These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31821469)

  • 1. Reflection on modern methods: five myths about measurement error in epidemiological research.
    van Smeden M; Lash TL; Groenwold RHH
    Int J Epidemiol; 2020 Feb; 49(1):338-347. PubMed ID: 31821469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Measurement Error Elephant in the Room: Challenges and Solutions to Measurement Error in Epidemiology.
    Innes GK; Bhondoekhan F; Lau B; Gross AL; Ng DK; Abraham AG
    Epidemiol Rev; 2022 Jan; 43(1):94-105. PubMed ID: 34664648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The impact of incorrectly-measured variables when mixed with precisely measured variables on the study of validity in epidemiological research].
    Yang MX; Zhou YB; Jiang QW
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 28(8):810-3. PubMed ID: 18080573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Misconceptions About the Direction of Bias From Nondifferential Misclassification.
    Yland JJ; Wesselink AK; Lash TL; Fox MP
    Am J Epidemiol; 2022 Jul; 191(8):1485-1495. PubMed ID: 35231925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differential misclassification arising from nondifferential errors in exposure measurement.
    Flegal KM; Keyl PM; Nieto FJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 1991 Nov; 134(10):1233-44. PubMed ID: 1746532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correcting for the bias caused by exposure measurement error in epidemiological studies.
    Fahey MT; Forbes AB; Hodge AM
    Respirology; 2014 Oct; 19(7):979-84. PubMed ID: 25123473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accounting for response misclassification and covariate measurement error improves power and reduces bias in epidemiologic studies.
    Cheng D; Branscum AJ; Stamey JD
    Ann Epidemiol; 2010 Jul; 20(7):562-7. PubMed ID: 20538200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exposure measurement error in time-series studies of air pollution: concepts and consequences.
    Zeger SL; Thomas D; Dominici F; Samet JM; Schwartz J; Dockery D; Cohen A
    Environ Health Perspect; 2000 May; 108(5):419-26. PubMed ID: 10811568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Approaches to addressing missing values, measurement error, and confounding in epidemiologic studies.
    van Smeden M; Penning de Vries BBL; Nab L; Groenwold RHH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Mar; 131():89-100. PubMed ID: 33176189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical methods for epidemiologic studies of the health effects of air pollution.
    Navidi W; Thomas D; Langholz B; Stram D
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 1999 May; (86):1-50; discussion 51-6. PubMed ID: 10465799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of ignoring measurement error when estimating sample size for epidemiologic studies.
    Devine O
    Eval Health Prof; 2003 Sep; 26(3):315-39. PubMed ID: 12971202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When measurement errors correlate with truth: surprising effects of nondifferential misclassification.
    Wacholder S
    Epidemiology; 1995 Mar; 6(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 7742402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the Need for Quantitative Bias Analysis in the Peer-Review Process.
    Fox MP; Lash TL
    Am J Epidemiol; 2017 May; 185(10):865-868. PubMed ID: 28430833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of exposure measurement error when an exposure variable is constrained by a lower limit.
    Richardson DB; Ciampi A
    Am J Epidemiol; 2003 Feb; 157(4):355-63. PubMed ID: 12578806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dealing with dietary measurement error in nutritional cohort studies.
    Freedman LS; Schatzkin A; Midthune D; Kipnis V
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Jul; 103(14):1086-92. PubMed ID: 21653922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Misclassification and measurement error - planning a study and interpreting results.
    Alfred Frost S; Alexandrou E
    Nurse Res; 2021 Mar; 29(1):21-25. PubMed ID: 33410311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Epidemiologic analyses with error-prone exposures: review of current practice and recommendations.
    Shaw PA; Deffner V; Keogh RH; Tooze JA; Dodd KW; Küchenhoff H; Kipnis V; Freedman LS;
    Ann Epidemiol; 2018 Nov; 28(11):821-828. PubMed ID: 30316629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. SAS and R code for probabilistic quantitative bias analysis for misclassified binary variables and binary unmeasured confounders.
    Fox MP; MacLehose RF; Lash TL
    Int J Epidemiol; 2023 Oct; 52(5):1624-1633. PubMed ID: 37141446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using Sensitivity Analyses for Unobserved Confounding to Address Covariate Measurement Error in Propensity Score Methods.
    Rudolph KE; Stuart EA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 187(3):604-613. PubMed ID: 28992211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design and interpretation of studies of differential exposure measurement error.
    White E
    Am J Epidemiol; 2003 Mar; 157(5):380-7. PubMed ID: 12615602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.