187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31834649)
1. Attitudes and perceptions of people with a learning disability, family carers, and paid care workers towards cancer screening programmes in the United Kingdom: A qualitative systematic review and meta-aggregation.
Byrnes K; Hamilton S; McGeechan GJ; O'Malley C; Mankelow J; Giles EL
Psychooncology; 2020 Mar; 29(3):475-484. PubMed ID: 31834649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
Eddy K; Jordan Z; Stephenson M
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):96-137. PubMed ID: 27532314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Factor influencing women with learning disabilities deciding to, and accessing, cervical and breast cancer screening: Findings from a Q methodology study of women with learning disabilities, family and paid carers.
Sykes K; McGeechan GJ; Crawford H; Giles EL
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2022 Nov; 31(6):e13702. PubMed ID: 36094022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.
Rees S; Williams A
JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2009; 7(13):492-582. PubMed ID: 27819974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Paid- and family-carers' views on supporting women with intellectual disability through breast screening.
Willis DS; Kilbride L; Horsburgh D; Kennedy CM
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2015 Jul; 24(4):473-82. PubMed ID: 25286771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors affecting patient adherence to publicly funded colorectal cancer screening programmes: a systematic review.
Dressler J; Johnsen AT; Madsen LJ; Rasmussen M; Jorgensen LN
Public Health; 2021 Jan; 190():67-74. PubMed ID: 33360029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
Busolo D; Woodgate R
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 26447011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Barriers to flexible sigmoidoscopy colorectal cancer screening in low uptake socio-demographic groups: A systematic review.
Travis E; Ashley L; Pownall M; O'Connor DB
Psychooncology; 2020 Aug; 29(8):1237-1247. PubMed ID: 32539187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. "I Want to Help, but What Do You Do in a Situation Like That?" Health Care Providers' Qualitative Perspectives on Working with Disabled Women in Breast Cancer Screening.
Seaton MB; Muraca L; Devaney J; Angus JE
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2018 Dec; 49(4):383-389. PubMed ID: 30514555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Systematic Review and Meta-study Synthesis of Qualitative Studies Evaluating Facilitators and Barriers to Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening.
Honein-AbouHaidar GN; Kastner M; Vuong V; Perrier L; Daly C; Rabeneck L; Straus S; Baxter NN
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2016 Jun; 25(6):907-17. PubMed ID: 27197277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast cancer knowledge among women with intellectual disabilities and their experiences of receiving breast mammography.
Truesdale-Kennedy M; Taggart L; McIlfatrick S
J Adv Nurs; 2011 Jun; 67(6):1294-304. PubMed ID: 21366669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors influencing the decision to attend screening for cancer in the UK: a meta-ethnography of qualitative research.
Young B; Bedford L; Kendrick D; Vedhara K; Robertson JFR; das Nair R
J Public Health (Oxf); 2018 Jun; 40(2):315-339. PubMed ID: 28486650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The experiences of caring for someone with dementia and a learning disability: A qualitative systematic review.
Hughes M; Hanna K; Wiles A; Taylor E; Giebel C
Dementia (London); 2024 Jul; 23(5):817-849. PubMed ID: 38172089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Barriers and facilitators for people with severe mental illness accessing cancer screening: A systematic review.
Tuschick E; Barker J; Giles EL; Jones S; Hogg J; Kanmodi KK; Sill J; Sykes K
Psychooncology; 2024 Jan; 33(1):e6274. PubMed ID: 38282230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast and cervical cancer screening for women with physical disabilities: A qualitative study of experiences and barriers.
Kilic A; Tastan S; Guvenc G; Akyuz A
J Adv Nurs; 2019 Sep; 75(9):1976-1986. PubMed ID: 31087581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Developing methods for systematic reviewing in health services delivery and organization: an example from a review of access to health care for people with learning disabilities. Part 1. Identifying the literature.
McNally R; Alborz A
Health Info Libr J; 2004 Sep; 21(3):182-92. PubMed ID: 15318916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Barriers to cancer screening for people with disabilities: a literature review.
Merten JW; Pomeranz JL; King JL; Moorhouse M; Wynn RD
Disabil Health J; 2015 Jan; 8(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 25096629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Family caregivers' perspectives on barriers and facilitators of cervical and breast cancer screening for women with intellectual disability.
Swaine JG; Dababnah S; Parish SL; Luken K
Intellect Dev Disabil; 2013 Feb; 51(1):62-73. PubMed ID: 23360409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An integrative review exploring black men of African and Caribbean backgrounds, their fears of prostate cancer and their attitudes towards screening.
Alexis O; Worsley A
Health Educ Res; 2018 Apr; 33(2):155-166. PubMed ID: 29444301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of screening on future health-promoting behaviours and health beliefs: a systematic review.
Bankhead CR; Brett J; Bukach C; Webster P; Stewart-Brown S; Munafo M; Austoker J
Health Technol Assess; 2003; 7(42):1-92. PubMed ID: 14670217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
