These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31830899)

  • 1. Accuracy of genomic BLUP when considering a genomic relationship matrix based on the number of the largest eigenvalues: a simulation study.
    Pocrnic I; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Misztal I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Dec; 51(1):75. PubMed ID: 31830899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dimensionality of genomic information and performance of the Algorithm for Proven and Young for different livestock species.
    Pocrnic I; Lourenco DA; Masuda Y; Misztal I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Oct; 48(1):82. PubMed ID: 27799053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Dimensionality of Genomic Information and Its Effect on Genomic Prediction.
    Pocrnic I; Lourenco DA; Masuda Y; Legarra A; Misztal I
    Genetics; 2016 May; 203(1):573-81. PubMed ID: 26944916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is single-step genomic REML with the algorithm for proven and young more computationally efficient when less generations of data are present?
    Junqueira VS; Lourenco D; Masuda Y; Cardoso FF; Lopes PS; Silva FFE; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2022 May; 100(5):. PubMed ID: 35289906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Crossbred evaluations using single-step genomic BLUP and algorithm for proven and young with different sources of data1.
    Pocrnic I; Lourenco DAL; Chen CY; Herring WO; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Apr; 97(4):1513-1522. PubMed ID: 30726939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comprehensive study on size and definition of the core group in the proven and young algorithm for single-step GBLUP.
    Abdollahi-Arpanahi R; Lourenco D; Misztal I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2022 May; 54(1):34. PubMed ID: 35596130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Core-dependent changes in genomic predictions using the Algorithm for Proven and Young in single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction.
    Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Pocrnic I; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Dec; 98(12):. PubMed ID: 33211798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An efficient exact method to obtain GBLUP and single-step GBLUP when the genomic relationship matrix is singular.
    Fernando RL; Cheng H; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Oct; 48(1):80. PubMed ID: 27788669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Large-scale genomic prediction using singular value decomposition of the genotype matrix.
    Ødegård J; Indahl U; Strandén I; Meuwissen THE
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Feb; 50(1):6. PubMed ID: 29490611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dimensionality of genomic information and its impact on genome-wide associations and variant selection for genomic prediction: a simulation study.
    Jang S; Tsuruta S; Leite NG; Misztal I; Lourenco D
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Jul; 55(1):49. PubMed ID: 37460964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inexpensive Computation of the Inverse of the Genomic Relationship Matrix in Populations with Small Effective Population Size.
    Misztal I
    Genetics; 2016 Feb; 202(2):401-9. PubMed ID: 26584903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The quality of the algorithm for proven and young with various sets of core animals in a multibreed sheep population1.
    Nilforooshan MA; Lee M
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Mar; 97(3):1090-1100. PubMed ID: 30624671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sparse single-step genomic BLUP in crossbreeding schemes.
    Vandenplas J; Calus MPL; Ten Napel J
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Jun; 96(6):2060-2073. PubMed ID: 29873759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Invited review: efficient computation strategies in genomic selection.
    Misztal I; Legarra A
    Animal; 2017 May; 11(5):731-736. PubMed ID: 27869042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incorporation of causative quantitative trait nucleotides in single-step GBLUP.
    Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Legarra A; Misztal I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jul; 49(1):59. PubMed ID: 28747171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Solving efficiently large single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction models.
    Strandén I; Matilainen K; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Jun; 134(3):264-274. PubMed ID: 28508482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implementation of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor for US Holsteins with a large number of genotyped animals.
    Masuda Y; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Legarra A; Aguilar I; Lourenco DAL; Fragomeni BO; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Mar; 99(3):1968-1974. PubMed ID: 26805987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the equivalence between marker effect models and breeding value models and direct genomic values with the Algorithm for Proven and Young.
    Bermann M; Lourenco D; Forneris NS; Legarra A; Misztal I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Jul; 54(1):52. PubMed ID: 35842585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.
    Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strategies for choosing core animals in the algorithm for proven and young and their impact on the accuracy of single-step genomic predictions in cattle.
    Cesarani A; Bermann M; Dimauro C; Degano L; Vicario D; Lourenco D; Macciotta NPP
    Animal; 2023 Apr; 17(4):100766. PubMed ID: 37001441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.