These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31826715)

  • 21. Stages of lexical access in language production.
    Dell GS; O'Seaghdha PG
    Cognition; 1992 Mar; 42(1-3):287-314. PubMed ID: 1582160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Settling Into Semantic Space: An Ambiguity-Focused Account of Word-Meaning Access.
    Rodd JM
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2020 Mar; 15(2):411-427. PubMed ID: 31961780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Adding new information to semantic memory: how much learning is enough to produce automatic priming?
    Dagenbach D; Horst S; Carr TH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Jul; 16(4):581-91. PubMed ID: 2142954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Spanish norms for age of acquisition, concept familiarity, lexical frequency, manipulability, typicality, and other variables for 820 words from 14 living/nonliving concepts.
    Moreno-Martínez FJ; Montoro PR; Rodríguez-Rojo IC
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Dec; 46(4):1088-97. PubMed ID: 24415408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The influence of place and time on lexical behavior: A distributional analysis.
    Johns BT; Jamieson RK
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Dec; 51(6):2438-2453. PubMed ID: 31452008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. On the advantages of word frequency and contextual diversity measures extracted from subtitles: The case of Portuguese.
    Soares AP; Machado J; Costa A; Iriarte Á; Simões A; de Almeida JJ; Comesaña M; Perea M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(4):680-96. PubMed ID: 25263599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Large-Scale Analysis of Variance in Written Language.
    Johns BT; Jamieson RK
    Cogn Sci; 2018 May; 42(4):1360-1374. PubMed ID: 29356046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. How useful are corpus-based methods for extrapolating psycholinguistic variables?
    Mandera P; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(8):1623-42. PubMed ID: 25695623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Semantic diversity accounts for the "missing" word frequency effect in stroke aphasia: insights using a novel method to quantify contextual variability in meaning.
    Hoffman P; Rogers TT; Ralph MA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 23(9):2432-46. PubMed ID: 21254804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Individual variability in the semantic processing of English compound words.
    Schmidtke D; Van Dyke JA; Kuperman V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Mar; 44(3):421-439. PubMed ID: 28933895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The role of semantic diversity in lexical organization.
    Jones MN; Johns BT; Recchia G
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Jun; 66(2):115-24. PubMed ID: 22686160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Division of Labor in Vocabulary Structure: Insights From Corpus Analyses.
    Christiansen MH; Monaghan P
    Top Cogn Sci; 2016 Jul; 8(3):610-24. PubMed ID: 26399384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition.
    Schmidtke D; Matsuki K; Kuperman V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1793-1820. PubMed ID: 28447810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The British Lexicon Project: lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words.
    Keuleers E; Lacey P; Rastle K; Brysbaert M
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Mar; 44(1):287-304. PubMed ID: 21720920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accounting for item-level variance in recognition memory: Comparing word frequency and contextual diversity.
    Johns BT
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Jul; 50(5):1013-1032. PubMed ID: 34811640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evidence for semantic involvement in regular and exception word reading in emergent readers of English.
    Ricketts J; Davies R; Masterson J; Stuart M; Duff FJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Oct; 150():330-345. PubMed ID: 27416563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The way in which foreign words are learned determines their use in isolation and within sentences.
    García-Gámez AB; Macizo P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Feb; 46(2):364-379. PubMed ID: 31120267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Do the effects of subjective frequency and age of acquisition survive better word frequency norms?
    Brysbaert M; Cortese MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):545-59. PubMed ID: 20700859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Word semantics is processed even without attentional effort.
    Relander K; Rämä P; Kujala T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1511-22. PubMed ID: 18823236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. From sound to meaning: Phonology-to-Semantics mapping in visual word recognition.
    Amenta S; Marelli M; Sulpizio S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):887-893. PubMed ID: 27572870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.