These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31823513)

  • 1. Examining overlap of included studies in meta-reviews: Guidance for using the corrected covered area index.
    Hennessy EA; Johnson BT
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Jan; 11(1):134-145. PubMed ID: 31823513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Managing overlap of primary study results across systematic reviews: practical considerations for authors of overviews of reviews.
    Lunny C; Pieper D; Thabet P; Kanji S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Jul; 21(1):140. PubMed ID: 34233615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and application of an outcome-centric approach for conducting overviews of reviews.
    Kho ME; Poitras VJ; Janssen I; Chaput JP; Saunders TJ; Giangregorio LM; Tomasone JR; Ross-White A; Ross R
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2020 Oct; 45(10 (Suppl. 2)):S151-S164. PubMed ID: 33054336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ccaR: A package for assessing primary study overlap across systematic reviews in overviews.
    Bougioukas KI; Diakonidis T; Mavromanoli AC; Haidich AB
    Res Synth Methods; 2023 May; 14(3):443-454. PubMed ID: 36369993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Graphical Representation of Overlap for OVErviews: GROOVE tool.
    Pérez-Bracchiglione J; Meza N; Bangdiwala SI; Niño de Guzmán E; Urrútia G; Bonfill X; Madrid E
    Res Synth Methods; 2022 May; 13(3):381-388. PubMed ID: 35278030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview.
    Pieper D; Antoine SL; Mathes T; Neugebauer EA; Eikermann M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Apr; 67(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 24581293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 2-risk of bias assessment; synthesis, presentation and summary of the findings; and assessment of the certainty of the evidence.
    Lunny C; Brennan SE; McDonald S; McKenzie JE
    Syst Rev; 2018 Oct; 7(1):159. PubMed ID: 30314530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Overviews of reviews incompletely report methods for handling overlapping, discordant, and problematic data.
    Lunny C; Brennan SE; Reid J; McDonald S; McKenzie JE
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Feb; 118():69-85. PubMed ID: 31606430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.
    Aromataris E; Fernandez R; Godfrey CM; Holly C; Khalil H; Tungpunkom P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):132-40. PubMed ID: 26360830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Publication bias in animal research: a systematic review protocol.
    Briel M; Müller KF; Meerpohl JJ; von Elm E; Lang B; Motschall E; Gloy V; Lamontagne F; Schwarzer G; Bassler D;
    Syst Rev; 2013 Apr; 2():23. PubMed ID: 23621910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Best Practice Guidelines and Essential Methodological Steps to Conduct Rigorous and Systematic Meta-Reviews.
    Hennessy EA; Johnson BT; Keenan C
    Appl Psychol Health Well Being; 2019 Nov; 11(3):353-381. PubMed ID: 31290288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: studies of studies.
    Engberg S
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2008; 35(3):258-65. PubMed ID: 18496080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
    Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Harms in Systematic Reviews Paper 3: Given the same data sources, systematic reviews of gabapentin have different results for harms.
    Qureshi R; Mayo-Wilson E; Rittiphairoj T; McAdams-DeMarco M; Guallar E; Li T
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Mar; 143():224-241. PubMed ID: 34742790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Management of haemorrhoids: protocol of an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Chen M; Tang TC; He TH; Du YJ; Qin D; Zheng H
    BMJ Open; 2020 Mar; 10(3):e035287. PubMed ID: 32213524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nonpharmacological Complementary Interventions for the Management of Pain after Third Molar Surgery: An Umbrella Review of Current Meta-Analyses.
    Firoozi P; Moreira Falci SG; Kim SG; Assael LA
    Pain Res Manag; 2022; 2022():1816748. PubMed ID: 36339067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How are systematic reviews of prevalence conducted? A methodological study.
    Borges Migliavaca C; Stein C; Colpani V; Barker TH; Munn Z; Falavigna M;
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Apr; 20(1):96. PubMed ID: 32336279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.