These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3183206)

  • 21. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Vowel perception strategies of normal-hearing subjects and patients using Nucleus multichannel and 3M/House cochlear implants.
    Tartter VC; Hellman SA; Chute PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1269-83. PubMed ID: 1401515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Improved neural representation of vowels in electric stimulation using desynchronizing pulse trains.
    Litvak L; Delgutte B; Eddington D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2099-111. PubMed ID: 14587608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of different types of auditory stimulation on vowel formant frequencies in multichannel cochlear implant users.
    Svirsky MA; Tobey EA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jun; 89(6):2895-904. PubMed ID: 1918629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Linear phoneme boundaries for German synthetic two-formant vowels.
    Hose B; Langner G; Scheich H
    Hear Res; 1983 Jan; 9(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 6219082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Vowel formant discrimination for high-fidelity speech.
    Liu C; Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1224-33. PubMed ID: 15376687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Place-pitch and vowel-pitch comparisons in cochlear implant patients using the Melbourne-Nucleus cochlear implant.
    Pauka CK
    J Laryngol Otol Suppl; 1989; 19():1-31. PubMed ID: 2693565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Acoustic parameters measured by a formant-estimating speech processor for a multiple-channel cochlear implant.
    Blamey PJ; Dowell RC; Clark GM; Seligman PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jul; 82(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 3624639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of relative amplitude and formant transitions on perception of place of articulation by adult listeners with cochlear implants.
    Hedrick MS; Carney AE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Dec; 40(6):1445-57. PubMed ID: 9430763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Phoneme recognition and confusions with multichannel cochlear implants: vowels.
    Välimaa TT; Määttä TK; Löppönen HJ; Sorri MJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Oct; 45(5):1039-54. PubMed ID: 12381059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [An analytical study on recognition confusion of vowels in patients with 22 channel cochlear implant].
    Momoi T
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1995 Aug; 98(8):1318-22. PubMed ID: 7472771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The multi-channel cochlear implant and the relief of severe-to-profound deafness.
    Clark G
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2012 May; 13(2):69-85. PubMed ID: 22334029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Acoustic Analysis of Persian Vowels in Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison With Hearing-impaired Children Using Hearing Aid and Normal-hearing Children.
    Jafari N; Yadegari F; Jalaie S
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):763.e1-763.e7. PubMed ID: 26725549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Frequency discrimination of stylized synthetic vowels with two formants.
    Lyzenga J; Horst JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Nov; 104(5):2956-66. PubMed ID: 9821340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Speech coding in the auditory nerve: V. Vowels in background noise.
    Delgutte B; Kiang NY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Mar; 75(3):908-18. PubMed ID: 6707320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Additive noise can enhance temporal coding in a computational model of analogue cochlear implant stimulation.
    Morse RP; Evans EF
    Hear Res; 1999 Jul; 133(1-2):107-19. PubMed ID: 10416869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems: perception of formant targets, formant movement, and duration.
    Iverson P; Evans BG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2842-54. PubMed ID: 18189574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The perception of back vowels: centre of gravity hypothesis.
    Assmann PF
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Aug; 43(3):423-48. PubMed ID: 1775650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The identification of consonants and vowels by cochlear implant patients using a 6-channel continuous interleaved sampling processor and by normal-hearing subjects using simulations of processors with two to nine channels.
    Dorman MF; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 9562538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Speech discrimination in deaf subjects with cochlear implants.
    Eddington DK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Sep; 68(3):885-91. PubMed ID: 6893461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.