These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3183206)

  • 41. The neural encoding of formant frequencies contributing to vowel identification in normal-hearing listeners.
    Won JH; Tremblay K; Clinard CG; Wright RA; Sagi E; Svirsky M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jan; 139(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 26826999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Speech intelligibility, speaking rate, and vowel formant characteristics in Mandarin-speaking children with cochlear implant.
    Chuang HF; Yang CC; Chi LY; Weismer G; Wang YT
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2012 Apr; 14(2):119-29. PubMed ID: 22292985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Auditory Nerve Fiber Discrimination and Representation of Naturally-Spoken Vowels in Noise.
    Heeringa AN; Köppl C
    eNeuro; 2022; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 35086866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Discharge pattern in the auditory nerve evoked by vowel stimuli: a comparison between acoustical and electrical stimulation.
    Knauth M; Hartmann R; Klinke R
    Hear Res; 1994 Apr; 74(1-2):247-58. PubMed ID: 8040095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effects of auditory feedback deprivation length on the vowel /epsilon/ produced by pediatric cochlear-implant users.
    Bharadwaj SV; Graves AG; Bauer DD; Assmann PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 May; 121(5 Pt1):EL196-202. PubMed ID: 17550203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Coherence masking protection in speech sounds: the role of formant synchrony.
    Gordon PC
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Feb; 59(2):232-42. PubMed ID: 9055618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Acoustic and perceptual appraisal of speech production in pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Poissant SF; Peters KA; Robb MP
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jul; 70(7):1195-203. PubMed ID: 16460814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Auditory nerve representation of vowels in background noise.
    Sachs MB; Voigt HF; Young ED
    J Neurophysiol; 1983 Jul; 50(1):27-45. PubMed ID: 6875649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The relative importance of spectral tilt in monophthongs and diphthongs.
    Kiefte M; Kluender KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1395-404. PubMed ID: 15807027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Perceptual adaptation to spectrally shifted vowels: training with nonlexical labels.
    Li T; Fu QJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Mar; 8(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17131213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Formant pattern ambiguity of vowel sounds.
    Maurer D; D'Heureuse C; Landis T
    Int J Neurosci; 2000; 100(1-4):39-76. PubMed ID: 10512548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Neural representation of vowel formants in tonotopic auditory cortex.
    Fisher JM; Dick FK; Levy DF; Wilson SM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Sep; 178():574-582. PubMed ID: 29860083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The role of formant transitions in the perception of concurrent vowels.
    Assmann PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jan; 97(1):575-84. PubMed ID: 7860834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The representation of the spectra and fundamental frequencies of steady-state single- and double-vowel sounds in the temporal discharge patterns of guinea pig cochlear-nerve fibers.
    Palmer AR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1412-26. PubMed ID: 2229676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Noise helps cochlear implant listeners to categorize vowels.
    Morse RP; Holmes SD; Irving R; McAlpine D
    JASA Express Lett; 2022 Apr; 2(4):042001. PubMed ID: 36154230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A mathematical model of vowel identification by users of cochlear implants.
    Sagi E; Meyer TA; Kaiser AR; Teoh SW; Svirsky MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):1069-83. PubMed ID: 20136228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The contribution of apical stimulation to Mandarin speech perception in users of the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant.
    Qi B; Liu B; Krenmayr A; Liu S; Gong S; Liu H; Zhang N; Han D
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jan; 131(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 20863152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Vowel Formants in Normal and Loud Speech.
    Koenig LL; Fuchs S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 May; 62(5):1278-1295. PubMed ID: 31084509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Frequency measurement of vowel formants produced by Brazilian children aged between 4 and 8 years.
    Viegas F; Viegas D; Baeck HE
    J Voice; 2015 May; 29(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 25510161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Vowel confusion patterns in adults during initial 4 years of implant use.
    Välimaa TT; Sorri MJ; Laitakari J; Sivonen V; Muhli A
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2011 Feb; 25(2):121-44. PubMed ID: 21070135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.