171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31826244)
1. Is there an optimal conditioning for older patients with AML receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation?
Ciurea SO; Kongtim P; Varma A; Rondon G; Chen J; Srour S; Bashir Q; Alousi A; Mehta R; Oran B; Popat U; Hosing C; Olson A; Daver N; Konopleva M; Champlin RE
Blood; 2020 Feb; 135(6):449-452. PubMed ID: 31826244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Conditioning with Fludarabine/Busulfan and Fludarabine/Melphalan in Allogeneic Transplantation Recipients 50 Years or Older.
Kawamura K; Kako S; Mizuta S; Ishiyama K; Aoki J; Yano S; Fukuda T; Uchida N; Ozawa Y; Eto T; Iwato K; Kanamori H; Kahata K; Kondo T; Sawa M; Ichinohe T; Atsuta Y; Kanda Y
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2017 Dec; 23(12):2079-2087. PubMed ID: 28890406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Outcomes of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma Using Three Different Conditioning Regimens.
Maymani H; Lin P; Saliba RM; Popat U; Bashir Q; Shah N; Patel K; Parmar S; Kebriaei P; Hosing C; Ciurea S; Andersson B; Shpall E; Champlin R; Srour SA; Qazilbash MH
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2019 May; 25(5):1039-1044. PubMed ID: 30639822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Choosing a Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Regimen for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation, Fludarabine/Busulfan versus Fludarabine Melphalan: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Jain T; Alahdab F; Firwana B; Sonbol MB; Almader-Douglas D; Palmer J
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2019 Apr; 25(4):728-733. PubMed ID: 30471339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Myeloablative busulfan/cytoxan conditioning versus reduced-intensity fludarabine/melphalan conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia.
Dhere V; Edelman S; Waller EK; Langston A; Graiser M; Connolly EC; Switchenko JM; Esiashvili N; Khan MK
Leuk Lymphoma; 2018 Apr; 59(4):837-843. PubMed ID: 28782395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retrospective comparison of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation following reduced-intensity conditioning with fludarabine/low-dose melphalan plus 4 Gy TBI versus fludarabine/ busulfan plus 4 Gy TBI.
Yamada Y; Ikegawa S; Najima Y; Atsuta Y; Konuma R; Adachi H; Wada A; Kishida Y; Konishi T; Nagata A; Kaito S; Nagata R; Noguchi Y; Marumo A; Mukae J; Inamoto K; Toya T; Igarashi A; Kobayashi T; Sakamaki H; Ohashi K; Doki N
Int J Hematol; 2022 Feb; 115(2):244-254. PubMed ID: 34652634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Busulfan dose intensity and outcomes in reduced-intensity allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia.
Chen YB; Coughlin E; Kennedy KF; Alyea EP; Armand P; Attar EC; Ballen KK; Cutler C; Dey BR; Koreth J; McAfee SL; Spitzer TR; Antin JH; Soiffer RJ; Ho VT
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2013 Jun; 19(6):981-7. PubMed ID: 23562738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treosulfan or busulfan plus fludarabine as conditioning treatment before allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation for older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndrome (MC-FludT.14/L): a randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial.
Beelen DW; Trenschel R; Stelljes M; Groth C; Masszi T; Reményi P; Wagner-Drouet EM; Hauptrock B; Dreger P; Luft T; Bethge W; Vogel W; Ciceri F; Peccatori J; Stölzel F; Schetelig J; Junghanß C; Grosse-Thie C; Michallet M; Labussiere-Wallet H; Schaefer-Eckart K; Dressler S; Grigoleit GU; Mielke S; Scheid C; Holtick U; Patriarca F; Medeot M; Rambaldi A; Micò MC; Niederwieser D; Franke GN; Hilgendorf I; Winkelmann NR; Russo D; Socié G; Peffault de Latour R; Holler E; Wolff D; Glass B; Casper J; Wulf G; Menzel H; Basara N; Bieniaszewska M; Stuhler G; Verbeek M; Grass S; Iori AP; Finke J; Benedetti F; Pichlmeier U; Hemmelmann C; Tribanek M; Klein A; Mylius HA; Baumgart J; Dzierzak-Mietla M; Markiewicz M
Lancet Haematol; 2020 Jan; 7(1):e28-e39. PubMed ID: 31606445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fludarabine-treosulfan versus fludarabine-melphalan or busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning in older AML or MDS patients - A clinical trial to registry data comparison.
Beelen DW; Iacobelli S; Koster L; Eikema DJ; van Biezen A; Stölzel F; Ciceri F; Bethge W; Dreger P; Wagner-Drouet EM; Reményi P; Stelljes M; Markiewicz M; McLornan DP; Yakoub-Agha I; Mohty M
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2024 May; 59(5):670-679. PubMed ID: 38383713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized phase II trial of fludarabine/melphalan 100 versus fludarabine/melphalan 140 followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with multiple myeloma.
Bashir Q; Khan H; Thall PF; Liu P; Shah N; Kebriaei P; Parmar S; Oran B; Ciurea S; Nieto Y; Jones R; Hosing CM; Popat UR; Dinh YT; Rondon G; Orlowski RZ; Shah JJ; De Lima M; Shpall E; Champlin R; Giralt S; Qazilbash MH
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2013 Oct; 19(10):1453-8. PubMed ID: 23872222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fludarabine/Busulfan versus Fludarabine/Melphalan Conditioning in Patients Undergoing Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Lymphoma.
Kekre N; Marquez-Malaver FJ; Cabrero M; Piñana J; Esquirol A; Soiffer RJ; Caballero D; Terol MJ; Martino R; Antin JH; Lopez-Corral L; Solano C; Armand P; Pérez-Simon JA
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2016 Oct; 22(10):1808-1815. PubMed ID: 27470290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reduced intensity vs. myeloablative conditioning with fludarabine and PK-guided busulfan in allogeneic stem cell transplantation for patients with AML/MDS.
Alatrash G; Kidwell KM; Thall PF; Di Stasi A; Chen J; Zope M; Crain AK; Champlin RE; Popat U; Shpall EJ; Jones RB; Andersson BS
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2019 Aug; 54(8):1245-1253. PubMed ID: 30532055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term outcome after a treosulfan-based conditioning regimen for patients with acute myeloid leukemia: A report from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.
Nagler A; Labopin M; Beelen D; Ciceri F; Volin L; Shimoni A; Foá R; Milpied N; Peccatori J; Polge E; Mailhol A; Mohty M; Savani BN
Cancer; 2017 Jul; 123(14):2671-2679. PubMed ID: 28329410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness of fludarabine- and busulfan-based conditioning regimens in patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia: 8-year experience in a single center.
Kasar M; Asma S; Kozanoglu I; Maytalman E; Boga C; Ozdogu H; Yeral M
Transplant Proc; 2015 May; 47(4):1217-21. PubMed ID: 26036558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fludarabine-treosulfan compared to thiotepa-busulfan-fludarabine or FLAMSA as conditioning regimen for patients with primary refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: a study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT).
Saraceni F; Labopin M; Brecht A; Kröger N; Eder M; Tischer J; Labussière-Wallet H; Einsele H; Beelen D; Bunjes D; Niederwieser D; Bochtler T; Savani BN; Mohty M; Nagler A
J Hematol Oncol; 2019 Apr; 12(1):44. PubMed ID: 31023346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Survival Advantage and Comparable Toxicity in Reduced-Toxicity Treosulfan-Based versus Reduced-Intensity Busulfan-Based Conditioning Regimen in Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.
Sakellari I; Mallouri D; Gavriilaki E; Batsis I; Kaliou M; Constantinou V; Papalexandri A; Lalayanni C; Vadikolia C; Athanasiadou A; Yannaki E; Sotiropoulos D; Smias C; Anagnostopoulos A
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2017 Mar; 23(3):445-451. PubMed ID: 27914967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation after Conditioning Regimens with Fludarabine/melphalan or Fludarabine/busulfan for Patients with Hematological Malignancies: A Single-center Analysis.
Yamamoto W; Andou T; Itabashi M; Koyama S; Ishii Y; Numata A; Motohashi K; Hagihara M; Matsumoto K; Fujisawa S
Intern Med; 2016; 55(13):1721-7. PubMed ID: 27374671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reduced-intensity conditioning with fludarabine and busulfan versus fludarabine and melphalan for patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.
Baron F; Labopin M; Peniket A; Jindra P; Afanasyev B; Sanz MA; Deconinck E; Nagler A; Mohty M
Cancer; 2015 Apr; 121(7):1048-55. PubMed ID: 25424330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of fludarabine/melphalan (FluMel) with fludarabine/melphalan/BCNU or thiotepa (FBM/FTM) in patients with AML in first complete remission undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation - a registry study on behalf of the EBMT Acute Leukemia Working Party.
Duque-Afonso J; Finke J; Ngoya M; Galimard JE; Craddock C; Raj K; Bloor A; Nicholson E; Eder M; Kim O; Valerius T; Snowden JA; Tholouli E; Crawley C; Collin M; Wilson KMO; Gadisseur A; Protheroe R; Wagner-Drouet EM; Savani BN; Spyridonidis A; Ciceri F; Nagler A; Mohty M
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2024 Feb; 59(2):247-254. PubMed ID: 38040842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between two fludarabine-based reduced-intensity conditioning regimens before allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation: fludarabine/melphalan is associated with higher incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease and non-relapse mortality and lower incidence of relapse than fludarabine/busulfan.
Shimoni A; Hardan I; Shem-Tov N; Rand A; Herscovici C; Yerushalmi R; Nagler A
Leukemia; 2007 Oct; 21(10):2109-16. PubMed ID: 17690701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
