These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31828844)

  • 1. Industrial exoskeletons: Need for intervention effectiveness research.
    Howard J; Murashov VV; Lowe BD; Lu ML
    Am J Ind Med; 2020 Mar; 63(3):201-208. PubMed ID: 31828844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Manufacturing Industry Stakeholder Perspectives on Occupational Exoskeletons: Changes after a Brief Exposure to Exoskeletons.
    Raghuraman RN; Upasani S; Gonzales A; Aviles J; Cha J; Srinivasan D
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2023; 11(3-4):71-80. PubMed ID: 37747446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Model-Based Comparison of Passive and Active Assistance Designs in an Occupational Upper Limb Exoskeleton for Overhead Lifting.
    Zhou X; Zheng L
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2021; 9(3-4):167-185. PubMed ID: 34254566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Supporting Surgical Teams: Identifying Needs and Barriers for Exoskeleton Implementation in the Operating Room.
    Cha JS; Monfared S; Stefanidis D; Nussbaum MA; Yu D
    Hum Factors; 2020 May; 62(3):377-390. PubMed ID: 31593495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of exoskeletons in the occupational context for primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of work-related musculoskeletal complaints.
    Steinhilber B; Luger T; Schwenkreis P; Middeldorf S; Bork H; Mann B; von Glinski A; Schildhauer TA; Weiler S; Schmauder M; Heinrich K; Winter G; Schnalke G; Frener P; Schick R; Wischniewski S; Jäger M
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2020; 8(3):132-144. PubMed ID: 33140996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A framework for evaluation and adoption of industrial exoskeletons.
    Golabchi A; Riahi N; Fix M; Miller L; Rouhani H; Tavakoli M
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Nov; 113():104103. PubMed ID: 37499526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An industrial exoskeleton user acceptance framework based on a literature review of empirical studies.
    Elprama SA; Vanderborght B; Jacobs A
    Appl Ergon; 2022 Apr; 100():103615. PubMed ID: 34847372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures.
    Golabchi A; Chao A; Tavakoli M
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Apr; 22(7):. PubMed ID: 35408328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Kinematic and kinetic functional requirements for industrial exoskeletons for lifting tasks and overhead lifting.
    Huysamen K; Power V; O'Sullivan L
    Ergonomics; 2020 Jul; 63(7):818-830. PubMed ID: 32320343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modelling for design and evaluation of industrial exoskeletons: A systematic review.
    Ma T; Zhang Y; Choi SD; Xiong S
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Nov; 113():104100. PubMed ID: 37490791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of exoskeleton design and precision requirements on physical demands and quality in a simulated overhead drilling task.
    Alabdulkarim S; Kim S; Nussbaum MA
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Oct; 80():136-145. PubMed ID: 31280797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exoskeleton Application to Military Manual Handling Tasks.
    Proud JK; Lai DTH; Mudie KL; Carstairs GL; Billing DC; Garofolini A; Begg RK
    Hum Factors; 2022 May; 64(3):527-554. PubMed ID: 33203237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of Soft versus Rigid Back-Support Exoskeletons during a Lifting Task.
    Schwartz M; Theurel J; Desbrosses K
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(15):. PubMed ID: 34360352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation Methods and Measurement Challenges for Industrial Exoskeletons.
    Li-Baboud YS; Virts A; Bostelman R; Yoon S; Rahman A; Rhode L; Ahmed N; Shah M
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jun; 23(12):. PubMed ID: 37420770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load.
    de Looze MP; Bosch T; Krause F; Stadler KS; O'Sullivan LW
    Ergonomics; 2016 May; 59(5):671-81. PubMed ID: 26444053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Towards a Functional Performance Validation Standard for Industrial Low-Back Exoskeletons: State of the Art Review.
    Pesenti M; Antonietti A; Gandolla M; Pedrocchi A
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jan; 21(3):. PubMed ID: 33530377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Social Processes: What Determines Industrial Workers' Intention to Use Exoskeletons?
    Elprama SA; Vannieuwenhuyze JTA; De Bock S; Vanderborght B; De Pauw K; Meeusen R; Jacobs A
    Hum Factors; 2020 May; 62(3):337-350. PubMed ID: 31971838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ASTM F48 Formation and Standards for Industrial Exoskeletons and Exosuits.
    Lowe BD; Billotte WG; Peterson DR
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2019; 7():. PubMed ID: 31276081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In-Field Training of a Passive Back Exoskeleton Changes the Biomechanics of Logistic Workers.
    Schrøder Jakobsen L; Samani A; Desbrosses K; de Zee M; Madeleine P
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2024 Jun; ():1-13. PubMed ID: 38869954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of an active and passive industrial back exoskeleton on functional performance.
    Govaerts R; De Bock S; Provyn S; Vanderborght B; Roelands B; Meeusen R; De Pauw K
    Ergonomics; 2024 May; 67(5):597-618. PubMed ID: 37480301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.