These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31826687)

  • 1. Computational prediction of implantation outcome after embryo transfer.
    Raef B; Maleki M; Ferdousi R
    Health Informatics J; 2020 Sep; 26(3):1810-1826. PubMed ID: 31826687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of a generally applicable morphokinetic algorithm capable of predicting the implantation potential of embryos transferred on Day 3.
    Petersen BM; Boel M; Montag M; Gardner DK
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2231-44. PubMed ID: 27609980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictive Modeling of Implantation Outcome in an In Vitro Fertilization Setting: An Application of Machine Learning Methods.
    Uyar A; Bener A; Ciray HN
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Aug; 35(6):714-25. PubMed ID: 24842951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multifactor Prediction of Embryo Transfer Outcomes Based on a Machine Learning Algorithm.
    Liu R; Bai S; Jiang X; Luo L; Tong X; Zheng S; Wang Y; Xu B
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2021; 12():745039. PubMed ID: 34795639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Machine learning algorithms to predict early pregnancy loss after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer with fetal heart rate as a strong predictor.
    Liu L; Jiao Y; Li X; Ouyang Y; Shi D
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Nov; 196():105624. PubMed ID: 32623348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Objective way to support embryo transfer: a probabilistic decision.
    Gianaroli L; Magli MC; Gambardella L; Giusti A; Grugnetti C; Corani G
    Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1210-20. PubMed ID: 23462389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Morphokinetic analysis and embryonic prediction for blastocyst formation through an integrated time-lapse system.
    Motato Y; de los Santos MJ; Escriba MJ; Ruiz BA; Remohí J; Meseguer M
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):376-84.e9. PubMed ID: 26598211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of implantation after blastocyst transfer in in vitro fertilization: a machine-learning perspective.
    Blank C; Wildeboer RR; DeCroo I; Tilleman K; Weyers B; de Sutter P; Mischi M; Schoot BC
    Fertil Steril; 2019 Feb; 111(2):318-326. PubMed ID: 30611557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. No advantage of fresh blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer in women under the age of 39: a randomized controlled study.
    Levi-Setti PE; Cirillo F; Smeraldi A; Morenghi E; Mulazzani GEG; Albani E
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 Mar; 35(3):457-465. PubMed ID: 29168022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of machine learning classification techniques to predict implantation success in an IVF treatment cycle.
    Yiğit P; Bener A; Karabulut S
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2022 Nov; 45(5):923-934. PubMed ID: 36088224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer following in vitro fertilization No. 182, September 2006.
    JOINT SOGC-CFAS
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 Aug; 102(2):203-16. PubMed ID: 18773532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Embryo stage of development is not decisive for reproductive outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles.
    Carvalho BR; Barbosa MW; Bonesi H; Gomes DB; Cabral ÍO; Barbosa AC; Silva AA; Iglesias JR; Nakagawa HM
    JBRA Assist Reprod; 2017 Feb; 21(1):23-26. PubMed ID: 28333028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automatic time-lapse instrument is superior to single-point morphology observation for selecting viable embryos: retrospective study in oocyte donation.
    Aparicio-Ruiz B; Basile N; Pérez Albalá S; Bronet F; Remohí J; Meseguer M
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Nov; 106(6):1379-1385.e10. PubMed ID: 27530063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combining Machine Learning with Metabolomic and Embryologic Data Improves Embryo Implantation Prediction.
    Cheredath A; Uppangala S; C S A; Jijo A; R VL; Kumar P; Joseph D; G A NG; Kalthur G; Adiga SK
    Reprod Sci; 2023 Mar; 30(3):984-994. PubMed ID: 36097248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using Unlabeled Information of Embryo Siblings from the Same Cohort Cycle to Enhance In Vitro Fertilization Implantation Prediction.
    Tzukerman N; Rotem O; Shapiro MT; Maor R; Meseguer M; Gilboa D; Seidman DS; Zaritsky A
    Adv Sci (Weinh); 2023 Sep; 10(27):e2207711. PubMed ID: 37507828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term evaluation of implantation of fresh and cryopreserved human embryos following ovarian stimulation with buserelin acetate-human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) or clomiphene citrate-HMG.
    Van der Elst J; Van den Abbeel E; Camus M; Smitz J; Devroey P; Van Steirteghem A
    Hum Reprod; 1996 Oct; 11(10):2097-106. PubMed ID: 8943509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The interval transfer of a frozen-thawed embryo is more successful than a fresh embryo transfer for women undergoing IVF with recurrent implantation failure after cleavage stage embryo biopsy.
    Pontré JC; Ryan JP; Tan A; Hart RJ
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Feb; 59(1):134-139. PubMed ID: 29551013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts.
    Capalbo A; Rienzi L; Cimadomo D; Maggiulli R; Elliott T; Wright G; Nagy ZP; Ubaldi FM
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1173-81. PubMed ID: 24578475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The factors affecting the outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle.
    Ashrafi M; Jahangiri N; Hassani F; Akhoond MR; Madani T
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jun; 50(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 21791301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cross-validation and predictive value of near-infrared spectroscopy algorithms for day-5 blastocyst transfer.
    Ahlström A; Wikland M; Rogberg L; Barnett JS; Tucker M; Hardarson T
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 May; 22(5):477-84. PubMed ID: 21397559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.