BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31830265)

  • 21. Epistasis in the multiple locus symmetric viability model.
    Christiansen FB
    J Math Biol; 1988; 26(6):595-618. PubMed ID: 3230363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effects of epistasis and linkage on the invasion of locally beneficial mutations and the evolution of genomic islands.
    Pontz M; Bürger R
    Theor Popul Biol; 2022 Apr; 144():49-69. PubMed ID: 35124094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Multilocus population genetics with weak epistasis. II. Equilibrium properties of multilocus models: what is the unit of selection?
    Hastings A
    Genetics; 1986 Jan; 112(1):157-71. PubMed ID: 3943708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The advantage of recombination when selection is acting at many genetic Loci.
    Hickey DA; Golding GB
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Apr; 442():123-128. PubMed ID: 29355539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bottlenecks and inbreeding depression in autotetraploids.
    Layman NC; Busch JW
    Evolution; 2018 Oct; 72(10):2025-2037. PubMed ID: 30136722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Self-fertilization and the evolution of recombination.
    Roze D; Lenormand T
    Genetics; 2005 Jun; 170(2):841-57. PubMed ID: 15781706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Epistasis detectably alters correlations between genomic sites in a narrow parameter window.
    Pedruzzi G; Rouzine IM
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0214036. PubMed ID: 31150393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Induced autotetraploid grape mutants].
    Kuliev VM
    Tsitol Genet; 2011; 45(3):35-42. PubMed ID: 21774401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Deleterious mutations, variable epistatic interactions, and the evolution of recombination.
    Otto SP; Feldman MW
    Theor Popul Biol; 1997 Apr; 51(2):134-47. PubMed ID: 9169238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of varying epistasis on the evolution of recombination.
    Kouyos RD; Otto SP; Bonhoeffer S
    Genetics; 2006 Jun; 173(2):589-97. PubMed ID: 16547114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Selection biases the prevalence and type of epistasis along adaptive trajectories.
    Draghi JA; Plotkin JB
    Evolution; 2013 Nov; 67(11):3120-31. PubMed ID: 24151997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Imperfect Linkage Disequilibrium Generates Phantom Epistasis (& Perils of Big Data).
    de Los Campos G; Sorensen DA; Toro MA
    G3 (Bethesda); 2019 May; 9(5):1429-1436. PubMed ID: 30877081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evolutionary dynamics in the two-locus two-allele model with weak selection.
    Pontz M; Hofbauer J; Bürger R
    J Math Biol; 2018 Jan; 76(1-2):151-203. PubMed ID: 28547213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Selection on a modifier of recombination rate due to linked deleterious mutations.
    Pálsson S
    J Hered; 2002; 93(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 12011171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reciprocal sign epistasis and truncation selection: When is recombination favorable in a pre-breeding program with a selfing species?
    Vagne C; David J; Tavaud M; Fontez B
    J Theor Biol; 2015 Dec; 386():44-54. PubMed ID: 26334476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Population structure, fitness surfaces, and linkage in the shifting balance process.
    Bergman A; Goldstein DB; Holsinger KE; Feldman MW
    Genet Res; 1995 Aug; 66(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 8575671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The interplay of additivity, dominance, and epistasis on fitness in a diploid yeast cross.
    Matsui T; Mullis MN; Roy KR; Hale JJ; Schell R; Levy SF; Ehrenreich IM
    Nat Commun; 2022 Mar; 13(1):1463. PubMed ID: 35304450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Molecular signature of epistatic selection: interrogating genetic interactions in the sex-ratio meiotic drive of Drosophila simulans.
    Chevin LM; Bastide H; Montchamp-Moreau C; Hospital F
    Genet Res (Camb); 2009 Jun; 91(3):171-82. PubMed ID: 19589187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Epistatic selection in a multi-locus Levene model and implications for linkage disequilibrium.
    Wiehe T; Slatkin M
    Theor Popul Biol; 1998 Feb; 53(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 9500912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of epistasis and linkage on fixation probability in three-locus models: an ancestral recombination-selection graph approach.
    Kermany AR; Lessard S
    Theor Popul Biol; 2012 Sep; 82(2):131-45. PubMed ID: 22634384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.