These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

41 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3182214)

  • 1. Sources of error in arterial morphometric measurements.
    Roeren T; LeVeen RF; Knecht LB
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Sep; 23(9):672-6. PubMed ID: 3182214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative analysis of the coronary angiograms.
    Tung FY; Lin SL; Chang MS; Kong CW; Chiang BN; Wang SP
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1992 Jan; 49(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 1312387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automated segmentation and analysis of vascular structures in magnetic resonance angiographic images.
    de Koning PJ; Schaap JA; Janssen JP; Westenberg JJ; van der Geest RJ; Reiber JH
    Magn Reson Med; 2003 Dec; 50(6):1189-98. PubMed ID: 14648566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual interpretation compared with caliper and computerized measurements in experimental vessel stenosis.
    Yanagihara Y; Sugahara T; Fukunishi Y
    Acta Radiol; 1992 Nov; 33(6):542-5. PubMed ID: 1449877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diameters of arteries, veins, and airways in isolated dog lung.
    Horsfield K; Kemp W; Phillips S
    Anat Rec; 1986 Nov; 216(3):392-5. PubMed ID: 3789422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective evaluation of extracranial carotid stenosis: MR angiography with maximum-intensity projections and multiplanar reformation compared with conventional angiography.
    De Marco JK; Nesbit GM; Wesbey GE; Richardson D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1205-12. PubMed ID: 7976902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CT angiography with spiral CT and maximum intensity projection.
    Napel S; Marks MP; Rubin GD; Dake MD; McDonnell CH; Song SM; Enzmann DR; Jeffrey RB
    Radiology; 1992 Nov; 185(2):607-10. PubMed ID: 1410382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative coronary arteriography: design and validation.
    Ratib OM; Mankovich NJ
    Radiology; 1988 Jun; 167(3):743-7. PubMed ID: 3363133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy and precision of vessel area assessment: manual versus automatic lumen delineation based on full-width at half-maximum.
    Merkx MA; Bescós JO; Geerts L; Bosboom EM; van de Vosse FN; Breeuwer M
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Nov; 36(5):1186-93. PubMed ID: 22826150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of image-based method for extraction of coronary morphometry.
    Wischgoll T; Choy JS; Ritman EL; Kassab GS
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 36(3):356-68. PubMed ID: 18228141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative digital fluorography. Computer vs. human estimation of vascular stenoses.
    Jaques P; DiBianca F; Pizer S; Kohout F; Lifshitz L; Delany D
    Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 3884545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the efficacy of digital subtraction and film-screen angiography of the lower limb: prospective study in 50 patients.
    Smith TP; Cragg AH; Berbaum KS; Nakagawa N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):431-6. PubMed ID: 1729803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of computerized three-dimensional reconstruction of intravascular ultrasound: measurements of absolute luminal diameter and cross-sectional area in ex vivo human coronary arteries.
    Zientek DM; Rodriguez ER; Liebson PR; Parrillo JE; Kennedy HL; Klein LW
    J Invasive Cardiol; 1992 May; 4(4):179-87. PubMed ID: 10149891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Accuracy of detecting stenotic changes on coronary cineangiograms using computer image processing].
    Sugahara T; Kimura K; Maeda H
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 May; 50(5):533-8. PubMed ID: 2388821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vascular diameter measurement in CT angiography: comparison of model-based iterative reconstruction and standard filtered back projection algorithms in vitro.
    Suzuki S; Machida H; Tanaka I; Ueno E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):652-7. PubMed ID: 23436858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Virtual elastic sphere processing enables reproducible quantification of vessel stenosis at CT and MR angiography.
    Gremse F; Grouls C; Palmowski M; Lammers T; de Vries A; Grüll H; Das M; Mühlenbruch G; Akhtar S; Schober A; Kiessling F
    Radiology; 2011 Sep; 260(3):709-17. PubMed ID: 21788527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cinevideodensitometric quantification of relative coronary arterial stenosis: application to evaluating candidates for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.
    Azuma A; Furukawa K; Katsume H; Sawada T; Okada T; Tatsukawa H; Inoue N; Nakagawa T; Asayama J; Nakagawa M
    J Cardiol; 1989 Jun; 19(2):351-63. PubMed ID: 2636617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Imaging of experimental end-to-side anastomoses in a cast model.
    Riekkinen HV; Karkola KO; Kuukasjärvi P
    Eur J Surg; 2001 Dec; 167(12):893-8. PubMed ID: 11841078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy assessment of layer decomposition using simulated angiographic image sequences.
    Close RA; Abbey CK; Morioka CA; Whiting JS
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Oct; 20(10):990-8. PubMed ID: 11686445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MR imaging (including MR angiography) of abdominal aortic aneurysms: comparison with conventional angiography.
    Kaufman JA; Geller SC; Petersen MJ; Cambria RP; Prince MR; Waltman AC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):203-10. PubMed ID: 8010215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.