189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31832739)
1. Inter- and intra-reader reproducibility of shear wave elastography measurements for musculoskeletal soft tissue masses.
Nicholls J; Alfuraih AM; Hensor EMA; Robinson P
Skeletal Radiol; 2020 May; 49(5):779-786. PubMed ID: 31832739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Do quantitative and qualitative shear wave elastography have a role in evaluating musculoskeletal soft tissue masses?
Pass B; Jafari M; Rowbotham E; Hensor EM; Gupta H; Robinson P
Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):723-731. PubMed ID: 27277260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sonoelastography of Musculoskeletal Soft Tissue Masses: A Pilot Study of Quantitative Evaluation.
Pass B; Johnson M; Hensor EM; Gupta H; Robinson P
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Oct; 35(10):2209-16. PubMed ID: 27663655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intra- and inter-operator reproducibility of US point shear-wave elastography in various organs: evaluation in phantoms and healthy volunteers.
Kishimoto R; Kikuchi K; Koyama A; Kershaw J; Omatsu T; Tachibana Y; Suga M; Obata T
Eur Radiol; 2019 Nov; 29(11):5999-6008. PubMed ID: 31089847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance elastography of the supraspinatus muscle: A preliminary study on test-retest repeatability and wave quality with different frequencies and image filtering.
Ito D; Numano T; Ueki T; Habe T; Maeno T; Takamoto K; Igarashi K; Maharjan S; Mizuhara K; Nishijo H
Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Sep; 71():27-36. PubMed ID: 32325234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterization of soft tissue tumours with ultrasound, shear wave elastography and MRI.
Winn N; Baldwin J; Cassar-Pullicino V; Cool P; Ockendon M; Tins B; Jaremko JL
Skeletal Radiol; 2020 Jun; 49(6):869-881. PubMed ID: 31897519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of ultrasound point shear wave elastography reliability in an elasticity phantom.
Sultan SR; Alghamdi A; Abdeen R; Almutairi F
Ultrasonography; 2022 Apr; 41(2):291-297. PubMed ID: 35316890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intra- and Inter-Observer Reproducibility of a 2-D Shear Wave Elastography Technique and the Impact of Ultrasound Experience in Achieving Reliable Data.
Moga TV; Stepan AM; Pienar C; Bende F; Popescu A; Șirli R; Dănilă M; Sporea I
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1627-1637. PubMed ID: 29801976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Shear-Wave Elastography of Benign versus Malignant Musculoskeletal Soft-Tissue Masses: Comparison with Conventional US and MRI.
Tavare AN; Alfuraih AM; Hensor EMA; Astrinakis E; Gupta H; Robinson P
Radiology; 2019 Feb; 290(2):410-417. PubMed ID: 30480491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Superficial ultrasound shear wave speed measurements in soft and hard elasticity phantoms: repeatability and reproducibility using two ultrasound systems.
Dillman JR; Chen S; Davenport MS; Zhao H; Urban MW; Song P; Watcharotone K; Carson PL
Pediatr Radiol; 2015 Mar; 45(3):376-85. PubMed ID: 25249389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of agreement between manual and automated processing of liver MR elastography for shear stiffness estimation in children and young adults with autoimmune liver disease.
Gandhi DB; Pednekar A; Braimah AB; Dudley J; Tkach JA; Trout AT; Miethke AG; Franck MD; Heilman JA; Dzyubak B; Lake DS; Dillman JR
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Aug; 46(8):3927-3934. PubMed ID: 33811261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Standard Breath-Held, Free-Breathing, and Compressed Sensing 2D Gradient-Recalled Echo MR Elastography Techniques for Evaluating Liver Stiffness.
Morin CE; Dillman JR; Serai SD; Trout AT; Tkach JA; Wang H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Dec; 211(6):W279-W287. PubMed ID: 30300003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Variability, Validity and Operator Reliability of Three Ultrasound Systems for Measuring Tissue Stiffness: A Phantom Study.
Javed H; Oyibo SO; Alfuraih AM
Cureus; 2022 Nov; 14(11):e31731. PubMed ID: 36420046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Repeatability of shear wave elastography in liver fibrosis phantoms-Evaluation of five different systems.
Mulabecirovic A; Mjelle AB; Gilja OH; Vesterhus M; Havre RF
PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0189671. PubMed ID: 29293527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproducibility of 2-Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography Assessment of the Liver: A Direct Comparison With Point Shear Wave Elastography in Healthy Volunteers.
Fang C; Konstantatou E; Romanos O; Yusuf GT; Quinlan DJ; Sidhu PS
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Aug; 36(8):1563-1569. PubMed ID: 28370146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability of shear wave ultrasound elastography for neck lesions identified in routine clinical practice.
Bhatia K; Tong CS; Cho CC; Yuen EH; Lee J; Ahuja AT
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Oct; 33(5):463-8. PubMed ID: 23070932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inter- and intra-operator reliability and repeatability of shear wave elastography in the liver: a study in healthy volunteers.
Hudson JM; Milot L; Parry C; Williams R; Burns PN
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Jun; 39(6):950-5. PubMed ID: 23453379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In Vitro Comparison of Five Different Elastography Systems for Clinical Applications, Using Strain and Shear Wave Technology.
Mulabecirovic A; Vesterhus M; Gilja OH; Havre RF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 42(11):2572-2588. PubMed ID: 27570209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can Shoulder Muscle Activity Be Evaluated With Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography?
Kim K; Hwang HJ; Kim SG; Lee JH; Jeong WK
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 476(6):1276-1283. PubMed ID: 29698293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
