273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31834517)
1. The quality of guidelines on the end-of-life care: a systematic quality appraisal using AGREE II instrument.
Irajpour A; Hashemi M; Taleghani F
Support Care Cancer; 2020 Apr; 28(4):1555-1561. PubMed ID: 31834517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Guidelines for the use of survivorship care plans: a systematic quality appraisal using the AGREE II instrument.
Birken SA; Ellis SD; Walker JS; DiMartino LD; Check DK; Gerstel AA; Mayer DK
Implement Sci; 2015 May; 10():63. PubMed ID: 25935752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines on treatments for oral cancer.
Madera Anaya MV; Franco JV; Merchán-Galvis ÁM; Gallardo CR; Bonfill Cosp X
Cancer Treat Rev; 2018 Apr; 65():47-53. PubMed ID: 29547765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality of therapeutic drug monitoring guidelines is suboptimal: an evaluation using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument.
Zeng M; Yi Q; Zeng L; Chen Z; Mi X; Song H; Zhang X; Li Y; Wang Q; Zhao R; Miao L; Zhang L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Apr; 120():47-58. PubMed ID: 31678686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines with physical activity recommendations for people diagnosed with cancer: A systematic critical appraisal using the AGREE II tool.
Shallwani SM; King J; Thomas R; Thevenot O; De Angelis G; Aburub AS; Brosseau L
PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0214846. PubMed ID: 30969981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality appraisal of gestational diabetes mellitus guidelines with AGREE II: a systematic review.
Zhang M; Zhou Y; Zhong J; Wang K; Ding Y; Li L; Pan X
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Dec; 19(1):478. PubMed ID: 31805878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Guidelines for uveal melanoma: a critical appraisal of systematically identified guidelines using the AGREE II and AGREE-REX instrument.
Steeb T; Hayani KM; Förster P; Liegl R; Toussaint F; Schlaak M; Berking C; Heppt MV
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2020 Apr; 146(4):1079-1088. PubMed ID: 32036455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A systematic review of the quality of clinical practice guidelines for lymphedema, as assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument.
O'Donnell TF; Allison GM; Melikian R; Iafrati MD
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2020 Jul; 8(4):685-692. PubMed ID: 32335331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of Palliative Care Guidelines in Patients with Heart Failure: A Systematic Review of Quality Appraisal using AGREE II Instrument.
Bagheri I; Yousefi H; Bahrami M; Shafie D
Indian J Palliat Care; 2023; 29(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 36846280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Appraisal of guidelines for androgenetic alopecia using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument.
Huang M; Zhou X
J Eval Clin Pract; 2015 Dec; 21(6):1089-94. PubMed ID: 26507460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Appraisal of the “pediatric ARDS: consensus recommendations from the pediatric acute lung injury consensus conference” with the AGREE II instrument.
Tolunay O; Tolunay İ; Yıldızdaş RD; Çelik T; Çelik Ü
Turk J Med Sci; 2018 Feb; 48(1):84-88. PubMed ID: 29479961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hypertension: Evaluation of Quality Using the AGREE II Instrument.
Zhang X; Zhao K; Bai Z; Yu J; Bai F
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs; 2016 Dec; 16(6):439-451. PubMed ID: 27580999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An appraisal of emergency medicine clinical practice guidelines: Do we agree?
Zupon A; Rothenberg C; Couturier K; Tan TX; Siddiqui G; James M; Savage D; Melnick ER; Venkatesh AK
Int J Clin Pract; 2019 Feb; 73(2):e13289. PubMed ID: 30372798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality of clinical practice guidelines in dermatological oncology.
de Haas ER; de Vijlder HC; van Reesema WS; van Everdingen JJ; Neumann HA
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2007 Oct; 21(9):1193-8. PubMed ID: 17894704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A critical appraisal of the North American Spine Society guidelines with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument.
Yaman ME; Gudeloglu A; Senturk S; Yaman ND; Tolunay T; Ozturk Y; Arslan AK
Spine J; 2015 Apr; 15(4):777-81. PubMed ID: 25614152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the current guidelines for resection of hepatocellular carcinoma using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument.
Gavriilidis P; Roberts KJ; Askari A; Sutcliffe RP; Huo TL; Liu PH; Hidalgo E; Compagnon P; Lim C; Azoulay D
J Hepatol; 2017 Nov; 67(5):991-998. PubMed ID: 28690176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical practice guidelines for the nutritional risk screening and assessment of cancer patients: a systematic quality appraisal using the AGREE II instrument.
Zhou HJ; Deng LJ; Wang T; Chen JX; Jiang SZ; Yang L; Liu F; Weng MH; Hu JW; Tan JY
Support Care Cancer; 2021 Jun; 29(6):2885-2893. PubMed ID: 33638747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Methodological quality of guidelines for management of Lyme neuroborreliosis.
Dersch R; Toews I; Sommer H; Rauer S; Meerpohl JJ
BMC Neurol; 2015 Nov; 15():242. PubMed ID: 26607686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical practice guidelines on newborn hearing screening: A systematic quality appraisal using the AGREE II instrument.
Chorath K; Garza L; Tarriela A; Luu N; Rajasekaran K; Moreira A
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Feb; 141():110504. PubMed ID: 33229031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements in oncology--an assessment of their methodological quality.
Jacobs C; Graham ID; Makarski J; Chassé M; Fergusson D; Hutton B; Clemons M
PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e110469. PubMed ID: 25329669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
