332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31829138)
41. [To the question of elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation, the answer lies in the question].
Rozenberg P
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018 May; 46(5):481-488. PubMed ID: 29656952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Elective Induction of Labor in the 39th Week of Gestation Compared With Expectant Management of Low-Risk Multiparous Women.
Sinkey RG; Blanchard CT; Szychowski JM; Ausbeck E; Subramaniam A; Neely CL; Casey BM; Tita AT
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Aug; 134(2):282-287. PubMed ID: 31306328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Amniotomy versus expectant management during the active phase of labor defined by the new WHO definition on the duration of labor: A randomized controlled trial.
Khunpradit S; Kamkrea S; Srisuwan T; Mooncheep T
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 Apr; 165(1):368-374. PubMed ID: 38299786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A randomized trial of Foley Bulb for Labor Induction in Premature Rupture of Membranes in Nulliparas (FLIP).
Amorosa JMH; Stone J; Factor SH; Booker W; Newland M; Bianco A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 217(3):360.e1-360.e7. PubMed ID: 28479288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Likelihood of primary cesarean section following induction of labor in singleton cephalic pregnancies at term, compared with expectant management: An Australian population-based, historical cohort study.
Hu Y; Homer CSE; Ellwood D; Slavin V; Vogel JP; Enticott J; Callander EJ
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2024 May; 103(5):946-954. PubMed ID: 38291953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Induction of labor at full-term in pregnant women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Saccone G; Della Corte L; Maruotti GM; Quist-Nelson J; Raffone A; De Vivo V; Esposito G; Zullo F; Berghella V
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Aug; 98(8):958-966. PubMed ID: 30723915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Impacts of embracing 39-week elective induction across an entire labor and delivery unit.
Jelks AT; Yao AQ; Byrne JD
AJOG Glob Rep; 2023 May; 3(2):100168. PubMed ID: 36941864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Effect of early amniotomy on dystocia risk and cesarean delivery in nulliparous women: a randomized clinical trial.
Ghafarzadeh M; Moeininasab S; Namdari M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Aug; 292(2):321-5. PubMed ID: 25666481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Health resource utilization of labor induction versus expectant management.
Grobman WA; Sandoval G; Reddy UM; Tita ATN; Silver RM; Mallett G; Hill K; Rice MM; El-Sayed YY; Wapner RJ; Rouse DJ; Saade GR; Thorp JM; Chauhan SP; Iams JD; Chien EK; Casey BM; Gibbs RS; Srinivas SK; Swamy GK; Simhan HN; Macones GA;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):369.e1-369.e11. PubMed ID: 31930993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Induction of labor before 40 weeks is associated with lower rate of cesarean delivery in women with gestational diabetes mellitus.
Melamed N; Ray JG; Geary M; Bedard D; Yang C; Sprague A; Murray-Davis B; Barrett J; Berger H
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):364.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26928149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Success of trial of labor in women with a history of previous cesarean section for failed labor induction or labor dystocia: a retrospective cohort study.
Place K; Kruit H; Tekay A; Heinonen S; Rahkonen L
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 May; 19(1):176. PubMed ID: 31109302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Outcomes of Term Induction in Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery: Analysis of a Modern Obstetric Cohort.
Lappen JR; Hackney DN; Bailit JL
Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 126(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 26241264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Randomized Trial of Labor Induction in Women 35 Years of Age or Older.
Walker KF; Bugg GJ; Macpherson M; McCormick C; Grace N; Wildsmith C; Bradshaw L; Smith GC; Thornton JG;
N Engl J Med; 2016 Mar; 374(9):813-22. PubMed ID: 26962902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial.
Boulvain M; Senat MV; Perrotin F; Winer N; Beucher G; Subtil D; Bretelle F; Azria E; Hejaiej D; Vendittelli F; Capelle M; Langer B; Matis R; Connan L; Gillard P; Kirkpatrick C; Ceysens G; Faron G; Irion O; Rozenberg P;
Lancet; 2015 Jun; 385(9987):2600-5. PubMed ID: 25863654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Induction of labor vs expectant management among low-risk patients with 1 prior cesarean delivery.
Ukoha EP; Wen T; Reddy UM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38852849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Intentional early delivery versus expectant management for preterm premature rupture of membranes at 28-32 weeks' gestation: A multicentre randomized controlled trial (MICADO STUDY).
Pasquier JC; Claris O; Rabilloud M; Ecochard R; Picaud JC; Moret S; Buch D; Mellier G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Feb; 233():30-37. PubMed ID: 30553135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Induction of labour from 39 weeks in low-risk multiparas with ripe cervixes: A randomised controlled trial.
Tan PC; Othman A; Win ST; Hong JGS; Elias N; Omar SZ
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Dec; 61(6):882-890. PubMed ID: 34089525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more).
Dare MR; Middleton P; Crowther CA; Flenady VJ; Varatharaju B
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2006 Jan; (1):CD005302. PubMed ID: 16437525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Active management of labor: a meta-analysis of cesarean delivery rates for dystocia in nulliparas.
Glantz JC; McNanley TJ
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1997 Aug; 52(8):497-505. PubMed ID: 9267867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
