151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31832867)
1. Towards Including End-Users in the Design of Prosthetic Hands: Ethical Analysis of a Survey of Australians with Upper-Limb Difference.
Walker MJ; Goddard E; Stephens-Fripp B; Alici G
Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Apr; 26(2):981-1007. PubMed ID: 31832867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A survey on what Australians with upper limb difference want in a prosthesis: justification for using soft robotics and additive manufacturing for customized prosthetic hands.
Stephens-Fripp B; Jean Walker M; Goddard E; Alici G
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Apr; 15(3):342-349. PubMed ID: 30856031
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A User-Driven Approach to Prosthetic Upper Limb Development in Korea.
Ju N; Lee KH; Kim MO; Choi Y
Healthcare (Basel); 2021 Jul; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 34356217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. User surveys support designing a prosthetic wrist that incorporates the Dart Thrower's Motion.
Davidson M; Bodine C; Weir RFF
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2019 Apr; 14(3):312-315. PubMed ID: 29514521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A narrative review: current upper limb prosthetic options and design.
Trent L; Intintoli M; Prigge P; Bollinger C; Walters LS; Conyers D; Miguelez J; Ryan T
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Aug; 15(6):604-613. PubMed ID: 30973275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. An investigation into the relationship between paracycling athletes and their prosthetics technology: a proposed design framework.
Dyer B
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Feb; 15(2):166-172. PubMed ID: 30689473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. What do users and their aiding professionals want from future devices in upper limb prosthetics? A focus group study.
Einfeldt AK; Rebmann F; Yao D; Stukenborg-Colsmann C; Hurschler C; Windhagen H; Jakubowitz E
PLoS One; 2023; 18(12):e0295516. PubMed ID: 38157364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identifying the benefits and risks of emerging integration methods for upper limb prosthetic devices in the United States: an environmental scan.
Kelley MA; Benz H; Engdahl S; Bridges JFP
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2019 Jul; 16(7):631-641. PubMed ID: 31145868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Advances in Prosthetics and Rehabilitation of Individuals with Limb Loss.
Keszler MS; Heckman JT; Kaufman GE; Morgenroth DC
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2019 May; 30(2):423-437. PubMed ID: 30954156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Test-retest reliability of the Swedish version of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey.
Jarl G; Holmefur M; Hermansson LM
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Feb; 38(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 23652919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3D printed upper limb prosthetics.
Vujaklija I; Farina D
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2018 Jul; 15(7):505-512. PubMed ID: 29949397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prosthetics, Medicine, and Disability in Modern America: The Case of the A. A. Marks Artificial Limb Company.
Lee HJ
Uisahak; 2023 Apr; 32(1):33-80. PubMed ID: 37257924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Advanced upper limb prosthetic devices: implications for upper limb prosthetic rehabilitation.
Resnik L; Meucci MR; Lieberman-Klinger S; Fantini C; Kelty DL; Disla R; Sasson N
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Apr; 93(4):710-7. PubMed ID: 22464092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feminine identity and functional benefits are key factors in women's decision making about upper limb prostheses: a case series.
Resnik L; Klinger S; Gill A; Ekerholm Biester S
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2019 Feb; 14(2):194-208. PubMed ID: 29741966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Towards User-Centred Prosthetics Research Beyond the Laboratory.
Jones H; Webb L; Dyson M; Nazarpour K
Front Neurosci; 2022; 16():863833. PubMed ID: 35495033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Controlling a multi-degree of freedom upper limb prosthesis using foot controls: user experience.
Resnik L; Klinger SL; Etter K; Fantini C
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2014 Jul; 9(4):318-29. PubMed ID: 23902465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prosthetics, orthotics, and assistive devices. 3. Prosthetics.
Esquenazi A; Leonard JA; Meier RH; Hicks JE; Fisher SV; Nelson VS
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1989 May; 70(5-S):S206-9. PubMed ID: 2655560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Applications of sensory feedback in motorized upper extremity prosthesis: a review.
Schofield JS; Evans KR; Carey JP; Hebert JS
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2014 Sep; 11(5):499-511. PubMed ID: 24928327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enhancing quality of prosthetic services with process and outcome information.
Heinemann AW; Ehrlich-Jones L; Connelly L; Semik P; Fatone S
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Apr; 41(2):164-170. PubMed ID: 27091865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prosthetic limb use in Australia 1981-1985 under the Free Limb Scheme.
Jones LE
Prosthet Orthot Int; 1989 Aug; 13(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 2780264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
