These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31825997)

  • 1. Detecting false intentions using unanticipated questions.
    Bogaard G; van der Mark J; Meijer EH
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226257. PubMed ID: 31825997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statements about true and false intentions: using the Cognitive Interview to magnify the differences.
    Sooniste T; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA; Vrij A
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Aug; 56(4):371-8. PubMed ID: 25929812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Been there before? Examining "familiarity" as a moderator for discriminating between true and false intentions.
    Knieps M; Granhag PA; Vrij A
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():677. PubMed ID: 25071648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Eliciting cues to false intent: a new application of strategic interviewing.
    Clemens F; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Dec; 35(6):512-22. PubMed ID: 21170575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unanticipated questions can yield unanticipated outcomes in investigative interviews.
    Parkhouse T; Ormerod TC
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208751. PubMed ID: 30532180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outsmarting the liars: the benefit of asking unanticipated questions.
    Vrij A; Leal S; Granhag PA; Mann S; Fisher RP; Hillman J; Sperry K
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Apr; 33(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 18523881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Markers of good planning behavior as a cue for separating true and false intent.
    Mac Giolla E; Granhag PA; Liu-Jönsson M
    Psych J; 2013 Dec; 2(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 26271363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Back to the future: asking about mental images to discriminate between true and false intentions.
    Knieps M; Granhag PA; Vrij A
    J Psychol; 2013; 147(6):619-40. PubMed ID: 24199515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A reverse order interview does not aid deception detection regarding intentions.
    Fenn E; McGuire M; Langben S; Blandón-Gitlin I
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1298. PubMed ID: 26379610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles.
    Vrij A; Mann S; Kristen S; Fisher RP
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Oct; 31(5):499-518. PubMed ID: 17211691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An empirical test of the behaviour analysis interview.
    Vrij A; Mann S; Fisher RP
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Jun; 30(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 16718581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of question expectedness and experience on lying about intentions.
    Warmelink L; Vrij A; Mann S; Jundi S; Granhag PA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Oct; 141(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 22964059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detecting true and false opinions: The Devil's Advocate approach as a lie detection aid.
    Leal S; Vrij A; Mann S; Fisher RP
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):323-9. PubMed ID: 20398882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Truth-tellers stand the test of time and contradict evidence less than liars, even months after a crime.
    Sukumar D; Wade KA; Hodgson JS
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Apr; 42(2):145-155. PubMed ID: 29672094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A stability bias effect among deceivers.
    Harvey AC; Vrij A; Hope L; Leal S; Mann S
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Dec; 41(6):519-529. PubMed ID: 28726439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of sketching while narrating on information elicitation and deception detection in multiple interviews.
    Deeb H; Vrij A; Leal S; Burkhardt J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Feb; 213():103236. PubMed ID: 33360343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of a model statement on information elicitation and deception detection in multiple interviews.
    Deeb H; Vrij A; Leal S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Jun; 207():103080. PubMed ID: 32413731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strategic use of evidence during police interviews: when training to detect deception works.
    Hartwig M; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA; Kronkvist O
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Oct; 30(5):603-19. PubMed ID: 16977348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Introducing the high-context communication style interview protocol to detect deception in pairs.
    Leal S; Vrij A; Ashkenazi T; Vernham Z; Fisher RP; Palena N
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2024 Sep; 249():104440. PubMed ID: 39167909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strategic Interviewing to Detect Deception: Cues to Deception across Repeated Interviews.
    Masip J; Blandón-Gitlin I; Martínez C; Herrero C; Ibabe I
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1702. PubMed ID: 27847493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.