363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31823792)
1. Psychometric characterization of incidental feedback sources during grasping with a hand prosthesis.
Wilke MA; Niethammer C; Meyer B; Farina D; Dosen S
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Dec; 16(1):155. PubMed ID: 31823792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Myocontrol is closed-loop control: incidental feedback is sufficient for scaling the prosthesis force in routine grasping.
Markovic M; Schweisfurth MA; Engels LF; Farina D; Dosen S
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Sep; 15(1):81. PubMed ID: 30176929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vibrotactile grasping force and hand aperture feedback for myoelectric forearm prosthesis users.
Witteveen HJ; Rietman HS; Veltink PH
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Jun; 39(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 24567348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of vibrotactile and joint-torque feedback in a myoelectric upper-limb prosthesis.
Thomas N; Ung G; McGarvey C; Brown JD
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Jun; 16(1):70. PubMed ID: 31186005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tactile feedback is an effective instrument for the training of grasping with a prosthesis at low- and medium-force levels.
De Nunzio AM; Dosen S; Lemling S; Markovic M; Schweisfurth MA; Ge N; Graimann B; Falla D; Farina D
Exp Brain Res; 2017 Aug; 235(8):2547-2559. PubMed ID: 28550423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Closed-loop control of grasping with a myoelectric hand prosthesis: which are the relevant feedback variables for force control?
Ninu A; Dosen S; Muceli S; Rattay F; Dietl H; Farina D
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 Sep; 22(5):1041-52. PubMed ID: 24801625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adding vibrotactile feedback to a myoelectric-controlled hand improves performance when online visual feedback is disturbed.
Raveh E; Portnoy S; Friedman J
Hum Mov Sci; 2018 Apr; 58():32-40. PubMed ID: 29353091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sensory substitution of elbow proprioception to improve myoelectric control of upper limb prosthesis: experiment on healthy subjects and amputees.
Guémann M; Halgand C; Bastier A; Lansade C; Borrini L; Lapeyre É; Cattaert D; de Rugy A
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Jun; 19(1):59. PubMed ID: 35690860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of vibrotactile feedback and grasp interface compliance on perception and control of a sensorized myoelectric hand.
Pena AE; Rincon-Gonzalez L; Abbas JJ; Jung R
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210956. PubMed ID: 30650161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. EMG Biofeedback for online predictive control of grasping force in a myoelectric prosthesis.
Dosen S; Markovic M; Somer K; Graimann B; Farina D
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Jun; 12():55. PubMed ID: 26088323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Interaction Between Feedback Type and Learning in Routine Grasping With Myoelectric Prostheses.
Wilke MA; Hartmann C; Schimpf F; Farina D; Dosen S
IEEE Trans Haptics; 2020; 13(3):645-654. PubMed ID: 31870991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The clinical relevance of advanced artificial feedback in the control of a multi-functional myoelectric prosthesis.
Markovic M; Schweisfurth MA; Engels LF; Bentz T; Wüstefeld D; Farina D; Dosen S
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Mar; 15(1):28. PubMed ID: 29580245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrotactile EMG feedback improves the control of prosthesis grasping force.
Schweisfurth MA; Markovic M; Dosen S; Teich F; Graimann B; Farina D
J Neural Eng; 2016 Oct; 13(5):056010. PubMed ID: 27547992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Novel Sensory Feedback Approach to Facilitate Both Predictive and Corrective Control of Grasping Force in Myoelectric Prostheses.
Gasparic F; Jorgovanovic N; Hofer C; Russold MF; Koppe M; Stanisic D; Dosen S
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2023; 31():4492-4503. PubMed ID: 37930904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multichannel Electrotactile Feedback With Spatial and Mixed Coding for Closed-Loop Control of Grasping Force in Hand Prostheses.
Dosen S; Markovic M; Strbac M; Belic M; Kojic V; Bijelic G; Keller T; Farina D
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 Mar; 25(3):183-195. PubMed ID: 27071179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of calibration parameters on the control of a myoelectric hand prosthesis using EMG feedback.
Tchimino J; Markovic M; Dideriksen JL; Dosen S
J Neural Eng; 2021 Jun; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 34082406
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Electrotactile Feedback with Spatial and Mixed Coding for Object Identification and Closed-loop Control of Grasping Force in Myoelectric Prostheses.
Chai G; Briand J; Su S; Sheng X; Zhu X
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():1805-1808. PubMed ID: 31946247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Closed-Loop Control of a Multifunctional Myoelectric Prosthesis With Full-State Anatomically Congruent Electrotactile Feedback.
Garenfeld MA; Strbac M; Jorgovanovic N; Dideriksen JL; Dosen S
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2023; 31():2090-2100. PubMed ID: 37058389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the effects of adding vibrotactile feedback to myoelectric prosthesis users on performance and visual attention in a dual-task paradigm.
Raveh E; Friedman J; Portnoy S
Clin Rehabil; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1308-1316. PubMed ID: 29756458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Alpha-band activity in parietofrontal cortex predicts future availability of vibrotactile feedback in prosthesis use.
Johnson JT; de Mari D; Doherty H; Hammond FL; Wheaton LA
Exp Brain Res; 2022 May; 240(5):1387-1398. PubMed ID: 35257195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
