BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31831528)

  • 1. Can a simple 'cost-awareness' campaign for laparoscopic hysterectomy change the use and costs of disposable surgical supplies? Pre-post non-controlled study.
    Ross S; Lier D; Mackinnon G; Bentz C; Rakowski G; Capstick VA
    BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e027099. PubMed ID: 31831528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does Cost Influence the Choice of Disposable Versus Reusable Instruments? Mailed Survey of Obstetrician/Gynaecologists.
    Yang H; Capstick VA; Bentz C; Ross S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Oct; 41(10):1416-1422. PubMed ID: 30885506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy in a community hospital.
    Redwine DB
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1995 May; 2(3):305-10. PubMed ID: 9050574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single-Use Energy Sources and Operating Room Time for Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Holloran-Schwartz MB; Gavard JA; Martin JC; Blaskiewicz RJ; Yeung PP
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 26318400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reusable instruments are more cost-effective than disposable instruments for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Apelgren KN; Blank ML; Slomski CA; Hadjis NS
    Surg Endosc; 1994 Jan; 8(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 8153862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reusable single-port access device shortens operative time and reduces operative costs.
    Shussman N; Kedar A; Elazary R; Abu Gazala M; Rivkind AI; Mintz Y
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Jun; 28(6):1902-7. PubMed ID: 24442684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A prospective comparison of the costs of reusable and limited-reuse laparoscopic instruments.
    DesCôteaux JG; Blackmore K; Parsons L
    Can J Surg; 1998 Apr; 41(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 9575997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the costs of disposable and reusable supplies wasted during surgeries.
    Chasseigne V; Leguelinel-Blache G; Nguyen TL; de Tayrac R; Prudhomme M; Kinowski JM; Costa P
    Int J Surg; 2018 May; 53():18-23. PubMed ID: 29432971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating the true costs of disposable and reusable instruments.
    Mancuso R; Bickham MJ
    AORN J; 1995 Jul; 62(1):39-42, 45, 47-8. PubMed ID: 7574563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Educating surgeons on intraoperative disposable supply costs during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a regional health system's experience.
    Gitelis M; Vigneswaran Y; Ujiki MB; Denham W; Talamonti M; Muldoon JP; Linn JG
    Am J Surg; 2015 Mar; 209(3):488-92. PubMed ID: 25586597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children.
    Ure BM; Lefering R; Holschneider AM
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 1999 Feb; 9(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 10207696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs. abdominal hysterectomy in a community hospital. A cost comparison.
    Simon NV; Laveran RL; Cavanaugh S; Gerlach DH; Jackson JR
    J Reprod Med; 1999 Apr; 44(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 10319303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia.
    Herling SF; Palle C; Møller AM; Thomsen T; Sørensen J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Mar; 95(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 26575851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic review of reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instruments: costs and safety.
    Siu J; Hill AG; MacCormick AD
    ANZ J Surg; 2017 Jan; 87(1-2):28-33. PubMed ID: 27878921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reuse of disposable laparoscopic instruments: cost analysis.
    DesCôteaux JG; Tye L; Poulin EC
    Can J Surg; 1996 Apr; 39(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 8769924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Do costs decide? Disposable or reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy?].
    Lefering R; Troidl H; Ure BM
    Chirurg; 1994 Apr; 65(4):317-25. PubMed ID: 8020351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Operating room waste: disposable supply utilization in neurosurgical procedures.
    Zygourakis CC; Yoon S; Valencia V; Boscardin C; Moriates C; Gonzales R; Lawton MT
    J Neurosurg; 2017 Feb; 126(2):620-625. PubMed ID: 27153160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Disposable versus reusable instruments in laparoscopic surgery--a controlled study].
    Paolucci V; Schaeff B; Gutt C; Morawe G; Encke A
    Zentralbl Chir; 1995; 120(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 7887039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Picking apart surgical pick lists - Reducing variation to decrease surgical costs.
    Simon KL; Frelich MJ; Gould JC
    Am J Surg; 2018 Jan; 215(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 28676153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost of open and laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: surgeon perceptions versus the reality of hospital spending.
    Abraham L; Goyert N; Kagedan DJ; MacNeill A; Cleghorn MC; Hallet J; Quereshy FA; Coburn NG
    Can J Surg; 2018 Dec; 61(6):392-397. PubMed ID: 30265642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.