These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31825512)

  • 1. Linking Branch Lengths across Sets of Loci Provides the Highest Statistical Support for Phylogenetic Inference.
    Duchêne DA; Tong KJ; Foster CSP; Duchêne S; Lanfear R; Ho SYW
    Mol Biol Evol; 2020 Apr; 37(4):1202-1210. PubMed ID: 31825512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The devil in the details: interactions between the branch-length prior and likelihood model affect node support and branch lengths in the phylogeny of the Psoraceae.
    Ekman S; Blaalid R
    Syst Biol; 2011 Jul; 60(4):541-61. PubMed ID: 21436107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The gene tree delusion.
    Springer MS; Gatesy J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Jan; 94(Pt A):1-33. PubMed ID: 26238460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of partitioning on phylogenetic inference.
    Kainer D; Lanfear R
    Mol Biol Evol; 2015 Jun; 32(6):1611-27. PubMed ID: 25660373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MAST: Phylogenetic Inference with Mixtures Across Sites and Trees.
    Wong TKF; Cherryh C; Rodrigo AG; Hahn MW; Minh BQ; Lanfear R
    Syst Biol; 2024 Jul; 73(2):375-391. PubMed ID: 38421146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliable estimation of tree branch lengths using deep neural networks.
    Suvorov A; Schrider DR
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2024 Aug; 20(8):e1012337. PubMed ID: 39102450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring among-site rate variation models in a maximum likelihood framework using empirical data: effects of model assumptions on estimates of topology, branch lengths, and bootstrap support.
    Buckley TR; Simon C; Chambers GK
    Syst Biol; 2001 Feb; 50(1):67-86. PubMed ID: 12116595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A mixed branch length model of heterotachy improves phylogenetic accuracy.
    Kolaczkowski B; Thornton JW
    Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Jun; 25(6):1054-66. PubMed ID: 18319244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evolutionary Rate Variation among Lineages in Gene Trees has a Negative Impact on Species-Tree Inference.
    Vankan M; Ho SYW; Duchêne DA
    Syst Biol; 2022 Feb; 71(2):490-500. PubMed ID: 34255084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. II. Gene frequency data.
    Nei M; Tajima F; Tateno Y
    J Mol Evol; 1983; 19(2):153-70. PubMed ID: 6571220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What is the danger of the anomaly zone for empirical phylogenetics?
    Huang H; Knowles LL
    Syst Biol; 2009 Oct; 58(5):527-36. PubMed ID: 20525606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robustness of compound Dirichlet priors for Bayesian inference of branch lengths.
    Zhang C; Rannala B; Yang Z
    Syst Biol; 2012 Oct; 61(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 22328570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analyzing Phylogenetic Trees with a Tree Lattice Coordinate System and a Graph Polynomial.
    Liu P; Biller P; Gould M; Colijn C
    Syst Biol; 2022 Oct; 71(6):1378-1390. PubMed ID: 35169849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modelling heterotachy in phylogenetic inference by reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo.
    Pagel M; Meade A
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2008 Dec; 363(1512):3955-64. PubMed ID: 18852097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phylogenetic analysis and intraspecific variation: performance of parsimony, likelihood, and distance methods.
    Wiens JJ; Servedio MR
    Syst Biol; 1998 Jun; 47(2):228-53. PubMed ID: 12064228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Relative Importance of Modeling Site Pattern Heterogeneity Versus Partition-Wise Heterotachy in Phylogenomic Inference.
    Wang HC; Susko E; Roger AJ
    Syst Biol; 2019 Nov; 68(6):1003-1019. PubMed ID: 31140564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impacts of Terraces on Phylogenetic Inference.
    Sanderson MJ; McMahon MM; Stamatakis A; Zwickl DJ; Steel M
    Syst Biol; 2015 Sep; 64(5):709-26. PubMed ID: 25999395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computational Performance and Statistical Accuracy of *BEAST and Comparisons with Other Methods.
    Ogilvie HA; Heled J; Xie D; Drummond AJ
    Syst Biol; 2016 May; 65(3):381-96. PubMed ID: 26821913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accounting for Uncertainty in Gene Tree Estimation: Summary-Coalescent Species Tree Inference in a Challenging Radiation of Australian Lizards.
    Blom MPK; Bragg JG; Potter S; Moritz C
    Syst Biol; 2017 May; 66(3):352-366. PubMed ID: 28039387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Model Choice, Missing Data, and Taxon Sampling Impact Phylogenomic Inference of Deep Basidiomycota Relationships.
    Prasanna AN; Gerber D; Kijpornyongpan T; Aime MC; Doyle VP; Nagy LG
    Syst Biol; 2020 Jan; 69(1):17-37. PubMed ID: 31062852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.