219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31830970)
1. Trueness of CAD/CAM digitization with a desktop scanner - an in vitro study.
Joós-Kovács G; Vecsei B; Körmendi S; Gyarmathy VA; Borbély J; Hermann P
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Dec; 19(1):280. PubMed ID: 31830970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative study assessing the precision and trueness of digital and printed casts produced from several intraoral and extraoral scanners in full arch and short span (3-unit FPD) scanning: An in vitro study.
Ellakany P; Aly NM; Al-Harbi F
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):423-430. PubMed ID: 35852379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of 3D Printed and Digital Casts Produced from Intraoral and Extraoral Scanners with Different Scanning Technologies: In Vitro Study.
Ellakany P; Aly NM; Al-Harbi F
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jul; 31(6):521-528. PubMed ID: 34661950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Positional trueness of abutments by using a digital die-merging protocol compared with complete arch direct digital scans and conventional dental impressions.
Jelicich A; Scialabba R; Lee SJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; 131(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 35430047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining dental impressions.
Carbajal Mejía JB; Wakabayashi K; Nakamura T; Yatani H
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):392-399. PubMed ID: 28222873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis.
Zarone F; Ruggiero G; Ferrari M; Mangano F; Joda T; Sorrentino R
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):761.e1-761.e7. PubMed ID: 33289647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the accuracy of direct and indirect three-dimensional digitizing processes for CAD/CAM systems - An in vitro study.
Vecsei B; Joós-Kovács G; Borbély J; Hermann P
J Prosthodont Res; 2017 Apr; 61(2):177-184. PubMed ID: 27461088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of three digital scanning methods for complete-arch tooth preparation: An in vitro comparison.
Gao H; Liu X; Liu M; Yang X; Tan J
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1001-1008. PubMed ID: 33736864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner.
Flügge TV; Schlager S; Nelson K; Nahles S; Metzger MC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Sep; 144(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 23992820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study.
Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Tsagarakis A; Kourakis G; Pavlakis E
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):581-588. PubMed ID: 31870614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD/CAM restorations.
Quaas S; Rudolph H; Luthardt RG
J Dent; 2007 Dec; 35(12):903-8. PubMed ID: 17980951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trueness and precision of digital impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner with different head size in the partially edentulous mandible.
Hayama H; Fueki K; Wadachi J; Wakabayashi N
J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jul; 62(3):347-352. PubMed ID: 29502933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer-aided analysis of digital dental impressions obtained from intraoral and extraoral scanners.
Bohner LOL; De Luca Canto G; Marció BS; Laganá DC; Sesma N; Tortamano Neto P
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Nov; 118(5):617-623. PubMed ID: 28385434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of intraoral and extraoral digital data acquisition for dental restorations.
Rudolph H; Salmen H; Moldan M; Kuhn K; Sichwardt V; Wöstmann B; Luthardt RG
J Appl Oral Sci; 2016; 24(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 27008261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of Three Digitization Methods for the Dental Arch with Various Tooth Preparation Designs: An In Vitro Study.
Oh KC; Lee B; Park YB; Moon HS
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 30427097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro evaluation of the accuracy and precision of intraoral and extraoral complete-arch scans.
Baghani MT; Shayegh SS; Johnston WM; Shidfar S; Hakimaneh SMR
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Nov; 126(5):665-670. PubMed ID: 33070974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative evaluation of intraoral and extraoral digital impressions: An
Sason GK; Mistry G; Tabassum R; Shetty O
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(2):108-116. PubMed ID: 29692563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of full-arch digital impressions: an in vitro and in vivo comparison.
Keul C; Güth JF
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Feb; 24(2):735-745. PubMed ID: 31134345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the acquisition accuracy and digitizing noise of 9 intraoral and extraoral scanners: An objective method.
Dupagne L; Tapie L; Lebon N; Mawussi B
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1032-1040. PubMed ID: 33781577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the Accuracy of Digital Impressions Obtained from Intraoral and Extraoral Dental Scanners with Different CAD/CAM Scanning Technologies: An In Vitro Study.
Ellakany P; Tantawi ME; Mahrous AA; Al-Harbi F
J Prosthodont; 2022 Apr; 31(4):314-319. PubMed ID: 34085355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
