BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3183283)

  • 21. Prevalence of refractive error in Bangladeshi adults: results of the National Blindness and Low Vision Survey of Bangladesh.
    Bourne RR; Dineen BP; Ali SM; Noorul Huq DM; Johnson GJ
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Jun; 111(6):1150-60. PubMed ID: 15177965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Development of stereoscopic acuity: longitudinal study using a computer-based random-dot stereo test.
    Takai Y; Sato M; Tan R; Hirai T
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2005; 49(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15692766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Visual acuity screening of infants and young children with the acuity card procedure.
    Dobson V; McDonald MA; Kohl P; Stern N; Samek M; Preston K
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1986 Apr; 57(4):284-9. PubMed ID: 3700951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of infant accommodation using retinoscopy and photoretinoscopy.
    Gabriel GM; Mutti DO
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):208-15. PubMed ID: 19165126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Refractive error in children in a rural population in India.
    Dandona R; Dandona L; Srinivas M; Sahare P; Narsaiah S; Muñoz SR; Pokharel GP; Ellwein LB
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Mar; 43(3):615-22. PubMed ID: 11867575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [The preferential looking technic: material and procedure for testing baby vision].
    Vital-Durand F; Cottard M
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1985; 8(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 4056319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of test proximity and induced refractive error on stereoacuity.
    Larson W
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1987 Oct; 64(10):796. PubMed ID: 3688183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Stereoacuity in unilateral visual impairment detected at preschool screening: outcomes from a randomized controlled trial.
    Richardson SR; Wright CM; Hrisos S; Buck D; Clarke MP
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 46(1):150-4. PubMed ID: 15623768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The 'mirror test' for estimating visual acuity in infants.
    Bowman R; McCulloch DL; Law E; Mostyn K; Dutton GN
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jul; 94(7):882-5. PubMed ID: 19948561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effectiveness of the random dot E stereotest as a preschool vision screening instrument.
    Rosner J
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1978 Oct; 49(10):1121-4. PubMed ID: 730980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Visual acuity tolerance to residual refractive errors in patients with an apodized diffractive intraocular lens.
    Fernández-Vega L; Alfonso JF; Montés-Micó R; Amhaz H
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 18242440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative evaluation of Teller and Cardiff acuity tests in normals and unilateral amblyopes in under-two-year-olds.
    Sharma P; Bairagi D; Sachdeva MM; Kaur K; Khokhar S; Saxena R
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 51(4):341-5. PubMed ID: 14750623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Normal emmetropization in infants with spectacle correction for hyperopia.
    Atkinson J; Anker S; Bobier W; Braddick O; Durden K; Nardini M; Watson P
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Nov; 41(12):3726-31. PubMed ID: 11053269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Evaluation of grating visual acuity development in normal infants].
    Qiu Y; Li XQ; Yan XM
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Nov; 47(11):995-1000. PubMed ID: 22336065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The random dot test as a screening method for the visual acuity in children (author's transl)].
    van Laer P; Blum K; Niesel P
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1978 Apr; 172(4):635-8. PubMed ID: 651245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Refractive errors in an urban population in Southern India: the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study.
    Dandona R; Dandona L; Naduvilath TJ; Srinivas M; McCarty CA; Rao GN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Nov; 40(12):2810-8. PubMed ID: 10549640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [The relationship between the developmental change in visual acuity measurements and change of refractive error in young infants].
    Sato M; Awaya S; Suzuki Y; Yagasaki T; Ito Y
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Jul; 97(7):861-7. PubMed ID: 8352085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The association between refractive cutoffs for spectacle provision and visual improvement among school-aged children in South Africa.
    Congdon NG; Patel N; Esteso P; Chikwembani F; Webber F; Msithini RB; Ratcliffe A
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Jan; 92(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 17591673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accommodation and refractive error in children with Down syndrome: cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.
    Cregg M; Woodhouse JM; Pakeman VH; Saunders KJ; Gunter HL; Parker M; Fraser WI; Sastry P
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Jan; 42(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 11133848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Binocular visual form deprivation in human infants.
    Mohindra I; Jacobson SG; Held R
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1983 May; 55(3):237-49. PubMed ID: 6884175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.