These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31829657)

  • 1. Misinterpreting p: The discrepancy between p values and the probability the null hypothesis is true, the influence of multiple testing, and implications for the replication crisis.
    Anderson SF
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Oct; 25(5):596-609. PubMed ID: 31829657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A review of issues about null hypothesis Bayesian testing.
    Tendeiro JN; Kiers HAL
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Dec; 24(6):774-795. PubMed ID: 31094544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor.
    Hoijtink H; Mulder J; van Lissa C; Gu X
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Oct; 24(5):539-556. PubMed ID: 30742472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficient alternatives for Bayesian hypothesis tests in psychology.
    Pramanik S; Johnson VE
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Apr; 29(2):243-261. PubMed ID: 35420854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. P value and the theory of hypothesis testing: an explanation for new researchers.
    Biau DJ; Jolles BM; Porcher R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 468(3):885-92. PubMed ID: 19921345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Controlling decision errors with minimal costs: The sequential probability ratio t test.
    Schnuerch M; Erdfelder E
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Apr; 25(2):206-226. PubMed ID: 31497982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The continuing misuse of null hypothesis significance testing in biological anthropology.
    Smith RJ
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2018 May; 166(1):236-245. PubMed ID: 29345299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Replacing P-values with frequentist posterior probabilities of replication-When possible parameter values must have uniform marginal prior probabilities.
    Llewelyn H
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212302. PubMed ID: 30811495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals.
    Hoekstra R; Morey RD; Rouder JN; Wagenmakers EJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Oct; 21(5):1157-64. PubMed ID: 24420726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The frequentist implications of optional stopping on Bayesian hypothesis tests.
    Sanborn AN; Hills TT
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Apr; 21(2):283-300. PubMed ID: 24101570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. To P or Not to P: Backing Bayesian Statistics.
    Buchinsky FJ; Chadha NK
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Dec; 157(6):915-918. PubMed ID: 29192853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bayes factor and posterior probability: Complementary statistical evidence to p-value.
    Lin R; Yin G
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Sep; 44():33-35. PubMed ID: 26212520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Harm Done to Reproducibility by the Culture of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing.
    Lash TL
    Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Sep; 186(6):627-635. PubMed ID: 28938715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Bayesian Analysis of Evidence in Support of the Null Hypothesis in Gerontological Psychology (or Lack Thereof).
    Brydges CR; Bielak AAM
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2020 Jan; 75(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 30877301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How often is prep close to the true replication probability?
    Trafimow D; MacDonald JA; Rice S; Clason DL
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Sep; 15(3):300-7. PubMed ID: 20822254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using epistemic ratios to evaluate hypotheses: an imprecision penalty for imprecise hypotheses.
    Trafimow D
    Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 2006 Nov; 132(4):431-62. PubMed ID: 18341235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistics in ophthalmology revisited: the (effect) size matters.
    Grzybowski A; Mianowany M
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 96(7):e885-e888. PubMed ID: 30187631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hail the impossible: p-values, evidence, and likelihood.
    Johansson T
    Scand J Psychol; 2011 Apr; 52(2):113-25. PubMed ID: 21077903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What is the value of a p value?
    Grunkemeier GL; Wu Y; Furnary AP
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 May; 87(5):1337-43. PubMed ID: 19379861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.