233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31832841)
41. Screening of species-specific lactic acid bacteria for veal calves multi-strain probiotic adjuncts.
Ripamonti B; Agazzi A; Bersani C; De Dea P; Pecorini C; Pirani S; Rebucci R; Savoini G; Stella S; Stenico A; Tirloni E; Domeneghini C
Anaerobe; 2011 Jun; 17(3):97-105. PubMed ID: 21619939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Adhesion of Lactobacillus plantarum 423 and Lactobacillus salivarius 241 to the intestinal tract of piglets, as recorded with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), and production of plantaricin 423 by cells colonized to the ileum.
Maré L; Wolfaardt GM; Dicks LM
J Appl Microbiol; 2006 Apr; 100(4):838-45. PubMed ID: 16553740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Screening for lactic acid bacteria capable of inhibiting Campylobacter jejuni in in vitro simulations of the broiler chicken caecal environment.
Robyn J; Rasschaert G; Messens W; Pasmans F; Heyndrickx M
Benef Microbes; 2012 Dec; 3(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 23234730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Impact of two probiotic Lactobacillus strains feeding on fecal lactobacilli and weight gains in chicken.
Lan PT; Binh le T; Benno Y
J Gen Appl Microbiol; 2003 Feb; 49(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 12682864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from stool samples of longevous people in regions of Hotan, Xinjiang and Bama, Guangxi, China.
Gu RX; Yang ZQ; Li ZH; Chen SL; Luo ZL
Anaerobe; 2008 Dec; 14(6):313-7. PubMed ID: 18634896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Antimicrobial activity of Lactobacillus strains of chicken origin against bacterial pathogenss.
Dec M; Puchalski A; Nowaczek A; Wernicki A
Int Microbiol; 2016 Mar; 19(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 27762430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Tailoring the probiotic potential of non-starter Lactobacillus strains from ripened Parmigiano Reggiano cheese by in vitro screening and principal component analysis.
Solieri L; Bianchi A; Mottolese G; Lemmetti F; Giudici P
Food Microbiol; 2014 Apr; 38():240-9. PubMed ID: 24290648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Genome sequence of Lactobacillus salivarius SMXD51, a potential probiotic strain isolated from chicken cecum, showing anti-campylobacter activity.
Kergourlay G; Messaoudi S; Dousset X; Prévost H
J Bacteriol; 2012 Jun; 194(11):3008-9. PubMed ID: 22582370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Determining the probiotic potential of cholesterol-reducing Lactobacillus and Weissella strains isolated from gherkins (fermented cucumber) and south Indian fermented koozh.
Anandharaj M; Sivasankari B; Santhanakaruppu R; Manimaran M; Rani RP; Sivakumar S
Res Microbiol; 2015 Jun; 166(5):428-439. PubMed ID: 25839996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. In Vitro Evaluation of Probiotic Properties of Lactic Acid Bacteria from the Gut of Labeo rohita and Catla catla.
Sahoo TK; Jena PK; Nagar N; Patel AK; Seshadri S
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins; 2015 Jun; 7(2):126-36. PubMed ID: 25634754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Probiotic screening and safety evaluation of Lactobacillus strains from plants, artisanal goat cheese, human stools, and breast milk.
Gotteland M; Cires MJ; Carvallo C; Vega N; Ramirez MA; Morales P; Rivas P; Astudillo F; Navarrete P; Dubos C; Figueroa A; Troncoso M; Ulloa C; Mizgier ML; Carrasco-Pozo C; Speisky H; Brunser O; Figueroa G
J Med Food; 2014 Apr; 17(4):487-95. PubMed ID: 24433075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Molecular and biochemical characterizations of human oral lactobacilli as putative probiotic candidates.
Strahinic I; Busarcevic M; Pavlica D; Milasin J; Golic N; Topisirovic L
Oral Microbiol Immunol; 2007 Apr; 22(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 17311634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Identification of probiotic lactobacilli used for animal feeds on the basis of 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence.
Higuchi W; Muramatsu M; Dohmae S; Takano T; Isobe H; Yabe S; Da S; Baranovich T; Yamamoto T
Microbiol Immunol; 2008 Nov; 52(11):559-63. PubMed ID: 19090836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Characterisation of prototype Nurmi cultures using culture-based microbiological techniques and PCR-DGGE.
Waters SM; Murphy RA; Power RF
Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Aug; 110(3):268-77. PubMed ID: 16814892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Probiotic Potential of Lactobacillus Strains with Antifungal Activity Isolated from Animal Manure.
Ilavenil S; Park HS; Vijayakumar M; Arasu MV; Kim DH; Ravikumar S; Choi KC
ScientificWorldJournal; 2015; 2015():802570. PubMed ID: 26167534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Quantification of FITC-labelled probiotic Lactobacillus salivarius DSPV 001P during gastrointestinal transit in broilers.
Blajman JE; Astesana DM; Zimmermann JA; Rossler E; Scharpen AR; Berisvil AP; Zbrun MV; Soto LP; Rosmini MR; Frizzo LS
Benef Microbes; 2017 Feb; 8(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 27903091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens as a probiotic strain on growth performance, cecal microflora, and fecal noxious gas emissions of broiler chickens.
Ahmed ST; Islam M; Mun HS; Sim HJ; Kim YJ; Yang CJ
Poult Sci; 2014 Aug; 93(8):1963-71. PubMed ID: 24902704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Modulation of broilers' caecal microflora and metabolites in response to a potential probiotic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens.
Cao GT; Zhan XA; Zhang LL; Zeng XF; Chen AG; Yang CM
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl); 2018 Apr; 102(2):e909-e917. PubMed ID: 29314285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Taxonomy and important features of probiotic microorganisms in food and nutrition.
Holzapfel WH; Haberer P; Geisen R; Björkroth J; Schillinger U
Am J Clin Nutr; 2001 Feb; 73(2 Suppl):365S-373S. PubMed ID: 11157343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [The effect of Lactobacillus salivarius administration on coliform bacteria and enterococci in the crop and cecum of broiler chickens].
Rada V; Rychlý I
Vet Med (Praha); 1995 Oct; 40(10):311-5. PubMed ID: 8659080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
