601 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31822958)
1. Comparison between quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging and [
Everaars H; van Diemen PA; Bom MJ; Schumacher SP; de Winter RW; van de Ven PM; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Hofman MBM; van der Geest RJ; Götte MJ; van Rossum AC; Nijveldt R; Danad I; Driessen RS; Knaapen P
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 Jul; 47(7):1688-1697. PubMed ID: 31822958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance stress T1 mapping and [15O]H2O positron emission tomography in patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease.
Everaars H; van Diemen PA; Biesbroek PS; Hopman LHGA; Bom MJ; Schumacher SP; de Winter RW; van de Ven PM; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Hofman MBM; Nijveldt R; Götte MJ; van Rossum AC; Danad I; Driessen RS; Knaapen P
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2022 Jan; 23(2):229-237. PubMed ID: 33982071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of Revascularization on Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow as Assessed by Serial [
Driessen RS; Danad I; Stuijfzand WJ; Schumacher SP; Knuuti J; Mäki M; Lammertsma AA; van Rossum AC; van Royen N; Raijmakers PG; Knaapen P
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 May; 11(5):e007417. PubMed ID: 29703779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term impact of myocardial inflammation on quantitative myocardial perfusion-a descriptive PET/MR myocarditis study.
Buechel RR; Ciancone D; Bakula A; von Felten E; Schmidt GA; Patriki D; Gräni C; Wahl A; Manka R; Heidecker B; Benz DC; Giannopoulos AA; Pazhenkottil AP; Kaufmann PA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Oct; 50(12):3609-3618. PubMed ID: 37391545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic value of PET-measured longitudinal flow gradient for the identification of coronary artery disease.
Valenta I; Quercioli A; Schindler TH
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Apr; 7(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 24631507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improved regional myocardial blood flow and flow reserve after coronary revascularization as assessed by serial 15O-water positron emission tomography/computed tomography.
Aikawa T; Naya M; Koyanagawa K; Manabe O; Obara M; Magota K; Oyama-Manabe N; Tamaki N; Anzai T
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Jan; 21(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 31544927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feasibility and operator variability of myocardial blood flow and reserve measurements with ⁹⁹mTc-sestamibi quantitative dynamic SPECT/CT imaging.
Klein R; Hung GU; Wu TC; Huang WS; Li D; deKemp RA; Hsu B
J Nucl Cardiol; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1075-88. PubMed ID: 25280761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion in the detection of significant coronary artery disease: cutoff values and diagnostic accuracy of quantitative [(15)O]H2O PET imaging.
Danad I; Uusitalo V; Kero T; Saraste A; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Heymans MW; Kajander SA; Pietilä M; James S; Sörensen J; Knaapen P; Knuuti J
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Oct; 64(14):1464-75. PubMed ID: 25277618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Qualitative assessments of myocardial ischemia by cardiac MRI and coronary stenosis by invasive coronary angiography in relation to quantitative perfusion by positron emission tomography in patients with known or suspected stable coronary artery disease.
Akil S; Hedeer F; Carlsson M; Arheden H; Oddstig J; Hindorf C; Jögi J; Erlinge D; Engblom H
J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 27(6):2351-2359. PubMed ID: 30535919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb positron emission tomography: clinical validation with 15O-water.
Prior JO; Allenbach G; Valenta I; Kosinski M; Burger C; Verdun FR; Bischof Delaloye A; Kaufmann PA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2012 Jun; 39(6):1037-47. PubMed ID: 22398957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantification of myocardial blood flow by CZT-SPECT with motion correction and comparison with
Otaki Y; Manabe O; Miller RJH; Manrique A; Nganoa C; Roth N; Berman DS; Germano G; Slomka PJ; Agostini D
J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 Aug; 28(4):1477-1486. PubMed ID: 31452085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Absolute quantitation of myocardial blood flow in human subjects with or without myocardial ischemia using dynamic flurpiridaz F 18 PET.
Packard RR; Huang SC; Dahlbom M; Czernin J; Maddahi J
J Nucl Med; 2014 Sep; 55(9):1438-44. PubMed ID: 25071096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Splenic switch-off as a predictor for coronary adenosine response: validation against 13N-ammonia during co-injection myocardial perfusion imaging on a hybrid PET/CMR scanner.
Patriki D; von Felten E; Bakula A; Giannopoulos AA; Kamani CH; Schwyzer M; Messerli M; Benz DC; Gebhard C; Gräni C; Pazhenkottil AP; Kaufmann PA; Fuchs TA; Buechel RR
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2021 Jan; 23(1):3. PubMed ID: 33407586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. First validation of myocardial flow reserve assessed by dynamic
Agostini D; Roule V; Nganoa C; Roth N; Baavour R; Parienti JJ; Beygui F; Manrique A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Jul; 45(7):1079-1090. PubMed ID: 29497801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between N
Giubbini R; Bertoli M; Durmo R; Bonacina M; Peli A; Faggiano I; Albano D; Milan E; Stern E; Paghera B; Rodella C; Cerudelli E; Gazzilli M; Dondi F; Bertagna F; Camoni L
J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 Oct; 28(5):1906-1918. PubMed ID: 31728817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of quantitative CMR perfusion imaging by comparison with simultaneous
Kero T; Johansson E; Engström M; Eggers KM; Johansson L; Ahlström H; Lubberink M
J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 Aug; 28(4):1252-1266. PubMed ID: 31313066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy and Reproducibility of Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification by Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Imaging in Patients With Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.
de Souza ACDAH; Harms HJ; Martell L; Bibbo C; Harrington M; Sullivan K; Hainer J; Dorbala S; Blankstein R; Taqueti VR; Foley Kijewski M; Park MA; Meretta A; Breault C; Roth N; Poitrasson-Rivière A; Soman P; Gullberg GT; Di Carli MF
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2022 Jun; 15(6):e013987. PubMed ID: 35674051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. First Validation of Myocardial Flow Reserve Derived from Dynamic
Yamamoto A; Nagao M; Ando K; Nakao R; Matsuo Y; Sakai A; Momose M; Kaneko K; Hagiwara N; Sakai S
Int Heart J; 2022; 63(2):202-209. PubMed ID: 35354742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of two software systems for quantification of myocardial blood flow in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Yalcin H; Valenta I; Zhao M; Tahari A; Lu DY; Higuchi T; Yalcin F; Kucukler N; Soleimanifard Y; Zhou Y; Pomper MG; Abraham TP; Tsui B; Lodge MA; Schindler TH; Roselle Abraham M
J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1243-1253. PubMed ID: 29359273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fully automated, inline quantification of myocardial blood flow with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: repeatability of measurements in healthy subjects.
Brown LAE; Onciul SC; Broadbent DA; Johnson K; Fent GJ; Foley JRJ; Garg P; Chew PG; Knott K; Dall'Armellina E; Swoboda PP; Xue H; Greenwood JP; Moon JC; Kellman P; Plein S
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Jul; 20(1):48. PubMed ID: 29983119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
