These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3182277)

  • 21. LiF TLD-100 as a dosimeter in high energy proton beam therapy--can it yield accurate results?
    Zullo JR; Kudchadker RJ; Zhu XR; Sahoo N; Gillin MT
    Med Dosim; 2010; 35(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 19931017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [beta-Radiation exposure with (188)Re-labelled pharmaceuticals].
    Andreeff M; Wunderlich G; Behge K; Schönmuth T; Kotzerke J
    Nuklearmedizin; 2005; 44(3):94-8. PubMed ID: 15968417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of LiF:Mg,Ti (TLD-100) for Intraoperative Electron Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance.
    Liuzzi R; Savino F; D'Avino V; Pugliese M; Cella L
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139287. PubMed ID: 26427065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Synchrotron radiation in the study of the variation of dose response in thermoluminescence dosimeters with radiation energy.
    Kron T; Smith A; Hyodo K
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1996 Dec; 19(4):225-36. PubMed ID: 9060209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dose equivalent response of a TLD badge--influence of body backscatter.
    Pradhan AS; Gambhir SP; Patel PH; Bhatt RC; Supe SJ
    Health Phys; 1990 Sep; 59(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 2394587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Selecting passive dosimetry technologies for measuring the external dose of terrestrial wildlife.
    Aramrun P; Beresford NA; Wood MD
    J Environ Radioact; 2018 Feb; 182():128-137. PubMed ID: 29227874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Using LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDs to estimate the absorbed dose to water in liquid water around an 192Ir brachytherapy source.
    Lucas PA; Aubineau-Lanièce I; Lourenço V; Vermesse D; Cutarella D
    Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011711. PubMed ID: 24387503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The LANL model 8823 whole-body TLD and associated dose algorithm.
    Hoffman JM; Mallett MW
    Health Phys; 1999 Nov; 77(5 Suppl):S96-103. PubMed ID: 10527157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Characterization of an optically stimulated dosimeter for dentomaxillofacial dosimetry.
    Valiyaparambil JV; Mallya SM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):793-7. PubMed ID: 21983291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Feasibility study of glass dosimeter for in vivo measurement: dosimetric characterization and clinical application in proton beams.
    Rah JE; Oh DH; Kim JW; Kim DH; Suh TS; Ji YH; Shin D; Lee SB; Kim DY; Park SY
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Oct; 84(2):e251-6. PubMed ID: 22658518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Acceptance Testing of Thermoluminescent Dosimeter Holders.
    Romanyukha A; Grypp MD; Sharp TJ; DiRito JN; Nelson ME; Mavrogianis ST; Torres J; Benevides LA
    Health Phys; 2018 May; 114(5):543-548. PubMed ID: 29578903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Characteristics of optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters in the spread-out Bragg peak region of clinical proton beams.
    Kerns JR; Kry SF; Sahoo N
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1854-63. PubMed ID: 22482607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dosimetry in a mammography phantom using TLD-300 dosimeters.
    Muñoz ID; Gamboa-deBuen I; Avila O; Brandan ME
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 29989176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The high dose response and functional capability of the DT-702/Pd lithium fluoride thermoluminescent dosimeter.
    Lawlor TM; Talmadge MD; Murray MM; Nelson ME; Mueller AC; Romanyukha AA; Fairchild GR; Grypp MD; Williams AS
    Health Phys; 2015 May; 108(5):514-9. PubMed ID: 25811149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A Comparison of Readings from Thermoluminescent Dosimeter Ring Badges Worn in Different Positions.
    Osborne KL; Nielsen CJ; Bullock JR; Jennings SG
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2020 Dec; 48(4):361-362. PubMed ID: 32518118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Beta skin dose determination using TLDs, Monte-Carlo calculations, and extrapolation chamber.
    Ben-Shachar B; Levine SH; Hoffman JM
    Health Phys; 1989 Dec; 57(6):917-25. PubMed ID: 2584026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Development and characterization of a three-dimensional radiochromic film stack dosimeter for megavoltage photon beam dosimetry.
    McCaw TJ; Micka JA; DeWerd LA
    Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):052104. PubMed ID: 24784393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Miniature thermoluminescent dosimeter absorbed dose measurements in tumor phantom models.
    Wessels BW; Griffith MH
    J Nucl Med; 1986 Aug; 27(8):1308-14. PubMed ID: 3734904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Beta response of LiMgPO4:Tb,B based OSL discs for personnel monitoring applications.
    Kumar M; Dhabekar B; Menon SN; Bakshi AK; Udhayakumar J; Chougaonkar MP; Mayya YS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Aug; 155(4):410-7. PubMed ID: 23440498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of ion chamber and TLD dosimetry in mammography.
    Stanton L; Day JL; Brattelli SD; Lightfoot DA; Vince MA; Stanton RE
    Med Phys; 1981; 8(6):792-8. PubMed ID: 7322077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.