M; Brink A; Cerci J; Nadel H; Bal C; Rangarajan V; Pfluger T; Kagna O; Alonso O; Begum FK; Mir KB; Magboo VP; Menezes LJ; Paez D; Pascual TN
J Nucl Med Technol; 2022 Sep; 50(3):256-262. PubMed ID: 35440476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessment of indeterminate pulmonary nodules detected in lung cancer screening: Diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET/CT.
Garcia-Velloso MJ; Bastarrika G; de-Torres JP; Lozano MD; Sanchez-Salcedo P; Sancho L; Nuñez-Cordoba JM; Campo A; Alcaide AB; Torre W; Richter JA; Zulueta JJ
Lung Cancer; 2016 Jul; 97():81-6. PubMed ID: 27237032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Role of
Delgado Bolton RC; Calapaquí-Terán AK; Giammarile F; Rubello D
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2019; 38(4):229-233. PubMed ID: 31202725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prediction of Lymph Node Maximum Standardized Uptake Value in Patients With Cancer Using a 3D Convolutional Neural Network: A Proof-of-Concept Study.
Shaish H; Mutasa S; Makkar J; Chang P; Schwartz L; Ahmed F
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Feb; 212(2):238-244. PubMed ID: 30540209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Bone Marrow and Tumor Radiomics at
Mattonen SA; Davidzon GA; Benson J; Leung ANC; Vasanawala M; Horng G; Shrager JB; Napel S; Nair VS
Radiology; 2019 Nov; 293(2):451-459. PubMed ID: 31526257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of
Weber M; Jentzen W; Hofferber R; Herrmann K; Fendler WP; Rischpler C; Umutlu L; Conti M; Costa PF; Sraieb M; Kersting D
BMC Cancer; 2021 Jan; 21(1):62. PubMed ID: 33446147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Tumor Delineation and Quantitative Assessment of Glucose Metabolic Rate within Histologic Subtypes of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer by Using Dynamic
Meijer TWH; de Geus-Oei LF; Visser EP; Oyen WJG; Looijen-Salamon MG; Visvikis D; Verhagen AFTM; Bussink J; Vriens D
Radiology; 2017 May; 283(2):547-559. PubMed ID: 27846378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Convolutional neural network-based program to predict lymph node metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer using
Kidera E; Koyasu S; Hirata K; Hamaji M; Nakamoto R; Nakamoto Y
Ann Nucl Med; 2024 Jan; 38(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 37755604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The diagnostic ability of
Lee JW; Kim EY; Kim DJ; Lee JH; Kang WJ; Lee JD; Yun M
Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4515-4523. PubMed ID: 26943133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Graph Neural Network Model for Prediction of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Lymph Node Metastasis Using Protein-Protein Interaction Network and
Ju H; Kim K; Kim BI; Woo SK
Int J Mol Sci; 2024 Jan; 25(2):. PubMed ID: 38255770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
