These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3182994)

  • 1. Comparison of the Quantum II, API Yeast Ident, and AutoMicrobic systems for identification of clinical yeast isolates.
    Pfaller MA; Preston T; Bale M; Koontz FP; Body BA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Oct; 26(10):2054-8. PubMed ID: 3182994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card and API 20C yeast identification systems.
    Fenn JP; Segal H; Barland B; Denton D; Whisenant J; Chun H; Christofferson K; Hamilton L; Carroll K
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 May; 32(5):1184-7. PubMed ID: 8051243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the ATB 32C, automicrobic system and API 20C using clinical yeast isolates.
    Gutierrez J; Martin E; Lozano C; Coronilla J; Nogales C
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1994; 52(6):443-6. PubMed ID: 7856946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Misidentification of clinical yeast isolates by using the updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card.
    Dooley DP; Beckius ML; Jeffrey BS
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Dec; 32(12):2889-92. PubMed ID: 7883873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Evaluation of common commercial systems for the identification of yeast isolates in microbiology laboratories: a multicenter study].
    Karabıçak N; Uludağ Altun H; Karatuna O; Hazırolan G; Aksu N; Adiloğlu A; Akyar I
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2015 Apr; 49(2):210-20. PubMed ID: 26167821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical comparison of the Baxter MicroScan Yeast Identification Panel and the Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card.
    Riddle DL; Giger O; Miller L; Hall GS; Woods GL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Apr; 101(4):438-42. PubMed ID: 8160633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the Quantum II Bacterial Identification System and the AutoMicrobic System for the identification of gram-negative bacilli.
    Pfaller MA; Bale MJ; Schulte KR; Koontz FP
    J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Jan; 23(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 3517034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparison of methods for the identification of the most common yeasts in the clinical microbiology laboratory].
    Guelfand L; Grisolía P; Bozzano C; Kaufman S
    Rev Argent Microbiol; 2003; 35(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 12833681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Update and evaluation of the AutoMicrobic yeast identification system.
    Land G; Stotler R; Land K; Staneck J
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Oct; 20(4):649-52. PubMed ID: 6386872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of methods for yeast identification including CHROMagar Candida, Vitek system YBC and a traditional biochemical method.
    Huang LU; Chen CH; Chou CF; Lu JJ; Chi WM; Lee WH
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2001 Oct; 64(10):568-74. PubMed ID: 11791943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the Quantum II yeast identification system.
    Kiehn TE; Edwards FF; Tom D; Lieberman G; Bernard EM; Armstrong D
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Aug; 22(2):216-9. PubMed ID: 3897264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of Abbott Quantum II yeast identification system.
    Salkin IF; Schadow KH; Bankaitis LA; McGinnis MR; Kemna ME
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Sep; 22(3):442-4. PubMed ID: 3900130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of three commercial systems for identification of yeasts commonly isolated in the clinical microbiology laboratory.
    Wadlin JK; Hanko G; Stewart R; Pape J; Nachamkin I
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 37(6):1967-70. PubMed ID: 10325356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system Yeast Biochemical Card for rapid identification of medically important yeasts.
    Oblack DL; Rhodes JC; Martin WJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Feb; 13(2):351-5. PubMed ID: 7009641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification of Candida dubliniensis based on temperature and utilization of xylose and alpha-methyl-D-glucoside as determined with the API 20C AUX and vitek YBC systems.
    Gales AC; Pfaller MA; Houston AK; Joly S; Sullivan DJ; Coleman DC; Soll DR
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Dec; 37(12):3804-8. PubMed ID: 10565888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative study of seven commercial yeast identification systems.
    Verweij PE; Breuker IM; Rijs AJ; Meis JF
    J Clin Pathol; 1999 Apr; 52(4):271-3. PubMed ID: 10474518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the AUXACOLOR system, a new method of clinical yeast identification.
    Davey KG; Chant PM; Downer CS; Campbell CK; Warnock DW
    J Clin Pathol; 1995 Sep; 48(9):807-9. PubMed ID: 7490311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical comparison of the AutoMicrobic system gram-positive identification card, API Staph-Ident, and conventional methods in the identification of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp.
    Grasmick AE; Naito N; Bruckner DA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Dec; 18(6):1323-8. PubMed ID: 6361051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Research on rapid identification of auto-microbiology system for pathogenic yeast.
    Liao WQ; Zhao ZQ; Zhao H
    Chin Med J (Engl); 1992 Apr; 105(4):319-21. PubMed ID: 1618016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the autoSCAN-W/A rapid bacterial identification system and the Vitek AutoMicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli.
    Pfaller MA; Sahm D; O'Hara C; Ciaglia C; Yu M; Yamane N; Scharnweber G; Rhoden D
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Jul; 29(7):1422-8. PubMed ID: 1885737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.