These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31825763)

  • 1. Determination of Gleason score discrepancy for risk stratification in magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy.
    Kim SH
    Acta Radiol; 2020 Aug; 61(8):1134-1142. PubMed ID: 31825763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; De Cobelli F; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Cardone G; Deho' F; Losa A; Suardi N; Gaboardi F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 May; 1(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 31100225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of histological findings obtained combining US/mp-MRI fusion-guided biopsies with systematic US biopsies: mp-MRI role in prostate cancer detection and false negative.
    Faiella E; Santucci D; Greco F; Frauenfelder G; Giacobbe V; Muto G; Zobel BB; Grasso RF
    Radiol Med; 2018 Feb; 123(2):143-152. PubMed ID: 29019021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Cancer Detection Rates Between TRUS-Guided Biopsy and MRI-Targeted Biopsy According to PSA Level in Biopsy-Naive Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
    Choi YH; Kang MY; Sung HH; Jeon HG; Chang Jeong B; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Kim CK; Park BK; Lee HM
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Feb; 17(1):e19-e25. PubMed ID: 30415878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
    Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
    BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk Stratification of Equivocal Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate.
    Ullrich T; Quentin M; Arsov C; Schmaltz AK; Tschischka A; Laqua N; Hiester A; Blondin D; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Schimmöller L
    J Urol; 2018 Mar; 199(3):691-698. PubMed ID: 28941924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Central zone lesions on magnetic resonance imaging: Should we be concerned?
    Tan WP; Mazzone A; Shors S; Antoine N; Ekbal S; Khare N; McKiel C; Pessis D; Deane L
    Urol Oncol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):31.e7-31.e12. PubMed ID: 27692837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Index Tumor Detection: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen.
    Radtke JP; Schwab C; Wolf MB; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Kesch C; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Gasch C; Klein T; Bonekamp D; Duensing S; Roth W; Schueler S; Stock C; Schlemmer HP; Roethke M; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
    Eur Urol; 2016 Nov; 70(5):846-853. PubMed ID: 26810346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Category 5 Lesions Found False-Positive at Multiparametric Prostate MRI.
    Sheridan AD; Nath SK; Aneja S; Syed JS; Pahade J; Mathur M; Sprenkle P; Weinreb JC; Spektor M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 May; 210(5):W218-W225. PubMed ID: 29489409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retrospective comparison of direct in-bore magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy and fusion-guided biopsy in patients with MRI lesions which are likely or highly likely to be clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Venderink W; van der Leest M; van Luijtelaar A; van de Ven WJM; Fütterer JJ; Sedelaar JPM; Huisman HJ
    World J Urol; 2017 Dec; 35(12):1849-1855. PubMed ID: 28871396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Associated With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 (Equivocal) Lesions Identified on Multiparametric Prostate MRI.
    Sheridan AD; Nath SK; Syed JS; Aneja S; Sprenkle PC; Weinreb JC; Spektor M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):347-357. PubMed ID: 29112469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Targeted Biopsy in Patients with Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Levels <20 ng/mL: A Single-Center Study in Northeastern China.
    Dai Z; Liu Y; Huangfu Z; Wang L; Liu Z
    Med Sci Monit; 2021 Aug; 27():e930234. PubMed ID: 34365459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimizing the Number of Cores Targeted During Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Target Biopsy.
    Kenigsberg AP; Renson A; Rosenkrantz AB; Huang R; Wysock JS; Taneja SS; Bjurlin MA
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Oct; 1(5):418-425. PubMed ID: 31158081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship Between Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Biopsy Indication, and MRI-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy Outcomes.
    Meng X; Rosenkrantz AB; Mendhiratta N; Fenstermaker M; Huang R; Wysock JS; Bjurlin MA; Marshall S; Deng FM; Zhou M; Melamed J; Huang WC; Lepor H; Taneja SS
    Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):512-7. PubMed ID: 26112001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Real-time MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve and pre-biopsied patients with suspicion for prostate cancer].
    Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Kilic E; Asbach P; Haas M; Günzel K; Neymeyer J; Miller K; Cash H
    Aktuelle Urol; 2015 Jan; 46(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 25519051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging can exclude prostate cancer progression in patients on active surveillance: a retrospective cohort study.
    Ullrich T; Arsov C; Quentin M; Mones F; Westphalen AC; Mally D; Hiester A; Albers P; Antoch G; Schimmöller L
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6042-6051. PubMed ID: 32591887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The detection of significant prostate cancer is correlated with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) in MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy.
    Cash H; Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Holzmann J; Asbach P; Haas M; Hinz S; Neymeyer J; Miller K; Günzel K; Kempkensteffen C
    World J Urol; 2016 Apr; 34(4):525-32. PubMed ID: 26293117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Magnetic resonance imaging-transectal ultrasound image-fusion biopsies accurately characterize the index tumor: correlation with step-sectioned radical prostatectomy specimens in 135 patients.
    Baco E; Ukimura O; Rud E; Vlatkovic L; Svindland A; Aron M; Palmer S; Matsugasumi T; Marien A; Bernhard JC; Rewcastle JC; Eggesbø HB; Gill IS
    Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):787-94. PubMed ID: 25240973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective Evaluation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Prostate Cancer Detection.
    Mertan FV; Greer MD; Shih JH; George AK; Kongnyuy M; Muthigi A; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
    J Urol; 2016 Sep; 196(3):690-6. PubMed ID: 27101772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Diagnostic significance of multiparametric MRI combined with US-fusion guided biopsy of the prostate in patients with increased PSA levels and negative standard biopsy results to detect significant prostate cancer - Correlation with the Gleason score. Korrelation mit dem Gleason Score].
    Hoffmann MA; Wieler HJ; Jakobs FM; Taymoorian K; Gerhards A; Miederer M; Schreckenberger M
    Nuklearmedizin; 2017 Aug; 56(4):147-155. PubMed ID: 28715042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.