These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31834995)

  • 21. Optimal investment in electric generating capacity under climate policy.
    Cornelis van Kooten G; Mokhtarzadeh F
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 232():66-72. PubMed ID: 30468959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of the most likely low-emission electricity production systems in Estonia.
    Baird ZS; Neshumayev D; Järvik O; Powell KM
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261780. PubMed ID: 34968401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of technology assumptions on US power sector capacity, generation and emissions projections: Results from the EMF 32 Model Intercomparison Project.
    Creason JR; Bistline JE; Hodson EL; Murray BC; Rossmann CG
    Energy Econ; 2018; 73():290-306. PubMed ID: 31073253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Costs for integrating wind into the future ERCOT system with related costs for savings in CO2 emissions.
    Lu X; McElroy MB; Sluzas NA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Apr; 45(7):3160-6. PubMed ID: 21375280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Coordinated EV adoption: double-digit reductions in emissions and fuel use for $40/vehicle-year.
    Choi DG; Kreikebaum F; Thomas VM; Divan D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Sep; 47(18):10703-7. PubMed ID: 23875888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Analysis of Costs and Time Frame for Reducing CO
    Supekar SD; Skerlos SJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Oct; 51(19):10932-10942. PubMed ID: 28910087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Optimizing the Chinese Electricity Mix for CO
    Kang J; Ng TS; Su B; Yuan R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Jan; 54(2):697-706. PubMed ID: 31855603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Do renewable portfolio standards increase renewable energy capacity? Evidence from the United States.
    Joshi J
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Jun; 287():112261. PubMed ID: 33721760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sustainable Low-Carbon Expansion for the Power Sector of an Emerging Economy: The Case of Kenya.
    Carvallo JP; Shaw BJ; Avila NI; Kammen DM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Sep; 51(17):10232-10242. PubMed ID: 28783318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluating an economic application of renewable generated hydrogen: A way forward for green economic performance and policy measures.
    Wu B; Zhai B; Mu H; Peng X; Wang C; Patwary AK
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Feb; 29(10):15144-15158. PubMed ID: 34628612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessment of potential carbon dioxide reductions due to biomass-coal cofiring in the United States.
    Robinson AL; Rhodes JS; Keith DW
    Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Nov; 37(22):5081-9. PubMed ID: 14655692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Informed public choices for low-carbon electricity portfolios using a computer decision tool.
    Mayer LA; Bruine de Bruin W; Morgan MG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Apr; 48(7):3640-8. PubMed ID: 24564708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of CO
    Abdallah L; El-Shennawy T
    EuroMediterr J Environ Integr; 2020; 5(3):49. PubMed ID: 32984503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Regional air quality management aspects of climate change: impact of climate mitigation options on regional air emissions.
    Rudokas J; Miller PJ; Trail MA; Russell AG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Apr; 49(8):5170-7. PubMed ID: 25803240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hydro, wind and solar power as a base for a 100% renewable energy supply for South and Central America.
    Barbosa LS; Bogdanov D; Vainikka P; Breyer C
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173820. PubMed ID: 28329023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of cost efficiencies of nuclear power and renewable energy generation in mitigating CO
    Kim HS
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Jan; 28(1):789-795. PubMed ID: 32820449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Analysis of Direct Air Capture Integrated with Wind Energy and Enhanced Oil Recovery.
    Datta A; Krishnamoorti R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Feb; 57(5):2084-2092. PubMed ID: 36692891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Broad ranges of investment configurations for renewable power systems, robust to cost uncertainty and near-optimality.
    Neumann F; Brown T
    iScience; 2023 May; 26(5):106702. PubMed ID: 37216107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cost of wind energy: comparing distant wind resources to local resources in the midwestern United States.
    Hoppock DC; Patiño-Echeverri D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Nov; 44(22):8758-65. PubMed ID: 20931984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Estimating the Quantity of Wind and Solar Required To Displace Storage-Induced Emissions.
    Hittinger E; Azevedo IML
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 51(21):12988-12997. PubMed ID: 29016129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.