BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3183206)

  • 1. Synthetic vowel studies on cochlear implant patients.
    Tong YC; Lim HH; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Sep; 84(3):876-87. PubMed ID: 3183206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Place coding of vowel formants for cochlear implant patients.
    Blamey PJ; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):667-73. PubMed ID: 2212290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The recognition of vowels differing by a single formant by cochlear-implant subjects.
    Tyler RS; Tye-Murray N; Otto SR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Dec; 86(6):2107-12. PubMed ID: 2532227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identification of speech by cochlear implant recipients with the Multipeak (MPEAK) and Spectral Peak (SPEAK) speech coding strategies. I. Vowels.
    Skinner MW; Fourakis MS; Holden TA; Holden LK; Demorest ME
    Ear Hear; 1996 Jun; 17(3):182-97. PubMed ID: 8807261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vowel recognition via cochlear implants and noise vocoders: effects of formant movement and duration.
    Iverson P; Smith CA; Evans BG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Dec; 120(6):3998-4006. PubMed ID: 17225426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in vowel quality in post-lingually deafened cochlear implant users.
    Langereis MC; Bosman AJ; van Olphen AF; Smoorenburg GF
    Audiology; 1997; 36(5):279-97. PubMed ID: 9305524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Saliency of Vowel Features in Neural Responses of Cochlear Implant Users.
    Prévost F; Lehmann A
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 49(6):388-397. PubMed ID: 29690785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptual "vowel spaces" of cochlear implant users: implications for the study of auditory adaptation to spectral shift.
    Harnsberger JD; Svirsky MA; Kaiser AR; Pisoni DB; Wright R; Meyer TA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2135-45. PubMed ID: 11386565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vowel perception: experiments with a single-electrode cochlear implant.
    Doyle KJ; Danhauer JL; Edgerton BJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):179-92. PubMed ID: 3755193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimum spectral contrast needed for vowel identification by normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Loizou PC; Poroy O
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1619-27. PubMed ID: 11572371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mandarin compound vowels produced by prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.
    Yang J; Xu L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jun; 97():143-149. PubMed ID: 28483225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptual separation of simultaneous vowels: within and across-formant grouping by F0.
    Culling JF; Darwin CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jun; 93(6):3454-67. PubMed ID: 8326071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Phoneme recognition by deaf individuals using the multichannel nucleus cochlear implant.
    Mülder HE; Van Olphen AF; Bosman A; Smoorenburg GF
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992 Nov; 112(6):946-55. PubMed ID: 1481665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vowel and consonant recognition of cochlear implant patients using formant-estimating speech processors.
    Blamey PJ; Dowell RC; Brown AM; Clark GM; Seligman PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jul; 82(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 3624640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identification of synthetic vowels by patients using the Symbion multichannel cochlear implant.
    Dorman MF; Dankowski K; McCandless G; Smith L
    Ear Hear; 1989 Feb; 10(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 2721827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification and multiplicity of double vowels in cochlear implant users.
    Kwon BJ; Perry TT
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 57(5):1983-96. PubMed ID: 24879064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contribution of formant frequency information to vowel perception in steady-state noise by cochlear implant users.
    Sagi E; Svirsky MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):1027. PubMed ID: 28253672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Synthetic two-formant vowel perception by some of the better cochlear-implant patients.
    Tyler RS; Tye-Murray N; Moore BC; McCabe BF
    Audiology; 1989; 28(6):301-15. PubMed ID: 2532003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of formant bandwidth on the identification of synthetic vowels by cochlear implant recipients.
    Hawks JW; Fourakis MS; Skinner MW; Holden TA; Holden LK
    Ear Hear; 1997 Dec; 18(6):479-87. PubMed ID: 9416450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.